Korean J Sports Med.  2023 Mar;41(1):11-18. 10.5763/kjsm.2023.41.1.11.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Adjustable Tensioning under Arthroscopic Visualization Provides Satisfactory Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Recurrent patellar dislocation required a surgical reconstruction of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) in many cases. During MPFL reconstruction, over-tension of medial construct altered the patellofemoral kinematics which may result in pain, patellofemoral joint degeneration, or graft failure. Thus, it is important to confirm appropriate tension intraoperatively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of MPFL reconstruction with use of an adjustable tensioning under arthroscopic direct visualization of patellofemoral joint.
Methods
This retrospective study included 11 MPFL reconstructions (nine patients) from 2013 to 2020. All the patients received the same surgical procedures by a single surgeon. Final graft tension was determined after confirming patellar position to the trochlear groove at 60° knee flexion under arthroscopic exam. Patient demographics, pre- and postoperative radiographic results including congruence angle and Insall-Salvati ratio, and clinical outcomes were compared.
Results
The congruence angle was significantly changed from 32.8°±21.1° preoperatively to 8.4°±11.5° postoperatively (p=0.003), and the Insall-Salvati ratio was 1.16°±0.15° and 1.10°±0.13° respectively (p=0.02). Clinical scores were significantly improved between pre- and postoperatively; Kujala score (33.2±18.3 to 88.8±4.7, p=0.04), Lysholm score (30.2±15 to 79.0±5.2, p=0.005), and Tegner level (2.2±1.1 to 4.4±1.7, p=0.04). There was no recurrence of patellar dislocation.
Conclusion
MPFL reconstruction using adjustable tensioning under arthroscopic direct visualization could obtain satisfactory outcomes after surgery.

Keyword

Medial patellofemoral ligament; Reconstruction; Arthroscopy; Video-assisted surgery; Treatment outcome

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Intraoperative fluoroscopic image of distal femur that determined the isometric femoral attachment site of medial patellofemoral ligament. Dotted line: vertical line from posterior femoral cortex, dashed line: the most posterior aspect of the Blumensaat line.

  • Fig. 2 Arthroscopic images during the 2nd step of tension adjustment. (A) Knee flexion of 30° at which angle lots of conventional studies recommended for final fixation of graft, showing insufficient patellar engagement. (B) Knee flexion of 60° showing sufficient patellar engagement.

  • Fig. 3 An illustration depicting surgical procedures and tension adjustment method.

  • Fig. 4 The Merchant view of (A) pre- and (B) postoperative radiographs. Angle c indicates congruence angle and angle t indicates patellar tilt.


Reference

1. Dejour H, Walch G, Neyret P, Adeleine P. 1990; Dysplasia of the femoral trochlea. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 76:45–54.
2. Dejour H, Walch G, Nove-Josserand L, Guier C. 1994; Factors of patellar instability: an anatomic radiographic study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2:19–26. DOI: 10.1007/BF01552649. PMID: 7584171.
3. Shatrov J, Vialla T, Sappey-Marinier E, et al. 2023; At 10-year minimum follow-up, one-third of patients have patellofemoral arthritis after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using gracilis tendon autograft. Arthroscopy. 39:349–57. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.07.021. PMID: 35988794.
4. Repo JP, Uimonen MM, Nevalainen MT, et al. 2022; Outcomes following the operative treatment of intra-articular fracture combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction after patellar dislocation. Knee Surg Relat Res. 34:21. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-022-00150-6. PMID: 35418118. PMCID: PMC9008916.
5. Dong Z, Xu C, Yan L, Liu J, Wang F. Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is valid to stabilize patellofemoral joint but uncertain to reduce patellar height in setting of lateral patellar dislocation and patella alta. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; Apr. 1. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04429-x. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04429-x. PMID: 35362817.
6. Thaunat M, Erasmus PJ. 2009; Management of overtight medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 17:480–3. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0702-z. PMID: 19132347.
7. Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ. 2006; Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage: a computational analysis. Am J Sports Med. 34:1478–85. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506287486. PMID: 16685097.
8. Stephen JM, Kittl C, Williams A, et al. 2016; Effect of Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction method on patellofemoral contact pressures and kinematics. Am J Sports Med. 44:1186–94. DOI: 10.1177/0363546516631736. PMID: 26944575.
9. Feller JA, Richmond AK, Wasiak J. 2014; Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction as an isolated or combined procedure for recurrent patellar instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 22:2470–6. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3132-0. PMID: 24928369.
10. McCarthy M, Ridley TJ, Bollier M, Wolf B, Albright J, Amendola A. 2013; Femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Iowa Orthop J. 33:58–63.
11. Dejour D, Le Coultre B. 2007; Osteotomies in patello-femoral instabilities. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 15:39–46. DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0b013e31803035ae. PMID: 17301701.
12. Wibeeg G. 1941; Roentgenographs and anatomic studies on the femoropatellar joint: with special reference to chondromalacia patellae. Acta Orthop Scand. 12:319–410. DOI: 10.3109/17453674108988818.
13. Song EK, Seon JK, Kim MC, Seol YJ, Lee SH. 2016; Radiologic measurement of tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance by lower extremity rotational profile computed tomography in Koreans. Clin Orthop Surg. 8:45–8. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2016.8.1.45. PMID: 26929798. PMCID: PMC4761600.
14. Insall J, Salvati E. 1971; Patella position in the normal knee joint. Radiology. 101:101–4. DOI: 10.1148/101.1.101. PMID: 5111961.
15. Schöttle PB, Schmeling A, Rosenstiel N, Weiler A. 2007; Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 35:801–4. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506296415.
16. Aliberti GM, Kraeutler MJ, Miskimin C, Scillia AJ, Belk JW, Mulcahey MK. 2021; Autograft versus allograft for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med. 9:23259671211046639. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211046639. PMID: 34692883. PMCID: PMC8529317.
17. Hendawi T, Godshaw B, Flowers C, Stephens I, Haber L, Waldron S. 2019; Autograft vs Allograft comparison in pediatric medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Ochsner J. 19:96–101. DOI: 10.31486/toj.18.0081. PMID: 31258420. PMCID: PMC6584189.
18. Desio SM, Burks RT, Bachus KN. 1998; Soft tissue restraints to lateral patellar translation in the human knee. Am J Sports Med. 26:59–65. DOI: 10.1177/03635465980260012701. PMID: 9474403.
19. Nomura E, Horiuchi Y, Kihara M. 2000; Medial patellofemoral ligament restraint in lateral patellar translation and reconstruction. Knee. 7:121–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(00)00038-7. PMID: 10788776.
20. Smirk C, Morris H. 2003; The anatomy and reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee. 10:221–7. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00038-3. PMID: 12893143.
21. Zaffagnini S, Colle F, Lopomo N, et al. 2013; The influence of medial patellofemoral ligament on patellofemoral joint kinematics and patellar stability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 21:2164–71. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2307-9. PMID: 23179455.
22. Nomura E, Inoue M, Osada N. 2005; Anatomical analysis of the medial patellofemoral ligament of the knee, especially the femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 13:510–5. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0607-4. PMID: 15895206.
23. Amis AA, Firer P, Mountney J, Senavongse W, Thomas NP. 2003; Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee. 10:215–20. DOI: 10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00006-1. PMID: 12893142.
24. Luczak SB, Stelzer JW, Fitzsimmons KP, Pace JL. 2021; Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and lateral retinacular lengthening from a lateral approach. Arthrosc Tech. 10:e987–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2020.11.018. PMID: 33981541. PMCID: PMC8085033.
25. Zimmermann F, Milinkovic DD, Börtlein J, Balcarek P. 2022; Revision surgery for failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in better disease-specific outcome scores when performed for recurrent instability than for patellofemoral pain or limited range of motion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 30:1718–24. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06734-1. PMID: 34491379.
26. Migliorini F, Oliva F, Maffulli GD, et al. 2021; Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: analysis of outcomes and risk factors. J Orthop Surg Res. 16:239. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02383-9. PMID: 33823887. PMCID: PMC8022360.
27. Shimizu R, Sumen Y, Sakaridani K, Matsuura M, Adachi N. 2019; Middle-to long-term outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with Insall's proximal realignment for patellar instability. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 17:5–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2019.02.002. PMID: 30984562. PMCID: PMC6444065.
28. Kim TS, Kim HJ, Ra IH, Kyung HS. 2015; Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability using a gracilis autograft without bone tunnel. Clin Orthop Surg. 7:457–64. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2015.7.4.457. PMID: 26640628. PMCID: PMC4667113.
29. Basso M, Arnaldi E, Tamini J, Bruno AA. 2021; Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with autologous gracilis tendon: clinical and radiological outcomes at a mean 6 years of follow up. Knee. 33:252–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.009. PMID: 34739956.
30. Vivekanantha P, Kahlon H, Cohen D, de Sa D. Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in similar postoperative outcomes as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial-tubercle osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; Oct. 10. [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-022-07186-x. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07186-x. PMID: 36214831.
Full Text Links
  • KJSM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr