Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2023 Feb;27(1):87-94. 10.14701/ahbps.22-042.

Is central pancreatectomy an effective alternative to distal pancreatectomy for low-grade pancreatic neck and body tumors: A 20-year single-center propensity score-matched case-control study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Nizam’s Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
Central pancreatectomy (CP) is associated with a higher rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), and it is less preferred over distal pancreatectomy (DP). We compared the short- and long-term outcomes between CP and DP for low-grade pancreatic neck and body tumors.
Methods
This was a propensity score-matched case-control study of patients who underwent either CP or DP for low-grade pancreatic neck and body tumors from 2003 to 2020 in a tertiary care unit in southern India. Patients with a tumor >10 cm or a distal residual stump length of <4 cm were excluded. Demographics, clinical profile, intraoperative and postoperative parameters, and the long-term postoperative outcomes for exocrine and endocrine insufficiency, weight gain, and the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire were compared.
Results
Eighty-eight patients (CP: n=37 [cases], DP: n=51 [control]) were included in the unmatched group after excluding 21 patients (meeting exclusion criteria). After matching, both groups had 37 patients. The clinical and demographic profiles were comparable between the two groups. Blood loss and POPF rates were significantly higher in the CP group. However, Clavien-Dindo grades of complications were similar between the two groups (p = 0.27). At a median follow-up of 38 months (range = 187 months), exocrine sufficiency was similar between the two groups. Endocrine sufficiency, weight gain, SF-36 pain control score, and general health score were significantly better in the CP group.
Conclusions
Despite equivalent clinically significant morbidities, long-term outcomes are better after CP compared to DP in lowgrade pancreatic body tumors.

Keyword

Pancreatectomy; Morbidity; Quality of life

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of patient selection. ASA, American Society of Anaesthesiologists.


Reference

1. Lee DH, Jang JY. 2020; ASO author reflections: central pancreatectomy versus distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign or low-grade malignant neoplasms: a propensity score-matched study with long-term functional outcomes and pancreas volumetry. Ann Surg Oncol. 27:1225–1226. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08133-w. PMID: 31965371.
Article
2. Iacono C, Verlato G, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, Bacchelli C, Valdegamberi A, et al. 2013; Systematic review of central pancreatectomy and meta-analysis of central versus distal pancreatectomy. Br J Surg. 100:873–885. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9136. PMID: 23640664.
Article
3. Mahseeri M, Alqaiseieh A, Alkhader D, Halbony H, Albreazat M, Abualhaj S. 2021; Central pancreatectomy for solid pseudopapillary neoplasm: a pancreatic-preserving procedure. Int J Surg Case Rep. 79:91–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.01.009. PMID: 33444966. PMCID: PMC7806954.
Article
4. Lv A, Qian HG, Qiu H, Wu JH, Hao CY. 2018; Is central pancreatectomy truly recommendable? A 9-year single-center experience. Dig Surg. 35:532–538. DOI: 10.1159/000485806. PMID: 29275422.
Article
5. Girish S, Kapil N, Kannan N. 2021; Central pancreatectomy: significance of vascularity on anastomotic integrity and a note on reconstructive technique. Cureus. 13:e18617. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18617.
Article
6. Lee DH, Han Y, Byun Y, Kim H, Kwon W, Jang JY. 2020; Central pancreatectomy versus distal pancreatectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and low-grade malignant neoplasms: a retrospective and propensity score-matched study with long-term functional outcomes and pancreas volumetry. Ann Surg Oncol. 27:1215–1224. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08095-z. PMID: 31898101.
Article
7. Nag HH, Nekarakanti PK, Arvinda PS, Sharma A. 2022; Laparoscopic versus open surgical management of patients with chronic pancreatitis: a matched case-control study. J Minim Access Surg. 18:191–196. DOI: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_183_20. PMID: 33885009. PMCID: PMC8973484.
Article
8. Johnson MA, Rajendran S, Balachandar TG, Kannan DG, Jeswanth S, Ravichandran P, et al. 2006; Central pancreatectomy for benign pancreatic pathology/trauma: is it a reasonable pancreas-preserving conservative surgical strategy alternative to standard major pancreatic resection? ANZ J Surg. 76:987–995. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03916.x. PMID: 17054548.
Article
9. Brown KM, Shoup M, Abodeely A, Hodul P, Brems JJ, Aranha GV. 2006; Central pancreatectomy for benign pancreatic lesions. HPB (Oxford). 8:142–147. DOI: 10.1080/13651820510037611. PMID: 18333263. PMCID: PMC2131409.
Article
10. Gao H, Liu T, Wang G, Gao Y, Yin L, Peng Y, et al. 2019; Central pancreatectomy for early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a single-center case-control study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 404:175–182. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01766-1. PMID: 30826926.
Article
11. Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Paci M, Ftériche FS, Cros J, Maire F, et al. 2019; Extended laparoscopic central pancreatectomy with clamping of the mesentericoportal vein and resection of the splenic vessels for a large solid pseudopapillary tumor. Ann Surg Oncol. 26:3709–3710. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07689-x. PMID: 31407182.
Article
12. Senthilnathan P, Gul SI, Gurumurthy SS, Palanivelu PR, Parthasarathi R, Palanisamy NV, et al. 2015; Laparoscopic central pancreatectomy: our technique and long-term results in 14 patients. J Minim Access Surg. 11:167–171. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.158967. PMID: 26195873. PMCID: PMC4499920.
Article
13. Kang P, Wang Z, Leng K, Zhong X, Wang H, Wan M, et al. 2017; Binding pancreaticogastrostomy anastomosis in central pancreatectomy: a single center experience. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e8354. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008354. PMID: 29137016. PMCID: PMC5690709.
14. Wayne M, Neragi-Miandoab S, Kasmin F, Brown W, Pahuja A, Cooperman AM. 2009; Central pancreatectomy without anastomosis. World J Surg Oncol. 7:67. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-7-67. PMID: 19719851. PMCID: PMC2743692.
Article
15. Lyu Y, Li T, Cheng Y, Wang B, Chen L, Zhao S. 2018; Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an up-to-date meta-analysis of RCTs applying the ISGPS (2016) criteria. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 28:139–146. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000530. PMID: 29683997. PMCID: PMC5999363.
Article
16. Sauvanet A, Partensky C, Sastre B, Gigot JF, Fagniez PL, Tuech JJ, et al. 2002; Medial pancreatectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study of 53 patients by the French Pancreas Club. Surgery. 132:836–843. DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.127552. PMID: 12464868.
Article
17. Wang ZZ, Zhao GD, Zhao ZM, Hu MG, Tan XL, Zhang X, et al. 2021; A comparative study of end-to-end pancreatic anastomosis versus pancreaticojejunostomy after robotic central pancreatectomy. Updates Surg. 73:967–975. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01037-z. PMID: 33797734.
Article
18. Regmi P, Yang Q, Hu HJ, Liu F, Karn HR, Ma WJ, et al. 2020; Overall postoperative morbidity and pancreatic fistula are relatively higher after central pancreatectomy than distal pancreatic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020:7038907. DOI: 10.1155/2020/7038907. PMID: 32219139. PMCID: PMC7057026.
Article
19. Dragomir MP, Sabo AA, Petrescu GED, Li Y, Dumitrascu T. 2019; Central pancreatectomy: a comprehensive, up-to-date meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 404:945–958. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01829-3. PMID: 31641855.
Article
20. Zhang RC, Zhang B, Mou YP, Xu XW, Zhou YC, Huang CJ, et al. 2017; Comparison of clinical outcomes and quality of life between laparoscopic and open central pancreatectomy with pancreaticojejunostomy. Surg Endosc. 31:4756–4763. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5552-7. PMID: 28424909.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr