Nutr Res Pract.  2023 Feb;17(1):149-163. 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.1.149.

Application of draft nutritional standards for school lunches in the Republic of Korea: a feasibility study from the supplier perspective

• Nam Y
• Yoon J
• Kim M

• KMID: 2539448
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2023.17.1.149

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of application of the draft nutritional standards for school lunches in the Republic of Korea (South Korea) from the supplier perspective.
SUBJECTS/METHODS
In November 2018, a pilot operation was conducted at 104 participating schools for 2 weeks each by applying the draft standards A and B. To evaluate the ease and appropriateness of application of the standards, we analyzed the nutritional values and food cost of the school lunches for 2 weeks before and for 4 weeks under the pilot operation. We conducted an online survey of school dietitians or nutrition teachers of the participating schools to evaluate the feasibility of application of the standards in school lunch sites.
RESULTS
The proportions of schools of which lunches met the reference values of the school’s own nutritional standards were 19.2% for the standards A and 21.2% for the standards B. The food cost of school lunches applying the standards A (KRW 2,880) was significantly lower than that of school lunches applying the standards B (KRW 3,030) or the existing standards (KRW 2,980). As a result of the survey, the mean score for the ease of application was significantly higher for the standards B (2.75) than for the standards A (2.24). The proportions of school dietitians or nutrition teachers reporting no problem in meeting an existing food cost standard were 72.5% for the standards A and 61.8% for the standards B, respectively. The overall appropriateness of application was higher for the standards B, because almost two-thirds (58.8%) of the respondents answered that the standards B were more appropriate than the standards A.
CONCLUSION
The standards B were more feasible to apply as nutritional standards for school lunches than the standards A from the supplier perspective.

Keyword

Schools; food services; reference standards; dietitians; surveys and questionnaires

Reference

1. Adamson A, Spence S, Reed L, Conway R, Palmer A, Stewart E, McBratney J, Carter L, Beattie S, Nelson M. School food standards in the UK: implementation and evaluation. Public Health Nutr. 2013; 16:968–981. PMID: 23578662.

2. Haroun D, Harper C, Wood L, Nelson M. The impact of the food-based and nutrient-based standards on lunchtime food and drink provision and consumption in primary schools in England. Public Health Nutr. 2011; 14:209–218. PMID: 20701821.

3. Spence S, Delve J, Stamp E, Matthews JN, White M, Adamson AJ. The impact of food and nutrient-based standards on primary school children’s lunch and total dietary intake: a natural experimental evaluation of government policy in England. PLoS One. 2013; 8:e78298. PMID: 24205190.

4. Kim M, Kim SY, Yoon J. Study on necessity of updating nutritional standards for school lunch programs in Korea. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life. 2017; 27:137–147.

5. Kim M, Abe S, Zhang C, Kim S, Choi J, Hernandez E, Nozue M, Yoon J. Comparison of the nutrient-based standards for school lunches among South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017; 26:160–168. PMID: 28049276.

6. Institute of Medicine (US). School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine;2008.

7. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (JP). Establishing of the standards of school lunch intakes in 2020 (report) [Internet]. Tokyo: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology;2020. cited 2021 July 10. Available from: https://www.mext.go.jp/content/20201228-mxt_kenshoku-100003354_01.pdf .

8. Ministry of Education (TW)Ministry of Education (TW). School lunch food content and nutritional standards [Internet]. Taipei: Ministry of Education;2020. cited 2021 May 10. Available from: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=545&pid=731 .

9. Yu HW. Explanations of the Standards for Food and Nutrition Facts of School Lunch Programs. Taipei: John Tung Foundation;2014.

10. Ministry of Education (KR). Human Resources Development (KR). The Manual in School Meals Act. Seoul: Ministry of Education;2007.

11. Yoon J. Development of the Nutritional Standards for School Lunches. Jincheon: Korean Educational Development Institute;2018.

12. Mucavele P, Nicholas J, Sharp L. Development and Pilot Testing of Revised Food-based Standards for School Lunches in England: Final Report Compiled for the School Food Plan’s Standards Panel. Sheffield: Children’s Food Trust;2013.

13. Im KS. Guidelines of Food Quality Standards and Nutrition Management for School Meals. Seoul: Ministry of Education;2004.

14. Yoon J. Feasibility Study on Application of Revised Nutritional Standards for School Lunches. Cheongju: Korea Educational Environments Prevention Agency;2019.

15. Kim M, Nam Y. Feasibility study on application of revised nutritional standards for school lunches: consumer satisfaction survey. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2019; 29:367–382.

16. Institute of Medicine (US). Dietary Reference Intakes: Application in Dietary Planning. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine;2003.

17. Ministry of Education (CA). Ministry of Healthy Living and Sport (CA). The School Meal and School Nutrition Program Handbook. Toronto: Ministry of Education;2009.

18. Ahn YJ, Lee YE. Current and future operation of menu management in the school foodservices of Chungbuk (1) -menu planning-. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr. 2012; 41:1118–1133.

19. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR). The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2015. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2015.

20. Park MJ. Recent advances in regulating energy homeostasis and obesity. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2005; 48:126–137.

21. Mello MM, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Obesity--the new frontier of public health law. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354:2601–2610. PMID: 16775242.

22. Hu T, Mills KT, Yao L, Demanelis K, Eloustaz M, Yancy WS Jr, Kelly TN, He J, Bazzano LA. Effects of low-carbohydrate diets versus low-fat diets on metabolic risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Am J Epidemiol. 2012; 176(Suppl 7):S44–S54. PMID: 23035144.

23. Numao S, Kawano H, Endo N, Yamada Y, Konishi M, Takahashi M, Sakamoto S. Short-term low carbohydrate/high-fat diet intake increases postprandial plasma glucose and glucagon-like peptide-1 levels during an oral glucose tolerance test in healthy men. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012; 66:926–931. PMID: 22669333.

24. Park MH, Choi YS, Kim YJ. Comparisons of food preference and nutrient intake of students of elementary school and middle school providing school food service in Nam Jeju Gun. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2002; 8:342–358.

25. Ministry of Health and Welfare (KR). Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Korea Health Statistics 2018: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES VII-3). Cheongju: Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency;2018.

26. Yim KS, Lee TY, Kim CI, Choi KS, Lee JH, Kweoun SJ, Kim MO. Strategies to improve nutritional management in primary school lunch program. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2004; 10:235–245.

27. School Milk Information System (KR). School milk statistics [Internet]. Sejong: Korea Dairy Committee;2019. cited 2021 May 19. Available from: http://www.schoolmilk.or.kr/ .

28. Kim KM, Lee YH. A study on nutrition management of dietitian for school lunch program in Seoul and Incheon provinces. J Korean Diet Assoc. 2003; 9:57–70.