1. Yoon J, Chung E. An investigation on graphical abstracts use in scholarly articles. Int J Inf Manage. 2017; 37(1):1371–1379.
2. Yeung AW, Kletecka-Pulker M, Eibensteiner F, Plunger P, Völkl-Kernstock S, Willschke H, et al. Implications of Twitter in health-related research: a landscape analysis of the scientific literature. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:654481. PMID:
34307273.
3. Aggarwal V. Visual abstracts do not increase some impact scores more than conventional abstracts of clinical research: a retrospective cohort study. Health Info Libr J. 2021; 38(4):259–267.
4. Ibrahim AM, Lillemoe KD, Klingensmith ME, Dimick JB. Visual abstracts to disseminate research on social media: a prospective, case-control crossover study. Ann Surg. 2017; 266(6):e46–e48. PMID:
28448382.
5. Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Maksaev AA, Kitas GD. Article-level metrics. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(11):e74. PMID:
33754507.
6. Joshi M, Gupta L. Preparing infographics for post-publication promotion of research on social media. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(5):e41. PMID:
33527783.
7. Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Social media platforms: a primer for researchers. Reumatologia. 2021; 59(2):68–72. PMID:
33976459.
8. Logghe HJ, Boeck MA, Atallah SB. Decoding Twitter: understanding the history, instruments, and techniques for success. Ann Surg. 2016; 264(6):904–908. PMID:
27322186.
9. Baan CC, Dor FJ. The transplantation journal on social media: the @transplantjrnl journey from impact factor to Klout score. Transplantation. 2017; 101(1):8–10. PMID:
27906823.
10. Sinnenberg L, Buttenheim AM, Padrez K, Mancheno C, Ungar L, Merchant RM. Twitter as a tool for health research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2017; 107(1):e1–e8.
11. Pferschy-Wenzig EM, Pferschy U, Wang D, Mocan A, Atanasov AG. Does a graphical abstract bring more visibility to your paper? Molecules. 2016; 21(9):E1247.
12. Moura-Neto JA, Riella MC. Visual abstracts: an innovative way to disseminate scientific Information. J Bras Nefrol. 2020; 42(3):357–360. PMID:
32129788.
13. Ibrahim AM, Bradley SM. Adoption of visual abstracts at
Circulation CQO: why and how we’re doing it. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017; 10(3):e003684. PMID:
28302648.
14. Stahl-Timmins W, Black J, Simpson P.. Pragmatic evaluation of the BMJ’s visual abstracts. Inf Des J. 2019; 25(1):101–109.
15. Chapman SJ, Grossman RC, FitzPatrick ME, Brady RR. Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media. Br J Surg. 2019; 106(12):1611–1616.
16. Oska S, Lerma E, Topf J. A picture is worth a thousand views: a triple crossover trial of visual abstracts to examine their impact on research dissemination. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22(12):e22327. PMID:
33275112.
17. Masciantonio A, Bourguignon D, Bouchat P, Balty M, Rimé B. Don’t put all social network sites in one basket: Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, TikTok, and their relations with well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One. 2021; 16(3):e0248384. PMID:
33705462.
18. Ronco P, Rovin B; Entire Editorial Team. Associate Editors. Citius, altius, fortius. . . . faster, higher, stronger. Kidney Int. 2019; 95(3):476–478. PMID:
30784651.
19. Yaminfirooz M, Ardali FR. Identifying the factors affecting papers’ citability in the field of medicine: an evidence-based approach using 200 highly and lowly-cited papers. Acta Inform Med. 2018; 26(1):10–14. PMID:
29719306.
20. Roldan-Valadez E, Rios C. Alternative bibliometrics from impact factor improved the esteem of a journal in a 2-year-ahead annual-citation calculation: multivariate analysis of gastroenterology and hepatology journals. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015; 27(2):115–122. PMID:
25533428.