1. Committee opinion No 701: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129:e155–9.
2. Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 2015:CD003677.
Article
3. Kives S, Lefebvre G; Clinical Gynaecology Committee. Supracervical hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010; 32:62–8.
4. Pegu B, Srinivas BH, Saranya TS, Murugesan R, Priyadarshini Thippeswamy S, Gaur BPS. Cervical polyp: evaluating the need of routine surgical intervention and its correlation with cervical smear cytology and endometrial pathology: a retrospective study. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2020; 63:735–42.
Article
5. Yuksel S, Tuna G, Celik HG, Salman S. Endometrial polyps: is the prediction of spontaneous regression possible? Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021; 64:114–21.
Article
6. Sasaki KJ, Cholkeri-Singh A, Sulo S, Miller CE. Persistent bleeding after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. JSLS. 2014; 18:e2014-002064.
Article
7. Scott JR, Sharp HT, Dodson MK, Norton PA, Warner HR. Subtotal hysterectomy in modern gynecology: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176:1186–91.
Article
8. Neis F, Reisenauer C, Kraemer B, Wagner P, Brucker S. Retrospective analysis of secondary resection of the cervical stump after subtotal hysterectomy: why and when? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021; 304:1519–26.
Article
9. Hellström AC, Hellman K, Pettersson BF, Andersson S. Carcinoma of the cervical stump: fifty years of experience. Oncol Rep. 2011; 25:1651–4.
Article
10. Shen Z, Zhou Y, Cheng Y, Li M, Wu D. Retrospective analysis of surgery for cervical stump carcinoma at early stage. Mol Clin Oncol. 2018; 8:352–5.
Article
11. Asnafi N, Basirat Z, Hajian-Tilaki KO. Outcomes of total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy. East Mediterr Health J. 2010; 16:176–9.
Article
12. Elbohoty SB, Dawood AS, Elgergawy AE. Gynecological presentations following supravaginal hysterectomy for benign pathologies. W J Gynecol Women’s Health. 2020; 3:WJGWH.MS.ID.000558.
13. Tsafrir Z, Aoun J, Papalekas E, Taylor A, Schiff L, Theoharis E, et al. Risk factors for trachelectomy following supracervical hysterectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96:421–5.
Article
14. Andersen LL, Zobbe V, Ottesen B, Gluud C, Tabor A, Gimbel H, et al. Five-year follow up of a randomised controlled trial comparing subtotal with total abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG. 2015; 122:851–7.
Article
15. Okaro EO, Jones KD, Sutton C. Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG. 2001; 108:1017–20.
Article
16. Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Ballard K. Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG. 2008; 115:1605–10.
Article
17. Dawood AS, Harras H, Lotfy HA. Histopathological findings in symptomatizing patients after supracervical hysterectomy: a cross sectional study. W J Gynecol Women’s Health. 2021; 5:WJGWH.MS.ID.000601.
Article
18. Nezhat CH, Nezhat F, Roemisch M, Seidman DS, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic trachelectomy for persistent pelvic pain and endometriosis after supracervical hysterectomy. Fertil Steril. 1996; 66:925–8.
Article
19. Vieira MA, Rendón GJ, Munsell M, Echeverri L, Frumovitz M, Schmeler KM, et al. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2015; 138:585–9.
Article
20. Lu Z, Guo C, Wang T, Qiu J, Hua K. Characteristics, complications, and outcomes of early-stage cervical stump carcinoma: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. J Int Med Res. 2021; 49:300060521992247.
Article
21. Yunker A, Curlin H, Banet N, Fadare O, Steege J. Does the uterine cervix become abnormally reinnervated after subtotal hysterectomy and what is the association with future trachelectomy? J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22:261–7.
Article