Korean J Women Health Nurs.  2022 Sep;28(3):169-173. 10.4069/kjwhn.2022.09.19.

Gender issues in nursing research

• Yun CH

• KMID: 2535434
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2022.09.19

Figure

• 

  Figure 1. Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) flowchart guiding editors’ initial screening of submitted manuscripts. Adapted from Heidari et al. [10] according to the Creative Commons License.

Reference

References

1. Hu FB, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Ascherio A, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Prospective study of major dietary patterns and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000; 72(4):912–921. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.4.912.

2. Bjorklund P. Invisibility, moral knowledge and nursing work in the writings of Joan Liaschenko and Patricia Rodney. Nurs Ethics. 2004; 11(2):110–121. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733004ne677oa.

3. Kelly UA. Integrating intersectionality and biomedicine in health disparities research. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2009; 32(2):E42–E56. https://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181a3b3fc.

4. Vuolanto P, Laiho A. The gender perspective in nursing research: a theoretical treasure chest or a ‘thorn’ in the side? Minerva. 2017; 55:371–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9318-0.

5. Yi M, Yih BS. Feminism and qualitative nursing research. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004; 34(3):565–575. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2004.34.3.565.

6. Scott PE, Unger EF, Jenkins MR, Southworth MR, McDowell TY, Geller RJ, et al. Participation of women in clinical trials supporting FDA approval of cardiovascular drugs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71(18):1960–1969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.070.

7. Peters SA, Woodward M. Sex and gender matter in cardiovascular disease and beyond. Heart. 2022; 108(13):994–995. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-320719.

8. Saxena A, Lasher E, Somerville C, Heidari S. Considerations of sex and gender dimensions by research ethics committees: a scoping review. Int Health. 2022 Jan 18 [Epub]; https://doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihab093.

9. White J, Tannenbaum C, Klinge I, Schiebinger L, Clayton J. The integration of sex and gender considerations into biomedical research: lessons from international funding agencies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 106(10):3034–3048. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab434.

10. Heidari S, Babor TF, De Castro P, Tort S, Curno M. Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016; 1:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6.

11. Peters SA, Babor TF, Norton RN, Clayton JA, Ovseiko PV, Tannenbaum C, et al. Fifth anniversary of the Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines: taking stock and looking ahead. BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6(11):e007853. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007853.