J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci.  2022 Jun;38(2):81-89. 10.14368/jdras.2022.38.2.81.

Comparison vibration characteristics of several wireless endodontic handpieces

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Wireless endodontic handpieces (WEH) are widely used in dental clinics due to their convenience and portability. This study aimed to compare the vibration magnitudes and patterns generated by five WEH.
Materials and Methods
Vibration acceleration of five WEH (X-Smart IQ, E connect S, Endo A Class, ENDOIT, and TRAUS ENDO) in the rotary and reciprocating motion was measured with accelerometer The average vibration acceleration was analyzed using the t-test, Welch’s ANOVA test, and Dunnett T3 test at P < 0.05.
Results
In all WEH, the average vibration acceleration in reciprocating motion was significantly higher than that in rotary motion (P < 0.001). In rotary motion, repeated vibration graphs of constant amplitude were obtained without sudden changes in the magnitude of vibration, and the average vibration acceleration value was high in the order of X Smart IQ, Endo A Class, ENDOIT, E Connect S, and TRAUS ENDO (P < 0.001), there was no statistically significant difference between X Smart IQ and Endo A Class. In reciprocating motion, a vibration graph was obtained in which large amplitude peaks appear at specific points within one cycle are repeated. The average vibration acceleration value was highest in the order of X Smart IQ, E Connect S, Endo A class, ENDOIT, and TRAUS ENDO (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Regardless of the type of WEH, greater vibration occurred in the reciprocating motion than in the rotary motion (P < 0.001). In the reciprocating motion, there was a difference in vibration for all handpieces (P < 0.001)

Keyword

accelerometer; vibration; wireless endodontic handpieces

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cordless Endodontic Handpieces. From left to right, X Smart IQ (Dentsply sirona, USA), E Connect S (Eighteeth, China), Endo A Class (Saeyang, Korea), ENDOIT (MicroNX, Korea), TRAUS ENDO (Saeshin, Korea).

  • Fig. 2 Clamped wireless endodontic handpiece.

  • Fig. 3 Representative photograph of vibration test. (A) Tri-axial accelerometer, (B) DAQ Board, Wi-Fi Carrier, (C) NI Sound and Vibration Assistant 2009 software.

  • Fig. 4 Vibration graph of X Smart IQ, Y axis. CW, Clock wise; CCW, Counter clock wise; T, Time period.

  • Fig. 5 Vibration graph of E Connect S, Y axis . CW, Clock wise; CCW, Counter clock wise; T, Time period.

  • Fig. 6 Vibration graph of Endo A Class, Y axis. CW, Clock wise; CCW, Counter clock wise; T, Time period. Vibratory acceleration (g) 10

  • Fig. 7 Vibration graph of ENDOIT, Y axis. CW, Clock wise; CCW, Counter clock wise; T, Time period.

  • Fig. 8 Vibration graph of TRAUS ENDO, Y axis. CW, Clock wise; CCW, Counter clock wise; T, Time period.


Reference

References

1. Giraki M, Bauer A, Barthel C, Rüttermann S, Gerhardt-Szep S. 2016; Problems with a cordless endodontic hand piece when preparing severely curved root canals. J Dent Probl Solut. 3:040–4. DOI: 10.17352/2394-8418.000033.
Article
2. Jain P. 2016. Rotary instruments: importance of speed and torque. Current therapy in endodontics. John Wiley & Sons Inc.;Ames: p. 30–2. DOI: 10.1002/9781119067757.ch3.
3. Hargreaves KM, Berman LH. 2016. Cohen's pathway of the pulp. 11th ed. Elsevier;St. Louis: p. 233. DOI: 10.17352/2394-8418.000033.
4. McCombs G, Russell DM. 2014; Comparison of corded and cordless handpieces on forearm muscle activity, procedure time and ease of use during simulated tooth polishing. J Dent Hyg. 88:386–93. PMID: 25534692.
5. Park SH, Seo HW, Hong CU. 2010; An evaluation of rotational stability in endodontic electronic motors. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent. 35:246–56. DOI: 10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.4.246.
Article
6. Park KH, Yi KH. 2013; Voltage balancing circuit for Liion battery system. J Korea Indust Inform Syst Res. 18:73–80. DOI: 10.9723/jksiis.2013.18.5.073.
Article
7. Newland DE, Ungar EE. 1990; Mechanical vibration analysis and computation. J Acoust Soc Am. 88:2506. DOI: 10.1121/1.400056.
Article
8. Vadhana S, SaravanaKarthikeyan B, Nandini S, Velmurugan N. 2014; Cyclic fatigue resistance of race and Mtwo rotary files in continuous rotation and reciprocating motion. J Endod. 40:995–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.12.010. PMID: 24935551.
9. Jeon YJ, Kim JW, Cho KM, Park SH, Chang HS. 2014; Vibration characteristics of endodontic motors with different motion: reciprocation and conventional rotation. J Korean Dent Assoc. 52:734–43.
10. Finley WR, Hodowanec MM, Holter WG. 3995. An analytical approach to solving motor vibration problems. Available from: https://www.maintenance.org/file-SendAction/fcType/0/fcOid/399590942964504823/filePointer/399590942964856169/fodoid/399590942964856167/Analytical_Approach_to_Solving_Motor_Vibration_Problems.pdf. updated 2021 Jun 15.
11. Yared G. 2008; Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: preliminary observations. Int Endod J. 41:339–44. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2007.01351.x. PMID: 18081803.
Article
12. Park SJ, Park SH, Cho KM, Ji HJ, Lee EH, Kim JW. 2020; Comparison of vibration characteristics of file systems for root canal shaping according to file length. Restor Dent Endod. 45:e51. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e51. PMID: 33294416. PMCID: PMC7691267.
Article
13. Choi DM, Kim JW, Park SH, Cho KM, Kwak SW, Kim HC. 2017; Vibrations generated by several nickeltitanium endodontic file systems during canal shaping in an ex vivo model. J Endod. 43:1197–200. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.03.010. PMID: 28454634.
14. Poole RL, Lea SC, Dyson JE, Shortall AC, Walmsley AD. 2008; Vibration characteristics of dental highspeed turbines and speed-increasing handpieces. J Dent. 36:488–93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.006. PMID: 18468763.
Article
15. Castellini P, Martarelli M, Tomasini E. 2006; Laser doppler vibrometry: Development of advanced solutions answering to technology's needs. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 20:1265–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.015.
Article
16. Park SR, Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW, Kim HC. 2021; Nov. 23. Patient discomfort levels during instrumentation procedure using nickel-titanium files with different kinetic movements. Aust Endod J. doi: 10.1111/aej.12590. [Online ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1111/aej.12590. PMID: 34813131.
Article
17. Kim SG. 2017; Musculoskeletal Disorders by Vibration. Korean Industrial Health Association. 355:34–47.
Full Text Links
  • JDRAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr