J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2022 Oct;48(5):297-302. 10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.5.297.

Sensory change after implant surgery: related factors for recovery

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objectives
This retrospective study aimed to analyze data on nerve damage in patients who complained of sensory changes after dental implant surgery, the clinical results according to proximity of the implant fixture to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) canal, and the factors affecting recovery of sensation.
Materials and Methods
The electronic medical records of 64 patients who had experienced sensory change after implant surgery were reviewed. Patients were classified by sex, age, implant installation sites, recovery rate and the distance between the implant fixture and IAN canal on computed tomography (CT). The distance was classified into Group I (D>2 mm), Group II (2 mm≥D>0 mm), and Group III (D≤0 mm).
Results
The 64 patients were included and the mean age was 57.3±7.3 years. Among the 36 patients who visited our clinic more than two times, 21 patients (58.3%) reported improvement in sensation, 13 patients (36.1%) had no change in sensation, and 2 patients (5.6%) reported worsening sensation. In Group II, symptom improvement was achieved in all patients regardless of the removal of the implant fixture. In Group III, 8 patients (40.0%) had reported symptom improvement with removal of the implant fixture, and 2 patients (33.3%) of recovered patients showed improvement without removal. Removal of the implant fixture in Group III did not result in any significant difference in recovery (P=0.337), although there was a higher possibility of improvement in sensation in removal cases.
Conclusion
Clinicians first should consider removing the fixture when it directly invades the IAN canal. However, in cases of sensory change after dental implant surgery where the drill or implant fixture did not invade the IAN canal, other indirect factors such as flap elevation and damage due to anesthesia should be considered as causes of sensory change. Removal of the implant should be considered with caution in these situations.

Keyword

Dental implant; Adverse effects; Inferior alveolar nerve; Sensation disorders; Prognosis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Distance (D) between the implant fixture and the inferior alveolar nerve canal. A. Group I (D>2 mm). B. Group II (2 mm≥D>0 mm). C. Group III (D≤0 mm).

  • Fig. 2 Comparison of the recovery period between Group II and Group III. A significant difference was found on Fisher’s exact test (P=0.005), and the tendency for earlier recovery was found in Group II. (Group II: 2 mm≥D>0 mm, Group III: D≤0 mm, D: distance between the implant fixture or drilling location)

  • Fig. 3 Comparison of the recovery rate of Group III between removal and non-removal of implant fixtures. A significant difference was not found on Fisher’s exact test (P=0.337), but there was a higher possibility of improvement in sensation in removal cases.


Reference

References

1. Sarikov R, Juodzbalys G. 2014; Inferior alveolar nerve injury after mandibular third molar extraction: a literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 5:e1. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2014.5401. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2014.5401. PMID: 25635208. PMCID: PMC4306319.
Article
2. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G, Sidlauskas A, Galindo-Moreno P. 2013; Inferior alveolar nerve injury associated with implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 24:183–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02314.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02314.x. PMID: 22092662.
Article
3. López-López J, Estrugo-Devesa A, Jané-Salas E, Segura-Egea JJ. 2012; Inferior alveolar nerve injury resulting from overextension of an endodontic sealer: non-surgical management using the GABA analogue pregabalin. Int Endod J. 45:98–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01939.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01939.x. PMID: 21883296.
Article
4. Pogrel MA. 2012; Permanent nerve damage from inferior alveolar nerve blocks: a current update. J Calif Dent Assoc. 40:795–7. PMID: 23316560.
5. Phillips C, Essick G. 2011; Inferior alveolar nerve injury following orthognathic surgery: a review of assessment issues. J Oral Rehabil. 38:547–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02176.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02176.x. PMID: 21058973. PMCID: PMC3094736.
Article
6. Yekta SS, Koch F, Grosjean MB, Esteves-Oliveira M, Stein JM, Ghassemi A, et al. 2010; Analysis of trigeminal nerve disorders after oral and maxillofacial intervention. Head Face Med. 6:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-6-24. DOI: 10.1186/1746-160X-6-24. PMID: 20977760. PMCID: PMC2984556.
Article
7. Pigg M. 2011; Chronic intraoral pain--assessment of diagnostic methods and prognosis. Swed Dent J Suppl. (220):7–91. PMID: 22338784.
8. Choi YC, Kwon JS, Kim ST, Ahn HJ. 2009; Analysis of patients with dysesthesia after mandibular nerve injury. J Oral Med Pain. 34:379–85.
9. Leung YY, Fung PP, Cheung LK. 2012; Treatment modalities of neurosensory deficit after lower third molar surgery: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 70:768–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.032. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.032. PMID: 22177820.
Article
10. Kim JW, Cha IH, Kim SJ, Kim MR. 2012; Which risk factors are associated with neurosensory deficits of inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular third molar extraction? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 70:2508–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.004. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.06.004. PMID: 22901857.
Article
11. Kjølle GK, Bjørnland T. 2013; Low risk of neurosensory dysfunction after mandibular third molar surgery in patients less than 30 years of age. A prospective study following removal of 1220 mandibular third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 116:411–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.024. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.024. PMID: 24035108.
Article
12. Burstein J, Mastin C, Le B. 2008; Avoiding injury to the inferior alveolar nerve by routine use of intraoperative radiographs during implant placement. J Oral Implantol. 34:34–8. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[34:AITTIA]2.0.CO;2. DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[34:AITTIA]2.0.CO;2. PMID: 18390241.
Article
13. Steinberg MJ, Kelly PD. 2015; Implant-related nerve injuries. Dent Clin North Am. 59:357–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden. 2014.10.003. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2014.10.003. PMID: 25835799.
Article
14. Greenstein G, Carpentieri JR, Cavallaro J. 2015; Nerve damage related to implant dentistry: incidence, diagnosis, and management. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 36:652–9. quiz 660. PMID: 26448148.
15. Velasco-Torres M, Padial-Molina M, Avila-Ortiz G, García-Delgado R, Catena A, Galindo-Moreno P. 2017; Inferior alveolar nerve trajectory, mental foramen location and incidence of mental nerve anterior loop. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 22:e630–5. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.21905. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.21905. PMID: 28809376. PMCID: PMC5694187.
Article
16. Jang SI, Paeng JY. 2018; Non-surgical management of inferior alveolar nerve damage after implant installation. J Dent Implant Res. 37:18–22. https://doi.org/10.54527/jdir.2018.37.1.18.
Article
17. Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G. 2011; Injury of the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a literature review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2:e1. https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2011.2101. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2011.2101. PMID: 24421983. PMCID: PMC3886063.
Article
18. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. 2006; The mental foramen and nerve: clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: a literature review. J Periodontol. 77:1933–43. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.060197. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.060197. PMID: 17209776.
Article
19. Voon YS, Patil PG. 2018; Safe zone in anterior mandible related to the genial tubercle for implant osteotomy in a Chinese-Malaysian population: a CBCT study. J Prosthet Dent. 119:568–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.011. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.05.011. PMID: 28838820.
Article
20. Helmi MF, Huang H, Goodson JM, Hasturk H, Tavares M, Natto ZS. 2019; Prevalence of periodontitis and alveolar bone loss in a patient population at Harvard School of Dental Medicine. BMC Oral Health. 19:254. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0925-z. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0925-z. PMID: 31752793. PMCID: PMC6873420.
Article
21. Khawaja N, Renton T. 2009; Case studies on implant removal influencing the resolution of inferior alveolar nerve injury. Br Dent J. 206:365–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.258. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.258. PMID: 19357667.
Article
22. Du Toit J, Gluckman H, Gamil R, Renton T. 2015; Implant injury case series and review of the literature part 1: inferior alveolar nerve injury. J Oral Implantol. 41:e144–51. https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00022. DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-14-00022. PMID: 24945089.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr