J Korean Med Sci.  2022 Oct;37(40):e291. 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e291.

Nationwide Survey for Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
  • 3Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University - Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea

Abstract

Background
Various methods have been implemented for pediatric gastrostomy tube placement. We aimed to investigate the performance status of pediatric gastrostomy in South Korea and to present indications and appropriate methods for domestic situations.
Methods
A survey was conducted among pediatric endoscopists who performed upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Korea. The questionnaire consisted of 16 questions on gastrostomy performance status.
Results
Among the 48 institutions where the survey was applied, 36 (75%) responded. Of the 36 institutions, gastrostomy was performed in 31 (86.1%). The departments in which gastrostomy was performed were pediatrics at 26 institutions (81.3%), surgery at 24 institutions (75.0%), internal medicine at 9 institutions (28.1%), and radiology at 7 institutions (21.9%). There were 18 institutions (66.7%) using the pull method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nine institutions (33.3%) using the push method. When performing gastrostomies, fundoplication procedures were performed in 19 institutions (61.3%), if deemed necessary. However, 12 institutions (38.7%) answered that gastrostomy was always implemented alone. Complications after gastrostomy included buried bumper syndrome, wound infection, leakage, tube migration, and incorrect opening site in the stomach, but the number of cases with complications was very small.
Conclusion
In Korea, a pediatric gastrostomy is implemented in various ways depending on the institution. Clinicians are concerned about choosing the most effective methods with fewer complications after the procedure. In our study, we reported only a few complications. Korea has good accessibility for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy, and this survey showed that it is a safe procedure that can be considered initially in pediatric gastrostomy. This study is expected to help to create optimal pediatric PEG guidelines in Korea.

Keyword

Gastrostomy; Pediatrics; Endoscopic Surgical Procedure; Buried Bumper

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Distribution of institutions of the survey of pediatric gastrostomy procedures in Korea.


Cited by  1 articles

Pediatric Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy in Korea - When? By Whom? How?
Yoon Lee
J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(40):e313.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e313.


Reference

1. Rahnemai-Azar AA, Rahnemaiazar AA, Naghshizadian R, Kurtz A, Farkas DT. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: indications, technique, complications and management. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(24):7739–7751. PMID: 24976711.
Article
2. Homan M, Hauser B, Romano C, Tzivinikos C, Torroni F, Gottrand F, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: an update to the ESPGHAN position paper. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021; 73(3):415–426. PMID: 34155150.
Article
3. de Sousa Magalhães R, Cúrdia Gonçalves T, Sousa-Pinto B, Rosa B, Marinho C, Cotter J. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: dealing with the issue of dislodgement. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020; 55(4):485–491. PMID: 32202441.
Article
4. Sandberg F, Viktorsdóttir MB, Salö M, Stenström P, Arnbjörnsson E. Comparison of major complications in children after laparoscopy-assisted gastrostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2018; 34(12):1321–1327. PMID: 30291404.
Article
5. Zenitani M, Nose S, Sasaki T, Oue T. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopy-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in infants and small children weighing less than 10 kg: a comparison with larger patients. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021; 14(1):44–49. PMID: 32319215.
Article
6. Fraser JD, Aguayo P, Sharp SW, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ, St Peter SD. The safety of laparoscopy in pediatric patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009; 19(5):675–678. PMID: 19645606.
Article
7. Blumenstein I, Shastri YM, Stein J. Gastroenteric tube feeding: techniques, problems and solutions. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(26):8505–8524. PMID: 25024606.
Article
8. Mawatari F, Miyaaki H, Arima T, Ito H, Matsuki K, Fukuda S, et al. Procedure-related complications and survival after gastrostomy: results from a Japanese cohort. Ann Nutr Metab. 2020; 76(6):413–421. PMID: 33626540.
Article
9. Gang MH, Kim JY. Short-term complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy according to the type of technique. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2014; 17(4):214–222. PMID: 25587521.
Article
10. Ota K, Takeuchi T, Masuda D, Sanomura M, Kojima K, Nakanishi Y, et al. Risk factors for postoperative bleeding and early death in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a multicenter retrospective study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022; 37(1):97–103. PMID: 34478183.
Article
11. Lee SW, Lee JH, Cho H, Ha Y, Lim H, Ahn JY, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes associated with pull-type and introducer-type percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies. Clin Endosc. 2014; 47(6):530–537. PMID: 25505719.
Article
12. Osei H, Munoz-Abraham AS, Martino A, Chatoorgoon K, Greenspon J, Fitzpatrick C, et al. To button or not to button? Primary gastrostomy tubes offer no significant advantage over buttons. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2022; 25(3):211–217. PMID: 35611372.
Article
13. Kumar AS, Bani Yaghoub M, Rekab K, Hall M, Attard TM. Pediatric multicenter cohort comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and non-endoscopic gastrostomy technique outcomes. J Investig Med. 2020; 68(2):413–418.
Article
14. Salazar JH, Spanbauer C, Sood MR, Densmore JC, Van Arendonk KJ. Variability in the method of gastrostomy placement in children. Children (Basel). 2020; 7(6):53.
Article
15. Balogh B, Szűcs D, Gavallér G, Rieth A, Kovács T. Laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy reduces major complications in high-risk pediatric patients. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2021; 24(3):273–278. PMID: 34046330.
Article
16. Yoon S, Kim SH, Lee YJ, Park JH, Cho YH, Chung JH. Experience with a hybrid procedure involving laparoscopic fundoplication with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in chronically ill children. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(19):4291. PMID: 34640329.
Article
17. Kim SC. Letter to the editor: optimal method for sedation of pediatric upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. J Korean Med Sci. 2021; 36(35):e254. PMID: 34490758.
Article
18. Jung SO, Moon HS, Kim TH, Park JH, Kim JS, Kang SH, et al. Nutritional impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a retrospective single-center study. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2022; 79(1):12–21. PMID: 35086968.
Article
19. Kidder M, Phen C, Brown J, Kimsey K, Oshrine B, Ghazarian S, et al. Effectiveness and complication rate of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement in pediatric oncology patients. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2021; 24(6):546–554. PMID: 34796099.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr