J Korean Med Sci.  2022 Oct;37(39):e284. 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e284.

Healthcare Policy Agenda for a Sustainable Healthcare System in Korea: Building Consensus Using the Delphi Method

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Public Health, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Division of Healthcare Research & Research Planning, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
The purpose of this study is to suggest priority tasks necessary for building a sustainable healthcare system in Korea based on the Delphi consensus among healthcare professionals.
Methods
Twenty-five items covering the three categories that make up healthcare policy (healthcare demand, supply, and environment) were selected based on a literature evaluation. Email surveys were also analyzed using a two-round modified Delphi method. Of 59 experts, 21 completed the first and second rounds. Each item asked about the degree of importance and urgency, and the answers were rated on a 9-point Likert scale. A coefficient of variation less than 50% for each item in the Delphi survey meant that consensus was reached. Only items that meet a predetermined threshold are prioritized (agreement ≥ 90%, average importance score and urgency score ≥ 6.5).
Results
Eight items that satisfy all three criteria were set as priorities for a sustainable healthcare system. These tasks are “Securing the financial soundness of the National Health Insurance (NHI),” “Solving the problem of low fertility,” “Strengthening response to public health crises such as infectious or environmental diseases,” “Bio-health technology innovation using D.N.A (Data, Network, AI),” “Intensive management of dementia patients,” “Mental healthcare and suicide prevention,” “Reform of the operation structure of the NHI Service,” and “Reform the healthcare delivery system and payment system.”
Conclusion
The eight items for which consensus was reached in this study should be prioritized for Korea’s sustainable healthcare system. Health policy makers will need to put considerable effort into researching and establishing these priorities.

Keyword

Healthcare Policy; Sustainability; Delphi Method; Agenda

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Details of modified Delphi consensus process.


Reference

1. Korea Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Strategic Report of Smart Healthcare Devices and Technology Standards. Cheongju, Korea: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2018.
2. Song JY, Peck KR. Korean Society of Infectious Diseases. A debate on public health responses to COVID-19: focused protection versus sustained suppression. J Korean Med Sci. 2020; 35(49):e433. PMID: 33350189.
Article
3. Choi M, Kim M, Kim JA, Chang H. Building consensus on the priority-setting for national policies in health information technology: a Delphi survey. Healthc Inform Res. 2020; 26(3):229–237. PMID: 32819041.
Article
4. Bevan G, Helderman JK, Wilsford D. Changing choices in health care: implications for equity, efficiency and cost. Health Econ Policy Law. 2010; 5(3):251–267. PMID: 20478104.
Article
5. Kissick WL. Medicine’s Dilemmas: Infinite Needs Versus Finite Resources. London, UK: Yale University Press;1994.
6. World Health Organization. Supporting National Health Policies, Strategies, Plans. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2022.
7. National Health Service. The NHS Long Term Plan. London, UK: National Health Service;2019.
8. Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare. Japan Vision: Health Care 2035. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare;2015.
9. Lee HJ, Kim S, Jang SI, Park EC. Current status of health and welfare long-term plans in Korea. Health Policy Manag. 2019; 29(3):368–373.
10. Austin P, Henderson S, Power I, Jirwe M, Alander T. An international Delphi study to assess the need for multiaxial criteria in diagnosis and management of functional gastrointestinal disorders. J Psychosom Res. 2013; 75(2):128–134. PMID: 23915768.
Article
11. Rayens MK, Hahn EJ. Building consensus using the policy Delphi method. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2000; 1(4):308–315.
Article
12. Park EC, Lee HJ, Kim S. Roadmap for Establishing Health Care System in Korea. Seoul, Korea: National Academy of Medicine of Korea;2019.
13. Kleczkowski BM, Roemer MI. National Health Systems and Their Reorientation Towards Health for All: Guidelines for Policy-Making. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;1984.
14. Park EC, Jang SI. The diagnosis of healthcare policy problems in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2012; 55(10):932–939.
Article
15. Park M, Youn HM, Park EC. Position value for relative comparison of healthcare status of Korea in 2019: comparison with countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health Policy Manag. 2022; 32(1):113–121.
16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Health Statistics 2022. Updated 2022. Accessed July 13, 2022. https://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/health-data.htm .
17. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2000: Health Systems: Improving Performance. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;2000.
18. Arah OA, Westert GP, Hurst J, Klazinga NS. A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006; 18(Suppl 1):5–13. PMID: 16954510.
Article
19. Aday LA. Evaluating the Healthcare System: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity. Washington, D.C., USA: Health Administration Press;2004.
20. Seke K, Petrovic N, Jeremic V, Vukmirovic J, Kilibarda B, Martic M. Sustainable development and public health: rating European countries. BMC Public Health. 2013; 13(1):77. PMID: 23356822.
Article
21. Parente ST. Factors contributing to higher health care spending in the united states compared with other high-income countries. JAMA. 2018; 319(10):988–990. PMID: 29536080.
Article
22. Gusmano MK, Laugesen M, Rodwin VG, Brown LD. Getting the price right: how some countries control spending in a fee-for-service system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020; 39(11):1867–1874. PMID: 33136495.
Article
23. Putrik P, Jessup R, Buchbinder R, Glasziou P, Karnon J, O Connor DA. Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders. Aust Health Rev. 2021; 45(4):425–432. PMID: 33731250.
Article
24. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Health at a Glance 2021. Paris, France: OECD Publishing;2021.
25. Hyun KR, Kang S, Lee S. Population aging and healthcare expenditure in Korea. Health Econ. 2016; 25(10):1239–1251. PMID: 26085120.
Article
26. Park EC. Moon Jae-in Government’s plan for benefit expansion in National Health Insurance. Health Policy Manag. 2017; 27(3):191–198.
27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Fiscal Sustainability of Health Systems: Bridging Health and Finance Perspectives. Paris, France: OECD Publishing;2015.
28. Park K, Park J, Kwon YD, Kang Y, Noh JW. Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: universal healthcare system. Health Policy. 2016; 120(6):621–629. PMID: 26831040.
Article
29. Kang MS, Jang HS, Lee M, Park EC. Sustainability of Korean National Health Insurance. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27(Suppl):S21–S24. PMID: 22661866.
Article
30. The Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS). The Population Trend Research. Daejeon, Korea: KOSIS;2021.
31. Lee SJ, Li L, Hwang JY. After 20 years of low fertility, where are the obstetrician-gynecologists? Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2021; 64(5):407–418. PMID: 34265193.
Article
32. Kluge HH, Wickramasinghe K, Rippin HL, Mendes R, Peters DH, Kontsevaya A, et al. Prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in the COVID-19 response. Lancet. 2020; 395(10238):1678–1680. PMID: 32401713.
Article
33. Fuchs VR. Health care policy after the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020; 324(3):233–234. PMID: 32530458.
Article
34. Baumgart DC. Digital advantage in the COVID-19 response: perspective from Canada’s largest integrated digitalized healthcare system. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3(1):114. PMID: 32923691.
Article
35. Kim CH, Park JO, Park CB, Kim SC, Kim SJ, Hong KJ. Scientific framework for research on disaster and mass casualty incident in Korea: building consensus using Delphi method. J Korean Med Sci. 2014; 29(1):122–128. PMID: 24431916.
Article
36. Choi JH, Moon J, Kim S, Bae H, Lee J, Choe YJ. Expert consensus on COVID-19 vaccination in Korean adolescents: a modified Delphi survey. J Korean Med Sci. 2022; 37(9):e69. PMID: 35257524.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr