Prog Med Phys.  2022 Sep;33(3):25-35. 10.14316/pmp.2022.33.3.25.

Comparison of Dose Statistics of IntensityModulated Radiation Therapy Plan from Varian Eclipse Treatment Planning System with Novel Python-Based Indigenously Developed Software

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Thangam Cancer Hospital, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India
  • 2PG & Research, Department of Physics, Jamal Mohamed College (Autonomous), Affiliated to Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India
  • 3Department of Medical Physics, Hind Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 4Department of Radiation Oncology, KLES Belgaum Cancer Hospital, Belgaum, Karnataka, India
  • 5Department of Medical Physics, Bharathidasan University,Trichy, India

Abstract

Purpose
Planning for radiotherapy relies on implicit estimation of the probability of tumor control and the probability of complications in adjacent normal tissues for a given dose distribution.
Methods
The aim of this pilot study was to reconstruct dose-volume histograms (DVHs) from text files generated by the Eclipse treatment planning system developed by Varian Medical Systems and to verify the integrity and accuracy of the dose statistics.
Results
We further compared dose statistics for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the head and neck between the Eclipse software and software developed in-house. The dose statistics data obtained from the Python software were consistent, with deviations from the Eclipse treatment planning system found to be within acceptable limits.
Conclusions
The in-house software was able to provide indices of hotness and coldness for treatment planning and store statistical data generated by the software in Oracle databases. We believe the findings of this pilot study may lead to more accurate evaluations in planning for radiotherapy.

Keyword

Matrix laboratory; Python; Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; 3 dimensional conformal radiation therapy; Normal tissue complication probability; Tumor control probability

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Energy fluence of treatment fields after treatment plan optimization.

  • Fig. 2 Dose-volume histograms with target volumes for organs at risk in Eclipse treatment planning system.

  • Fig. 3 Minimum dose statistics of the organ at risk calculated with Eclipse and Python software. (a) Minimum dose statistics of brain stem. (b) Minimum dose statistics of spinal cord. (c) Minimum dose statistics of parotid right. (d) Minimum dose statistics of parotid left.

  • Fig. 4 Maximum dose statistics of the organ at risk calculated with Eclipse and Python software. (a) Maximum dose statistics of brain stem. (b) Maximum dose statistics of spinal cord. (c) Maximum dose statistics of parotid right. (d) Maximum dose statistics of parotid left.

  • Fig. 5 Mean dose statistics of the organ at risk calculated with Eclipse and Python software. (a) Mean dose statistics of brain stem. (b) Mean dose statistics of spinal cord. (c) Mean dose statistics of parotid right. (d) Mean dose statistics of parotid left.

  • Fig. 6 Screenshot of the application program with dose statistics and hot and cold indices.

  • Fig. 7 Indices of hotness and coldness from simultaneously integrated boost-intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) treatment plans for the entire target volume. PTV, planning target volume.


Reference

References

1. Zhao B, Joiner MC, Orton CG, Burmeister J. 2010; "SABER": a new software tool for radiotherapy treatment plan evaluation. Med Phys. 37:5586–5592. DOI: 10.1118/1.3497152. PMID: 21158270.
Article
2. Deasy JO, Blanco AI, Clark VH. 2003; CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. Med Phys. 30:979–985. DOI: 10.1118/1.1568978. PMID: 12773007.
Article
3. The Histogram Analysis in Radiation Therapy (HART). 2014. An open source software system designed for clinical and research applications in radiation therapy (2008-2014). HART Research Group;Chicago: DOI: 10.1118/1.1568978.
4. El Naqa I, Suneja G, Lindsay PE, Hope AJ, Alaly JR, Vicic M, et al. 2006; Dose response explorer: an integrated open-source tool for exploring and modelling radiotherapy dose-volume outcome relationships. Phys Med Biol. 51:5719–5735. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/22/001. PMID: 17068361.
Article
5. Sanchez-Nieto B, Nahum AE. 2000; BIOPLAN: software for the biological evaluation of. Radiotherapy treatment plans. Med Dosim. 25:71–76. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-3947(00)00031-5. PMID: 10856684.
Article
6. Bruzzaniti V, Abate A, Pedrini M, Benassi M, Strigari L. 2011; IsoBED: a tool for automatic calculation of biologically equivalent fractionation schedules in radiotherapy using IMRT with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 30:52. DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-52. PMID: 21554675. PMCID: PMC3117739.
Article
7. Lee S, Cao YJ. Kim CY: Physical and radiobiological evaluation of radiotherapy treatment plan. 2015. Evolution of Ionizing Radiation Research. IntechOpen;London: DOI: 10.5772/60846.
8. Pyakuryal A, Myint WK, Gopalakrishnan M, Jang S, Logemann JA, Mittal BB. 2010; A computational tool for the efficient analysis of dose-volume histograms from radiation therapy treatment plans. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 11:3013. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3013. PMID: 20160690. PMCID: PMC2897015.
9. Kim JS, Yoon M, Park SY, Shin JS, Shin E, Ju SG, et al. 2009; A dose volume histogram analyzer program for external beam radiotherapy. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 27:240–248. DOI: 10.3857/jkstro.2009.27.4.240.
Article
10. Park YK, Park S, Wu HG, Kim S. 2014; A new plan quality index for dose painting radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 15:4941. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i4.4941. PMID: 25207424. PMCID: PMC5875497.
Article
11. Lee TF, Chao PJ, Wang HY, Hsu HC, Chang P, Chen WC. 2012; Normal tissue complication probability model parameter estimation for xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients based on scintigraphy and quality of life assessments. BMC Cancer. 12:567. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-567. PMID: 23206972. PMCID: PMC3536655.
Article
12. Warkentin B, Stavrev P, Stavreva N, Field C, Fallone BG. 2004; A TCP-NTCP estimation module using DVHs and known radiobiological models and parameter sets. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 5:50–63. DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v5i1.1970. PMID: 15753933. PMCID: PMC5723441.
Article
13. Alfonso JC, Herrero MA, Núñez L. 2015; A dose-volume histogram based decision-support system for dosimetric comparison of radiotherapy treatment plans. Radiat Oncol. 10:263. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0569-3. PMID: 26715096. PMCID: PMC4696205.
Article
14. Gay HA, Niemierko A. 2007; A free program for calculating EUD-based NTCP and TCP in external beam radiotherapy. Phys Med. 23:115–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2007.07.001. PMID: 17825595.
Article
15. Oinam AS, Singh L, Shukla A, Ghoshal S, Kapoor R, Sharma SC. 2011; Dose volume histogram analysis and comparison of different radiobiological models using in-house developed software. J Med Phys. 36:220–229. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.89971. PMID: 22228931. PMCID: PMC3249733.
Article
16. Pasciuti K, Iaccarino G, Strigari L, Malatesta T, Benassi M, Di Nallo AM, et al. 2011; Tissue heterogeneity in IMRT dose calculation for lung cancer. Med Dosim. 36:219–227. DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.03.008. PMID: 20970989.
Article
17. Kutcher GJ, Burman C, Brewster L, Goitein M, Mohan R. 1991; Histogram reduction method for calculating complication probabilities for three-dimensional treatment planning evaluations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 21:137–146. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(91)90173-2. PMID: 2032884.
Article
18. Kataria T, Sharma K, Subramani V, Karrthick KP, Bisht SS. 2012; Homogeneity Index: an objective tool for assessment of conformal radiation treatments. J Med Phys. 37:207–213. DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.103606. PMID: 23293452. PMCID: PMC3532749.
Article
19. Cheung MLM, Kan MWK, Yeung VTY, Poon DMC, Kam MKM, Lee LKY, et al. 2021; Analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma stereotactic body radiation therapy dose prescription method using uncomplicated tumor control probability model. Adv Radiat Oncol. 6:100739. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100739. PMID: 34355107. PMCID: PMC8321929.
Article
20. Kutcher GJ, Burman C. 1989; Calculation of complication probability factors for non-uniform normal tissue irradiation: the effective volume method. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 16:1623–1630. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90972-3. PMID: 2722599.
Article
21. Marks LB, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Constine LS, Eisbruch A, et al. 2010; Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 76(3 Suppl):S10–S19. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754. PMID: 20171502. PMCID: PMC4041542.
Article
22. Wu Q, Manning M, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Mohan R. 2000; The potential for sparing of parotids and escalation of biologically effective dose with intensity-modulated radiation treatments of head and neck cancers: a treatment design study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 46:195–205. DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00304-1. PMID: 10656393.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PMP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr