J Korean Soc Emerg Med.
2022 Aug;33(4):38-48.
Analysis of work, life, and occupation perception of emergency physician by generations
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Korea
- 4Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
- 5Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- 6Department of Medical Education, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
- 7Department of Emergency Medicine, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital, Wouju, Korea
- 8Department of Emergency Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- 9Department of Emergency Medicine, KS Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
- 10Department of Emergency Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- 11Department of Emergency Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- 12Department of Emergency Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- 13Department of Emergency Medicine, Yeosu Jeonnam Hospital, Yeosu, Korea
- 14Department of Emergency Medicine, Hwahong Hospital, Suwon, Korea
- 15Department of Emergency Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
- 16Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
Abstract
Objective
As the history of emergency medicine grows longer, emergency medicine specialists are observed to comprise various age groups. There have been no prior studies on the generation shift analysis of emergency medicine specialists. Our study is designed to identify the characteristics of each generation and predict the generation shift in emergency medicine physicians.
Methods
The analysis was based on the results of the 2020 survey of emergency medicine specialists. The study was conducted on 1,307 respondents and finally, the responses of 967 people were analyzed after excluding 199 who were not in charge of emergency room treatments and 141 who gave incomplete responses. The respondents were divided into four groups based on the following generations: first generation (1996-1999), second generation (2000-2008), third generation (2009-2014), and fourth generation (2015-2020), classified by the year in which they acquired their emergency medicine board license. The intergenerational difference analysis was done using the Kruskall-Wallis test.
Results
The first generation was characterized by a high proportion of university hospital professors, large non-clinical activity hours, a few night shifts, higher social contributions, low satisfaction with the training and education environment, and a high retirement age compared to the later generations. In the second generation, the characteristics of the first, third, and fourth generations were generally mixed. The third and fourth generations showed similar characteristics overall, though there were differences in some categories.
Conclusion
There were significant differences by generation in the working environments, motivation for application, and retirement age. This is the first study that quantifies generational differences. Considering these trends, a discussion about the work environment needs to be initiated.