Ann Surg Treat Res.  2022 Sep;103(3):129-144. 10.4174/astr.2022.103.3.129.

The different prognostic impact of age according to individual molecular subtypes in breast cancer

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
Young age at diagnosis has been considered a poor prognostic factor. However, considering young age itself as an independent poor prognostic factor for all breast cancers is unwarranted. We analyzed the different prognostic effects of age as a prognostic factor according to molecular subtype.
Methods
We retrieved data from 1,819 patients with primary breast cancer at the breast cancer center between 2007 and 2012. We classified each molecular subtype in 3 age cohorts (<40, 40–50, and >50 years). The associations of age and molecular subtypes with relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were assessed.
Results
Patients aged <40 years showed a poor histologic grade, hormone receptor negative expression than older patients, and had a higher proportion of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (P < 0.001). This was thought to have led to a significantly shorter RFS than that of older patients (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis according to molecular subtypes, the poorer RFS was observed only in patients aged <40 years with luminal type breast cancer (P < 0.001). Age was an independent prognostic factor of RFS in luminal-type breast cancer (P = 0.001). However, no difference in RFS between age groups was found for patients with other subtypes (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression, TNBC). No significant effect between age groups was found in DSS for patients with all molecular subtypes.
Conclusion
Age at diagnosis of breast cancer affected prognosis differently according to molecular subtype. Age itself is not an independent prognostic factor. Age of <40 years showed a limited worse prognostic impact of recurrence in luminal type breast cancer only.

Keyword

Age; Breast neoplasms; Immunohistochemistry; Prognosis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in all breast cancer patients. (A) RFS according to age at diagnosis, (B) DSS according to age at diagnosis, (C) RFS according to molecular subtypes, and (D) DSS according to molecular subtypes. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.

  • Fig. 2 Kaplan-Meier analysis of relapse-free survival (RFS) according to age at diagnosis in each molecular subtype. (A) Luminal A breast cancer, (B) luminal B breast cancer, (C) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression breast cancer, and (D) triple-negative breast cancer.

  • Fig. 3 Kaplan-Meier analysis of disease-specific survival (DSS) according to age at diagnosis in each molecular subtype. (A) Luminal A breast cancer, (B) luminal B breast cancer, (C) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression breast cancer, and (D) triple-negative breast cancer.


Reference

1. Axelrod D, Smith J, Kornreich D, Grinstead E, Singh B, Cangiarella J, et al. Breast cancer in young women. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206:1193–1203. PMID: 18501818.
Article
2. Peng R, Wang S, Shi Y, Liu D, Teng X, Qin T, et al. Patients 35 years old or younger with operable breast cancer are more at risk for relapse and survival: a retrospective matched case-control study. Breast. 2011; 20:568–573. PMID: 21843944.
Article
3. Kohler BA, Sherman RL, Howlader N, Jemal A, Ryerson AB, Henry KA, et al. Annual report to the Nation on the Status Of Cancer, 1975-2011, featuring incidence of breast cancer subtypes by race/ethnicity, poverty, and state. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107:djv048. PMID: 25825511.
Article
4. DeSantis C, Howlader N, Cronin KA, Jemal A. Breast cancer incidence rates in U.S. women are no longer declining. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20:733–739. PMID: 21357727.
Article
5. Partridge AH, Hughes ME, Warner ET, Ottesen RA, Wong YN, Edge SB, et al. Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34:3308–3314. PMID: 27480155.
Article
6. Tang LC, Jin X, Yang HY, He M, Chang H, Shao ZM, et al. Luminal B subtype: a key factor for the worse prognosis of young breast cancer patients in China. BMC Cancer. 2015; 15:201. PMID: 25885213.
Article
7. Min SY, Kim Z, Hur MH, Yoon CS, Park EH, Jung KW, et al. The basic facts of Korean breast cancer in 2013: results of a nationwide survey and breast cancer registry database. J Breast Cancer. 2016; 19:1–7. PMID: 27066090.
Article
8. Beadle BM, Woodward WA, Buchholz TA. The impact of age on outcome in early-stage breast cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2011; 21:26–34. PMID: 21134651.
Article
9. Wray CJ, Phatak UR, Robinson EK, Wiatek RL, Rieber AG, Gonzalez A, et al. The effect of age on race-related breast cancer survival disparities. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:2541–2547. PMID: 23435633.
Article
10. Zhou P, Recht A. Young age and outcome for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004; 101:1264–1274. PMID: 15316900.
Article
11. Ribnikar D, Ribeiro JM, Pinto D, Sousa B, Pinto AC, Gomes E, et al. Breast cancer under age 40: a different approach. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015; 16:16. PMID: 25796377.
Article
12. Goldhirsch A, Winer EP, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thürlimann B, et al. Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24:2206–2223. PMID: 23917950.
Article
13. Wei JT, Huang WH, Du CW, Qiu SQ, Wei XL, Liu J, et al. Clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of young breast cancers in Eastern Guangdong of China. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:5360. PMID: 24942640.
Article
14. Chia KS, Du WB, Sankaranarayanan R, Sankila R, Wang H, Lee J, et al. Do younger female breast cancer patients have a poorer prognosis? Results from a population-based survival analysis. Int J Cancer. 2004; 108:761–765. PMID: 14696104.
Article
15. Brandt J, Garne JP, Tengrup I, Manjer J. Age at diagnosis in relation to survival following breast cancer: a cohort study. World J Surg Oncol. 2015; 13:33. PMID: 25889186.
Article
16. Liedtke C, Rody A, Gluz O, Baumann K, Beyer D, Kohls EB, et al. The prognostic impact of age in different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015; 152:667–673. PMID: 26195120.
Article
17. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Bodian C, Brower ST. Stage 0 to stage III breast cancer in young women. J Am Coll Surg. 2000; 190:523–529. PMID: 10801018.
18. Lee MK, Varzi LA, Chung DU, Cao MA, Gornbein J, Apple SK, et al. The effect of young age in hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:325715. PMID: 26351632.
Article
19. Jenkins EO, Deal AM, Anders CK, Prat A, Perou CM, Carey LA, et al. Age-specific changes in intrinsic breast cancer subtypes: a focus on older women. Oncologist. 2014; 19:1076–1083. PMID: 25142841.
Article
20. Ring A, Sestak I, Baum M, Howell A, Buzdar A, Dowsett M, et al. Influence of comorbidities and age on risk of death without recurrence: a retrospective analysis of the arimidex, tamoxifen alone or in combination trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:4266–4272. PMID: 21990403.
Article
21. Muss HB, Woolf S, Berry D, Cirrincione C, Weiss RB, Budman D, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy in older and younger women with lymph node-positive breast cancer. JAMA. 2005; 293:1073–1081. PMID: 15741529.
Article
22. Sheridan W, Scott T, Caroline S, Yvonne Z, Vanessa B, David V, et al. Breast cancer in young women: have the prognostic implications of breast cancer subtypes changed over time? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014; 147:617–629. PMID: 25209005.
Article
23. Kim EK, Noh WC, Han W, Noh DY. Prognostic significance of young age (<35 years) by subtype based on ER, PR, and HER2 status in breast cancer: a nationwide registry-based study. World J Surg. 2011; 35:1244–1253. PMID: 21472372.
Article
24. Kim SW, Chun M, Han S, Jung YS, Choi JH, Kang SY, et al. Young age is associated with increased locoregional recurrence in node-positive breast cancer with luminal subtypes. Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 49:484–493. PMID: 27554479.
Article
25. Lian W, Fu F, Lin Y, Lu M, Chen B, Yang P, et al. The impact of young age for prognosis by subtype in women with early breast cancer. Sci Rep. 2017; 7:11625. PMID: 28912475.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ASTR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr