Arch Hand Microsurg.  2022 Sep;27(3):274-278. 10.12790/ahm.22.0033.

Persistent retrograde venous-lymphatic reflux in side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomosis in a lower extremity with lymphedema: a case report

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

End-to-end (ETE) and side-to-end (STE) anastomosis are two common configurations of lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA); however, it remains inconclusive which method is better. A 62-year-old man with lower extremity lymphedema underwent LVA with the STE method on the ankle. When the lymphatic vessel was cut for additional LVA at the proximal lower leg, blood drained out from the cut end of a lymphatic vessel, which suggested venous-lymphatic reflux at the STE anastomosis at the ankle. Because the reflux continued until 1 hour after the previous LVA at the ankle, the STE anastomosis at the ankle was re-explored and converted to ETE by ligation of the proximal lymphatic vessel. Reverse venous-lymphatic reflux was corrected, and a lymphovenous shunt was created immediately after the ligation. The current case suggests that STE anastomosis can be inferior to ETE anastomosis for creating a lymphovenous shunt when venous backflow exists.

Keyword

Lymphedema; Lymphovenous shunt; Lymphaticovenous anastomosis; Side to end; End to end

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. (A) Anterior and (B) posterior views. After injecting radiotracer into the subcutaneous area of the first and second interdigital spaces of both feet, whole-body imaging was performed at 1 hour. Lymphatic obstruction in the left lower extremity was revealed.

  • Fig. 2. Intraoperative image. Yellow arrows indicate the lymphatic vessel, and red arrows indicate the vein. (A) Side-to-end (STE) lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) at the ankle incision. The lymphatic vessel of the ankle incision is indicated by a yellow arrow. Lymphovenous shunt was not noted, and retrograde venous-lymphatic reflux was observed. (B) After about 30 minutes, venous flow through the cut end of the lymphatic vessel was detected in the proximal lower leg (yellow arrow). The venous outflow through the proximal lymphatic vessels continued and was not corrected during surgery. (C) The LVA site at the ankle was re-explored. Proximal end ligation of the lymphatic vessel on the ankle incision site was performed to convert STE into end-to-end anastomosis, which created a lymphovenous shunt. (D) Left lower leg showing the incision sites for LVA.

  • Fig. 3. (A) Preoperative image. (B) Postoperative 4-month image.


Reference

References

1. Koshima I, Inagawa K, Urushibara K, Moriguchi T. Supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis for the treatment of lymphedema in the upper extremities. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000; 16:437–42.
2. Visconti G, Salgarello M, Hayashi A. The recipient venule in supermicrosurgical lymphaticovenular anastomosis: flow dynamic classification and correlation with surgical outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2018; 34:581–9.
3. Yang JC, Wu SC, Chiang MH, Lin WC. Targeting reflux-free veins with a vein visualizer to identify the ideal recipient vein preoperatively for optimal lymphaticovenous anastomosis in treating lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141:793–7.
4. Akita S, Yamaji Y, Tokumoto H, et al. Prevention of venous reflux with full utilization of venoplasty in lymphaticovenular anastomosis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020; 73:537–43.
5. AlJindan FK, Lin CY, Cheng MH. Comparison of outcomes between side-to-end and end-to-end lymphovenous anastomoses for early-grade extremity Lymphedema. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144:486–96.
6. Yamamoto T, Narushima M, Kikuchi K, et al. Lambda-shaped anastomosis with intravascular stenting method for safe and effective lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:1987–92.
7. Suzuki Y, Sakuma H, Ihara J, Shimizu Y. Proximal ligation after the side-to-end anastomosis recovery technique for lymphaticovenous anastomosis. Arch Plast Surg. 2019; 46:344–9.
8. Yang JC, Wu SC, Lin WC, Chiang MH, Hsieh CH. Reversing venous-lymphatic reflux following side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomosis with ligation of the proximal lymphatic vessel. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74:407–47.
9. Dean SM, Valenti E, Hock K, Leffler J, Compston A, Abraham WT. The clinical characteristics of lower extremity lymphedema in 440 patients. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020; 8:851–9.
10. Seki Y, Kajikawa A, Yamamoto T, Takeuchi T, Terashima T, Kurogi N. The dynamic-lymphaticovenular anastomosis method for breast cancer treatment-related lymphedema: Creation of functional lymphaticovenular anastomoses with use of preoperative dynamic ultrasonography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72:62–70.
Full Text Links
  • AHM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr