Arch Hand Microsurg.  2022 Jun;27(2):171-179. 10.12790/ahm.22.0006.

Forearm replantation: pearls and pitfalls

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, SNU Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea

Abstract

Forearm replantation is a challenging procedure for both patients and medical professionals. High survival rates are now being achieved owing to developments in microsurgical techniques. However, patient expectations for a “functional hand” are ever-increasing. To obtain satisfacto-ry functional results following major limb replantation, it is important to reduce the ischemic time. During forearm replantation, the time from the beginning of surgery to the anastomosis of the artery should be minimized. This step includes anesthesia, wound debridement, and bone fixation, which are key factors in choosing the most efficient method and reducing the time needed. Herein, we review the prognostic factors and report the general operative procedures for forearm replantation using our proposed surgical technique.

Keyword

Forearm; Upper extremity; Prostheses and implants; Replantation; Amputation

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Forearm amputation. (A) Photograph showing a 24-year-old male with an amputated forearm after a car accident. (B) We used a 5-hole reconstruction plate and external fixator for bone fixation during replantation surgery. It took 120 minutes from the start of the operation to artery anastomosis, and the total ischemia time was 7 hours. The time required for bone shortening and plate fixation was 30 minutes. (C) The external fixator was removed 6 weeks after surgery and followed by skin grafting. (D) For hand function, a free functional muscle graft using the gracilis muscle was performed 15 months after surgery. (E). Bone union was achieved without secondary bone fixation. (F) At the last follow-up at 19 months, Chen Grade II success (total range of motion, ≥60%; muscle strength, ≥M4; sensibility, ≥2; back to work) was observed. Written informed consent for publication of the clinical images was obtained from the patient.

  • Fig. 2. Forearm amputation.


Reference

References

1. Malt RA, Mckhann C. Replantation of severed arms. JAMA. 1964; 189:716–22.
Article
2. Graham B, Adkins P, Tsai TM, Firrell J, Breidenbach WC. Major replantation versus revision amputation and prosthetic fitting in the upper extremity: a late functional outcomes study. J Hand Surg Am. 1998; 23:783–91.
Article
3. Gold AH, Lee GW. Upper extremity replantation: current concepts and patient selection. J Trauma. 1981; 21:551–7.
4. Prucz RB, Friedrich JB. Upper extremity replantation: current concepts. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133:333–42.
5. Yaffe B, Hutt D, Yaniv Y, Engel J. Major upper extremity replantations. J Hand Microsurg. 2009; 1:63–7.
Article
6. Otto IA, Kon M, Schuurman AH, van Minnen LP. Replantation versus prosthetic fitting in traumatic arm amputations: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2015; 10:e0137729.
Article
7. Sabapathy SR, Venkatramani H, Bharathi RR, Bhardwaj P. Replantation surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36:1104–10.
Article
8. Tintle SM, Baechler MF, Nanos GP 3rd, Forsberg JA, Potter BK. Traumatic and trauma-related amputations: part II: upper extremity and future directions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92:2934–45.
9. Kamarul T, Mansor A, Robson N, Albusaidi SH, Suhaeb AM, Samsudin EZ. Replantation and revascularization of amputated upper limb appendages outcome and predicting the factors influencing the success rates of these procedures in a tertiary hospital: an 8-year retrospective, cross-sectional study. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2018; 26:2309499017749983.
Article
10. Leclère FM, Mathys L, Juon B, Franz T, Unglaub F, Vögelin E. Macroreplantations of the upper extremity: a series of 11 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012; 132:1797–805.
Article
11. Win TS, Henderson J. Management of traumatic amputations of the upper limb. BMJ. 2014; 348:g255.
Article
12. Iorio ML. Hand, wrist, forearm, and arm replantation. Hand Clin. 2019; 35:143–54.
Article
13. Medling BD, Bueno RA Jr, Russell RC, Neumeister MW. Replantation outcomes. Clin Plast Surg. 2007; 34:177–85.
Article
14. Sabapathy SR, Venkatramani H, Bharathi RR, Dheenadhayalan J, Bhat VR, Rajasekaran S. Technical considerations and functional outcome of 22 major replantations (The BSSH Douglas Lamb Lecture, 2005). J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007; 32:488–501.
Article
15. Woo SH. Practical tips to improve efficiency and success in upper limb replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144:878e–911e.
Article
16. Ashjian P, Chen CM, Pusic A, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ. The effect of postoperative anticoagulation on microvascular thrombosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59:36–40.
Article
17. Khouri RK, Cooley BC, Kunselman AR, et al. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102:711–21.
Article
18. Nikolis A, Tahiri Y, St-Supery V, et al. Intravenous heparin use in digital replantation and revascularization: the Quebec Provincial Replantation program experience. Microsurgery. 2011; 31:421–7.
Article
19. Hanasono MM, Butler CE. Prevention and treatment of thrombosis in microvascular surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2008; 24:305–14.
Article
20. van Adrichem LN, Hovius SE, van Strik R, van der Meulen JC. The acute effect of cigarette smoking on the microcirculation of a replanted digit. J Hand Surg Am. 1992; 17:230–4.
Article
21. Dec W. A meta-analysis of success rates for digit replantation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2006; 10:124–9.
Article
22. Waikakul S, Sakkarnkosol S, Vanadurongwan V, Un-nanuntana A. Results of 1018 digital replantations in 552 patients. Injury. 2000; 31:33–40.
Article
23. Li J, Guo Z, Zhu Q, et al. Fingertip replantation: determinants of survival. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122:833–9.
Article
24. Sanmartin M, Fernandes F, Lajoie AS, Gupta A. Analysis of prognostic factors in ring avulsion injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2004; 29:1028–37.
Article
25. Daoutis NK, Gerostathopoulos N, Efstathopoulos D, Misitzis D, Bouchlis G, Anagnostou S. Major amputation of the upper extremity: functional results after replantation/revascularization in 47 cases. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1995; 264:7–8.
Article
26. Fufa D, Lin CH, Lin YT, Hsu CC, Chuang CC, Lin CH. Secondary reconstructive surgery following major upper extremity replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134:713–20.
Article
27. Wang SH, Young KF, Wei JN. Replantation of severed limbs: clinical analysis of 91 cases. J Hand Surg Am. 1981; 6:311–8.
28. Atzei A, Pignatti M, Maria Baldrighi C, Maranzano M, Cugola L. Long-term results of replantation of the proximal forearm following avulsion amputation. Microsurgery. 2005; 25:293–8.
Article
29. Märdian S, Krapohl BD, Roffeis J, Disch AC, Schaser KD, Schwabe P. Complete major amputation of the upper extremity: early results and initial treatment algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 78:586–93.
30. Mattiassich G, Rittenschober F, Dorninger L, et al. Long-term outcome following upper extremity replantation after major traumatic amputation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18:77.
Article
31. Tamai S. Twenty years’ experience of limb replantation: review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg Am. 1982; 7:549–56.
32. Zhong-Wei C, Meyer VE, Kleinert HE, Beasley RW. Present indications and contraindications for replantation as reflected by long-term functional results. Orthop Clin North Am. 1981; 12:849–70.
Article
33. Russell RC, O’Brien BM, Morrison WA, Pamamull G, MacLeod A. The late functional results of upper limb revascularization and replantation. J Hand Surg Am. 1984; 9:623–33.
Article
34. Gulgonen A, Ozer K. Long-term results of major upper extremity replantations. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012; 37:225–32.
Article
35. The Hoang N, Hai LH, Staudenmaier R, Hoehnke C. Complete middle forearm amputations after avulsion injuries: microsurgical replantation results in Vietnamese patients. J Trauma. 2009; 66:1167–72.
36. Sugun TS, Ozaksar K, Ada S, et al. Long-term results of major upper extremity replantations. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009; 43:206–13.
Article
37. Shauver MJ, Chung KC. The Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire after 15 years of field trial. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131:779e–787e.
Article
38. Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in carpal tunnel surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2005; 30:81–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr