Cancer Res Treat.  2022 Jul;54(3):793-802. 10.4143/crt.2021.769.

Usefulness of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Based on Pulmonary Function Tests and Muscle Analysis Using Computed Tomography Images

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Pathology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
The usefulness of rehabilitation in patients with reduced lung function before lung surgery remains unclear, and there is no adequate method for evaluating the effect of rehabilitation. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of rehabilitation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lung cancer surgery.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of NSCLC patients at Korea University Guro Hospital between 2018 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they underwent rehabilitation. Pulmonary function test (PFT) data and muscle determined using chest computed tomography (CT) images were analyzed. Because the baseline characteristics were different between the two groups, propensity score matching was performed.
Results
Of 325 patients, 75 (23.1%) and 250 (76.9%) were included in the rehabilitation and non-rehabilitation (control) groups, respectively. The rehabilitation group had a worse general condition at baseline. After propensity score matching, 45 patients remained in each group. Pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, %) (p=0.001) and the Hounsfield unit of erector spinae muscle (p=0.001) were better preserved in the rehabilitation group. Muscle loss of 3.4% and 0.6% was observed in the control and rehabilitation groups, respectively (p=0.003). In addition, the incidence of embolic events was lower in the rehabilitation group (p=0.044).
Conclusion
Pulmonary rehabilitation is useful in patients with NSCLC undergoing lung surgery. Pulmonary rehabilitation preserves lung function, muscle and reduces embolic events after surgery. Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended for patients with NSCLC undergoing surgery.

Keyword

Non-small-cell lung carcinoma; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Pulmonary surgical procedures; Pulmonary rehabilitation

Figure

  • Fig. 1 HUESMcsa calculation. We drew the erector spinae muscles (first lumbar level) with a green line. For each computed tomography image, we calculated the muscle thresholds. The software program calculated the HUESMcsa (indicated in blue). (A) Muscle atrophy: HUESMcsa 975.8 cm2. (B) Muscle hypertrophy: HUESMcsa 5,910.1 cm2. HU, Hounsfield unit; HUESMcsa, Hounsfield unit of average intensity value of erector spinae muscle in cross-sectional area in computed tomography.

  • Fig. 2 Flowchart of patient classification according to rehabilitation and propensity score matching.

  • Fig. 3 Correlation analysis of pulmonary function test parameters and the HUESMcsa: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) (A) and forced vital capacity (FVC) (B). HU, Hounsfieldunit; HUESMcsa, Hounsfieldunit of average intensity value of erector spinae muscle in cross-sectional area in computed tomography.


Reference

References

1. Mills JA, Marks E, Reynolds T, Cieza A. Rehabilitation: essential along the continuum of care. Jamison DT, Gel-band H, Horton S, Jha P, Laxminarayan R, Mock CN, editors. Disease control priorities: improving health and reducing poverty. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development;2017. p. 285–95.
Article
2. Colbenson GA, Johnson A, Wilson ME. Post-intensive care syndrome: impact, prevention, and management. Breathe (Sheff). 2019; 15:98–101.
Article
3. Lui SK, Nguyen MH. Elderly stroke rehabilitation: overcoming the complications and its associated challenges. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2018; 2018:9853837.
Article
4. Bellmann B, Lin T, Greissinger K, Rottner L, Rillig A, Zimmerling S. The beneficial effects of cardiac rehabilitation. Cardiol Ther. 2020; 9:35–44.
Article
5. Al Moamary MS, Alorainy H, Al-Hajjaj MS. Pulmonary rehabilitation: a regional perspective evidenced-based review. Ann Thorac Med. 2014; 9:3–7.
Article
6. Troosters T, Gayan-Ramirez G, Pitta F, Gosselin N, Gosselink R, Decramer M. Exercise effort training for COPD: physiological basis and results. Rev Mal Respir. 2004; 21:319–27.
7. Ryrso CK, Godtfredsen NS, Kofod LM, Lavesen M, Mogensen L, Tobberup R, et al. Lower mortality after early supervised pulmonary rehabilitation following COPD-exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pulm Med. 2018; 18:154.
Article
8. Dowman L, Hill CJ, Holland AE. Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (10):CD006322.
Article
9. Tiep B, Sun V, Koczywas M, Kim J, Raz D, Hurria A, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation and palliative care for the lung cancer patient. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2015; 17:462–8.
Article
10. Bradley A, Marshall A, Stonehewer L, Reaper L, Parker K, Bevan-Smith E, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation programme for patients undergoing curative lung cancer surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 44:e266–71.
Article
11. Vagvolgyi A, Rozgonyi Z, Kerti M, Agathou G, Vadasz P, Varga J. Effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation and correlations in between functional parameters, extent of thoracic surgery and severity of post-operative complications: randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10:3519–31.
Article
12. Pehlivan E, Balci A, Kilic L. Can functional inoperability in lung cancer patients be changed by pulmonary rehabilitation? Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2019; 27:212–8.
13. Arnold MT, Dolezal BA, Cooper CB. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: highly effective but often overlooked. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2020; 83:257–67.
Article
14. Bak SH, Kwon SO, Han SS, Kim WJ. Computed tomography-derived area and density of pectoralis muscle associated disease severity and longitudinal changes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a case control study. Respir Res. 2019; 20:226.
Article
15. Tanimura K, Sato S, Fuseya Y, Hasegawa K, Uemasu K, Sato A, et al. Quantitative assessment of erector spinae muscles in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: novel chest computed tomography-derived index for prognosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13:334–41.
Article
16. Sanders KJC, Degens J, Dingemans AC, Schols A. Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of muscle from regular chest computed tomography scans: L1 and pectoralis muscle compared to L3 as reference in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019; 14:781–9.
17. Aubrey J, Esfandiari N, Baracos VE, Buteau FA, Frenette J, Putman CT, et al. Measurement of skeletal muscle radiation attenuation and basis of its biological variation. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2014; 210:489–97.
Article
18. Ewaschuk JB, Almasud A, Mazurak VC. Role of n-3 fatty acids in muscle loss and myosteatosis. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014; 39:654–62.
Article
19. Hill K, Vogiatzis I, Burtin C. The importance of components of pulmonary rehabilitation, other than exercise training, in COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2013; 22:405–13.
Article
20. Wouters EF, Posthuma R, Koopman M, Liu WY, Sillen MJ, Hajian B, et al. An update on pulmonary rehabilitation techniques for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020; 14:149–61.
Article
21. Wilson JS, O’Neill B, Reilly J, MacMahon J, Bradley JM. Education in pulmonary rehabilitation: the patient’s perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88:1704–9.
Article
22. Aldhahir AM, Rajeh AM, Aldabayan YS, Drammeh S, Subbu V, Alqahtani JS, et al. Nutritional supplementation during pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a systematic review. Chron Respir Dis. 2020; 17:1479973120904953.
Article
23. Popa-Velea O, Purcarea VL. Psychological intervention: a critical element of rehabilitation in chronic pulmonary diseases. J Med Life. 2014; 7:274–81.
24. Rispoli M, Salvi R, Cennamo A, Di Natale D, Natale G, Meoli I, et al. Effectiveness of home-based preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients undergoing lung cancer resection. Tumori. 2020; 106:203–11.
Article
25. Moon SW, Choi JS, Lee SH, Jung KS, Jung JY, Kang YA, et al. Thoracic skeletal muscle quantification: low muscle mass is related with worse prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Respir Res. 2019; 20:35.
Article
26. Benzo R, Wigle D, Novotny P, Wetzstein M, Nichols F, Shen RK, et al. Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer resection: results from two randomized studies. Lung Cancer. 2011; 74:441–5.
Article
27. Choi MG, Lee HY, Song SY, Kim SS, Lee SH, Kim W, et al. The effects of simultaneous pulmonary rehabilitation during thoracic radiotherapy in the treatment of malignant diseases. Tuberc Respir Dis. 2021; 84:148–58.
Article
28. Ahn HJ, Jeon JY, Kim SS, Song SY, Kim W, Lee SW, et al. Feasibility of an outpatient-based pulmonary rehabilitation program for lung cancer patients during radiation therapy. Thorac Cancer. 2021; 12:2241–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr