Korean J Sports Med.  2022 Jun;40(2):102-109. 10.5763/kjsm.2022.40.2.102.

Complete versus Incomplete Footprint Coverage in Medium-Size Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears

Affiliations
  • 1210 Orthopedics, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
  • 3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
This study aims to verify the preoperative factor that can affect the footprint coverage during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in full-thickness medium-size cuff tear and the change of footprint coverage on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at postoperative 6 months.
Methods
A total of 30 medium-size full-thickness rotator cuff tears were analyzed. They were classified into complete footprint coverage group (CC, n=19) and incomplete footprint coverage group (IC, n=11) by arthroscopic findings and immediate postoperative MRI findings. MRI was performed before the operation, 1 day after the operation, and 6 months after the operation. Preoperative MRI evaluated the size of the anteroposterior tear width (cm), length of retraction (cm), fatty infiltration, and muscle atrophy. Postoperatively, footprint coverage, fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy were evaluated. We compared healing and change of fatty degeneration between two groups.
Results
The healing rate was significantly increased in the CC group (complete/partial healing, 10/9) compared to the IC group (complete/partial healing, 6/5) (p< 0.001). Six of 11 partial coverages (54.5%) were even improved to complete coverage at postoperative 6-month follow-up. However, the difference in footprint coverage did not affect the change of fatty degeneration at postoperative 6 months. Any change of fatty degeneration (FD) and initial FD of rotator cuff tendons were not correlated with healing (p< 0.05).
Conclusion
The footprint coverage can be changed in postoperative 6 months in MRI and anteroposterior tear size, retraction, fat degeneration, and muscle atrophy do not affect footprint coverage in medium-sized full-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Keyword

Muscular atrophy; Tear; Shoulder; Rotator cuff

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flow chart of the study. MRI: magnetic resonance imaging, FU: follow-up, POD: postoperative day.

  • Fig. 2 Schematic diagram. (A) Complete footprint coverage. (B) Incomplete footprint coverage. Arrowheads: ideal footprint area.


Reference

1. Cho NS, Yi JW, Rhee YG. 2009; Arthroscopic biceps augmentation for avoiding undue tension in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 25:183–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.012. PMID: 19171279.
Article
2. Constant CR, Murley AH. 1987; A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (214):160–4. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-198701000-00023. PMID: 3791738.
Article
3. Malkani AL, Sundine MJ, Tillett ED, Baker DL, Rogers RA, Morton TA. 2004; Transfer of the long head of the triceps tendon for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (428):228–36. DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000137559.97346.b2. PMID: 15534547.
Article
4. Holtby R, Razmjou H. 2014; Relationship between clinical and surgical findings and reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears: a longitudinal study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 15:180. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-180. PMID: 24884835. PMCID: PMC4039058.
Article
5. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. 1994; Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and post-operative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (304):78–83. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199407000-00014. PMID: 8020238.
6. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Gleyze P, Leguilloux P, Van Driessche S. 2003; Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 12:550–4. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(03)00211-8. PMID: 14671517.
Article
7. Mellado JM, Calmet J, Olona M, et al. 2005; Surgically repaired massive rotator cuff tears: MRI of tendon integrity, muscle fatty degeneration, and muscle atrophy correlated with intraoperative and clinical findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 184:1456–63. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.5.01841456. PMID: 15855096.
Article
8. Koh KH, Lim TK, Park YE, Lee SW, Park WH, Yoo JC. 2014; Preoperative factors affecting footprint coverage in rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 42:869–76. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513518581. PMID: 24496508.
Article
9. Tzanakakis N, Mouzopoulos G, Mataragas E, Yiannakopoulos C, Antonogiannakis E. 2011; 003 Grade of anatomic reconstruction of rotator cuff and functional outcome. Orthop Proc. 93-B(Suppl III):339.
10. Wu XL, Briggs L, Murrell GA. 2012; Intraoperative determinants of rotator cuff repair integrity: an analysis of 500 consecutive repairs. Am J Sports Med. 40:2771–6. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512462677. PMID: 23104609.
Article
11. Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Koh KH, Lim KS. 2009; Rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for large tears with less-than-optimal footprint coverage. Arthroscopy. 25:1093–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.07.010. PMID: 19801287.
Article
12. Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J. 2007; Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89:953–60. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00512. PMID: 17473131.
13. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C. 1999; Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 8:599–605. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90097-6. PMID: 10633896.
Article
14. Warner JJ, Higgins L, Parsons IM 4th, Dowdy P. 2001; Diagnosis and treatment of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 10:37–46. DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.112022. PMID: 11182734.
Article
15. Kim YS, Chung SW, Kim JY, Ok JH, Park I, Oh JH. 2012; Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Am J Sports Med. 40:815–21. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511434287. PMID: 22287641.
Article
16. Sugihara T, Nakagawa T, Tsuchiya M, Ishizuki M. 2003; Prediction of primary reparability of massive tears of the rotator cuff on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 12:222–5. DOI: 10.1016/S1058-2746(02)86888-4. PMID: 12851572.
Article
17. Burkhart SS. 1992; Fluoroscopic comparison of kinematic patterns in massive rotator cuff tears. A suspension bridge model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (284):144–52. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199211000-00018. PMID: 1395284.
18. Burkhart SS, Esch JC, Jolson RS. 1993; The rotator crescent and rotator cable: an anatomic description of the shoulder's "suspension bridge". Arthroscopy. 9:611–6. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80496-7. PMID: 20141989.
Article
19. Burkhart SS. 1994; Reconciling the paradox of rotator cuff repair versus debridement: a unified biomechanical rationale for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 10:4–19. DOI: 10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80288-9. PMID: 8166901.
Article
20. Dwyer T, Razmjou H, Henry P, Gosselin-Fournier S, Holtby R. 2015; Association between pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 23:415–22. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2745-z. PMID: 24170190.
Article
21. Porcellini G, Castagna A, Cesari E, Merolla G, Pellegrini A, Paladini P. 2011; Partial repair of irreparable supraspinatus tendon tears: clinical and radiographic evaluations at long-term follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 20:1170–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.002. PMID: 21277807.
Article
22. Snyder SJ. 1997; Technique of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using implantable 4-mm Revo suture anchors, suture Shuttle Relays, and no. 2 nonabsorbable mattress sutures. Orthop Clin North Am. 28:267–75. DOI: 10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70285-6. PMID: 9113721.
Article
23. Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM, et al. 2006; A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 88:2425–31. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00697. PMID: 17079400.
Article
24. Prasathaporn N, Kuptniratsaikul S, Kongrukgreatiyos K. 2011; Single-row repair versus double-row repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 27:978–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.01.014. PMID: 21693349.
Article
25. Zhang Q, Ge H, Zhou J, Yuan C, Chen K, Cheng B. 2013; Single-row or double-row fixation technique for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 8:e68515. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068515. PMID: 23874649. PMCID: PMC3708899.
Article
26. Xu C, Zhao J, Li D. 2014; Meta-analysis comparing single-row and double-row repair techniques in the arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 23:182–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.08.005. PMID: 24183478.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJSM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr