Prog Med Phys.  2022 Mar;33(1):1-10. 10.14316/pmp.2022.33.1.1.

Effective Volume of the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science Free Air Chamber L1 for Low-Energy X-Ray Measurement

Affiliations
  • 1Ionizing Radiation Metrology Group, Daejeon, Korea
  • 2Length Group, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Daejeon, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
To evaluate the effective volume of the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science free air chamber (KRISS FAC) L1 used for the primary standard device of the low-energy X-ray air kerma.
Methods
The mechanical dimensions were measured using a 3-dimensional coordinate mea suring machine (3-d CMM, Model UMM 500, Carl Zeiss). The diameter of the diaphragm was mea sured by a ring gauge calibrator (Model KRISS-DM1, KRISS). The elongation of the collector length due to electric field distortion was determined from the capacitance measurement of the KRISS FAC considering the result of the finite element method (FEM) analysis using the code QuickField v6.4.
Results
The measured length of the collector was 15.8003±0.0014 mm with a 68% confidence level (k=1). The aperture diameter of the diaphragm was 10.0021±0.0002 mm (k=1). The mechanical measurement volume of the KRISS FAC L1 was 1.2415±0.0006 cm 3 (k=1). The elongated length of the collector due to the electric field distortion was 0.170±0.021 mm. Considering the elongated length, the effective measurement volume of the KRISS FAC L1 was 1.2548±0.0019 cm3 (k=1).
Conclusions
The effective volume of the KRISS FAC L1 was determined from the mechanically measured value by adding the elongated volume due to the electric field distortion in the FAC. The effective volume will replace the existing mechanically determined volume in establishing and maintaining the primary standard of the low-energy X-ray.

Keyword

Primary standard; Air kerma; Low-energy X-ray; Free air chamber; Effective volume

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Cross-sectional view of the KRISS FAC L1 for low-energy X-ray measurement. The front wall was composed of 10-mm-thick stainless steel. The diaphragm was supported by a tungsten holder. Front view (a) and side view (b). Note that the units are given in mm and the figures are not to scale. KRISS FAC, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science free air chamber.

  • Fig. 2 Field line was drawn from the center of the air gap in the width of the collector electrode (a) and the field line drawn from the air gap in the length of the collector electrode (b). The X-ray beam axis is perpendicular to the figure plane (a), whereas the beam is incident from the left and exits right (b).

  • Fig. 3 Electric field line drawn along the height at the center of the air gap. The surface plane of the collector electrode was 0 mm-high, and the HV plate was 70 mm-high. The thin line indicates the air gap in the width of the collector, and the thick line indicates the air gap in the length of the collector. The ratio (∆w⁄∆l) in Eq. (6) was 2.06.

  • Fig. 4 Simulation geometry for calculating the energy deposition in the air slabs. An X-ray beam with a diameter of 10 mm was incident on the center of the front face of the air box. Fourteen air slabs with a thickness of 5-mm were piled from the bottom to the top of the air box and the energy deposited portion in each slab was calculated.

  • Fig. 5 Ratio of Ai, the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the paired 5-mm-thick slices in the elongated volume to A0 (=0.85 mm2) that of the cross-sectional areas of the paired 5-mm-thick slabs with the same length equal to the peak elongation of 0.085 mm. KRISS FAC, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science free air chamber.

  • Fig. 6 Cross-sectional view of the collection volume, the elongated volume, and the effective collection volume.


Reference

References

1. International Standardization Organization (ISO). 2019. ISO Reference no. 4037-1. Radiological protection- X and gamma reference radiation for calibrating dosemeters and doserate meters and for determining their response as a function of photon energy. Part 1: Radiation characteristics and production methods. ISO;Geneva:
2. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). 2005. IEC Reference no. 61267. Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment. Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. IEC;Geneva:
3. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). 2014. ICRU Report 90. Key data for ionizing. Radiation dosimetry: measurement standards and applications. ICRU;Geneva:
4. Kim JA, Kim JW, Kang CS, Eom TB. 2010; An interferometric Abbe-type comparator for the calibration of internal and external diameter standards. Meas Sci Technol. 21:075109. DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/21/7/075109.
Article
5. Korea Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS). 2012. KRISS calibration procedure no. C-01-1-0100-2000-1. Calibration procedure of cylindrical diameter standards using a laser interferometric comparator. KRISS;Daejeon:
6. Korea Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS). 2005. KRISS calibration procedure no. C-26-1-1000-01. Calibration procedure of electrometers. KRISS;Daejeon:
7. Lee RD, Kim HJ. Semenov YuP. 2001; New stable 10 pF gas-dielectric capacitors. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 50:294–297. DOI: 10.1109/19.918125.
Article
8. Yi CY, Kim YH, Kim IJ. 2021; Temperataure dependence of effective area and depth of extrapolation chamber in dosimetry. Metrologia. 58:065001. DOI: 10.1088/1681-7575/ac2295.
9. Kawrakow I, Mainegra-Hing E, Rogers DWO, Tessier F, Walters BRB. 2015. NRCC Report PIRS-701. The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. National Republican Congressional Committee;Washington, D.C.:
10. Lye JE, Butler DJ, Webb DV. 2010; Monte Carlo correction factors for the ARPANSA kilovoltage free-air chambers and the effect of moving the limiting aperture. Metrologia. 47:11–20. DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/47/1/002.
Article
11. Kurosawa T, Takata N. 2005; Estimation of electron-loss and photon-scattering corrections for parallel-plate free-air chambers. J Nucl Sci Technol. 42:1077–1080. DOI: 10.1080/18811248.2005.9711060.
Article
12. Burns DT, Kessler C, Allisy PJ. 2009; Re-evaluation of the BIPM international standards for air kerma in x-rays. Metrologia. 46:L21–L23. DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/46/5/N01.
Article
Full Text Links
  • PMP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr