Anat Cell Biol.  2022 Mar;55(1):48-54. 10.5115/acb.21.223.

Evaluating the effectiveness of gluteal intramuscular injection sites: a cadaveric study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anatomy, Catholic Institute for Applied Anatomy and College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Anatomy, College of Korean Medicine, Dongshin University, Naju, Korea
  • 3Department of Nursing, College of Nursing, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea

Abstract

The gluteal region is a frequent target for injecting high volumes. However, the safe intramuscular injection sites have been controversy in this region. This study was aimed to compare the subcutaneous fat and muscle thicknesses at the two gluteal injection sites and to determine the influence of sex and body mass index (BMI) on fat and muscle thicknesses. The ultimate purpose of this study is to suggest the most suitable intramuscular injection site among the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal regions. Eleven fresh cadavers were injected with colored gelatin using syringes at the two gluteal injection sites. Seven variables were measured at both gluteal injection sites and analyzed relative to sex and the BMI. No variables showed statistically significant differences between the two gluteal injection sites according to sex. In a one-way analysis of variance, total length and muscle thickness had significant difference according to the BMI category. In obese cadavers, the injected gelatin core was located in the subcutaneous layer (average 109.0 percentile), and in the muscle layer (average 78.9 percentile) in the dorsogluteal region. These were found that the success rate of injection in the dorsogluteal region was higher than in the ventrogluteal region, especially when classed as obese. Also, it is suggested that nurses should use the traditional intramuscular injection method. It will also be necessary to consider expanding these findings to other ethnic groups in the Asia–Pacific region and then also education in universities and health providers on selecting the intramuscular gluteal injection site.

Keyword

Intramuscular injections; Body mass index; Dorsogluteal; Ventrogluteal

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Transverse section of red latex-injected cadaveric pelvis from inferior view. Note the blue colored gelatin was injected by dorsogluteal site and the green colored gelatin by ventrogluteal site. GMa, gluteus maximus; GMe, gluteus medius; GMi, gluteus minimus; H, hip bone; S, sacrum.


Reference

References

1. Elgellaie A, Ashcroft E, Larkin TA. 2018; Effects of thickness of muscle and subcutaneous fat on efficacy of gluteal intramuscular injection sites. Br J Nurs. 27:300–5. DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.6.300. PMID: 29561673.
Article
2. Hopkins U, Arias CY. 2013; Large-volume IM injections: a review of best practices. Oncol Nurse Advis. 4:32–7.
3. Nakajima Y, Fujii T, Mukai K, Ishida A, Kato M, Takahashi M, Tsuda M, Hashiba N, Mori N, Yamanaka A, Ozaki N, Nakatani T. 2020; Anatomically safe sites for intramuscular injections: a cross-sectional study on young adults and cadavers with a focus on the thigh. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 16:189–96. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1646576. PMID: 31403356. PMCID: PMC7012163.
Article
4. Nicoll LH, Hesby A. 2002; Intramuscular injection: an integrative research review and guideline for evidence-based practice. Appl Nurs Res. 15:149–62. DOI: 10.1053/apnr.2002.34142. PMID: 12173166.
Article
5. 2015. WHO calls for worldwide use of "smart" syringes [Internet]. World Health Organization;Geneva: Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/23-02-2015-who-calls-for-worldwide-use-of-smart-syringes. cited 2021 Oct 20.
6. Zelman S. 1961; Notes on techniques of intramuscular injection. The avoidance of needless pain and morbidity. Am J Med Sci. 241:563–74. DOI: 10.1097/00000441-196105000-00002. PMID: 13788180.
Article
7. Barry JM, Harsh V, Patil S. 2014; Are our intramuscular injections nerve-friendly? What are we missing? Simple techniques to prevent, recognize and manage nerve injection injuries. Int J Stud Res. 4:25–8. DOI: 10.4103/2230-7095.149755.
Article
8. Larkin TA, Ashcroft E, Elgellaie A, Hickey BA. 2017; Ventrogluteal versus dorsogluteal site selection: a cross-sectional study of muscle and subcutaneous fat thicknesses and an algorithm incorporating demographic and anthropometric data to predict injection outcome. Int J Nurs Stud. 71:1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.017. PMID: 28273627.
Article
9. Larkin TA, Ashcroft E, Hickey BA, Elgellaie A. 2018; Influence of gender, BMI and body shape on theoretical injection outcome at the ventrogluteal and dorsogluteal sites. J Clin Nurs. 27:e242–50. DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13923. PMID: 28618093.
Article
10. Mishra P, Stringer MD. 2010; Sciatic nerve injury from intramuscular injection: a persistent and global problem. Int J Clin Pract. 64:1573–9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02177.x. PMID: 20670272.
Article
11. Zaybak A, Güneş UY, Tamsel S, Khorshid L, Eşer I. 2007; Does obesity prevent the needle from reaching muscle in intramuscular injections? J Adv Nurs. 58:552–6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04264.x. PMID: 17484745.
Article
12. Heo M, Faith MS, Pietrobelli A, Heymsfield SB. 2012; Percentage of body fat cutoffs by sex, age, and race-ethnicity in the US adult population from NHANES 1999-2004. Am J Clin Nutr. 95:594–602. DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.025171. PMID: 22301924.
Article
13. Holliday RM, Gupta V, Vibhute PG. 2019; Body mass index: a reliable predictor of subcutaneous fat thickness and needle length for ventral gluteal intramuscular injections. Am J Ther. 26:e72–8. DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000474. PMID: 27574934.
Article
14. Jensen B, Moritoyo T, Kaufer-Horwitz M, Peine S, Norman K, Maisch MJ, Matsumoto A, Masui Y, Velázquez-González A, Domínguez-García J, Fonz-Enríquez E, Salgado-Moctezuma SG, Bosy-Westphal A. 2019; Ethnic differences in fat and muscle mass and their implication for interpretation of bioelectrical impedance vector analysis. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 44:619–26. DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0276. PMID: 30354265.
Article
15. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR. Moore KL, Dalley AF, Agur AMR, editors. 2014. Lower limb. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer;Philadelphia: p. 721–35.
16. Greenway K. 2004; Using the ventrologluteal site for intramuscular injection. Nurs Stand. 18:39–42. DOI: 10.7748/ns2004.03.18.25.39.c3560. PMID: 15038176.
17. Burbridge BE. 2007; Computed tomographic measurement of gluteal subcutaneous fat thickness in reference to failure of gluteal intramuscular injections. Can Assoc Radiol J. 58:72–5.
18. Lim JU, Lee JH, Kim JS, Hwang YI, Kim TH, Lim SY, Yoo KH, Jung KS, Kim YK, Rhee CK. 2017; Comparison of World Health Organization and Asia-Pacific body mass index classifications in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 12:2465–75. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S141295. PMID: 28860741. PMCID: PMC5571887.
Article
19. Seo MH, Lee WY, Kim SS, Kang JH, Kang JH, Kim KK, Kim BY, Kim YH, Kim WJ, Kim EM, Kim HS, Shin YA, Shin HJ, Lee KR, Lee KY, Lee SY, Lee SK, Lee JH, Lee CB, Chung S, Cho YH, Choi KM, Han JS, Yoo SJ. 2019; 2018 Korean Society for the study of obesity guideline for the management of obesity in Korea. J Obes Metab Syndr. 28:40–5. DOI: 10.7570/jomes.2019.28.1.40. PMID: 31089578. PMCID: PMC6484940.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ACB
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr