Asian Spine J.  2022 Feb;16(1):119-126. 10.31616/asj.2020.0109.

Influence of Tensioner’s Mobilization on the Centralization of Symptoms in Cervicobrachial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Physiotherapy, Mother Teresa Saket College of Physiotherapy, Chandimandir, India
  • 1Department of Physiotherapy, Mother Teresa Saket College of Physiotherapy, Chandimandir, India
  • 2Department of Physiotherapy, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
  • 2Department of Physiotherapy, Jamia Hamdard, New Delhi, India
  • 3Department of Physiotherapy, Abhinav Bindra Targeting Performance, Mohali, India
  • 3Department of Physiotherapy, Abhinav Bindra Targeting Performance, Mohali, India
  • 4Department of Physiotherapy, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre-Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, New Delhi, India
  • 4Department of Physiotherapy, Indian Spinal Injuries Centre-Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Study Design: This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Purpose: The present study aimed to determine the impact of neural mobilization by tensioner’s technique (NMTT) on the centralization of symptoms and pain in patients with cervicobrachial pain syndrome (CBPS). Overview of Literature: CBPS is a disabling condition of the neck that is characterized by pain and paresthesia in the upper quarter. Several techniques have successfully provided immediate and long-term relief in CBPS; however, few studies have evaluated the effect of these techniques on the centralization of symptoms.
Methods
Thirty patients aged 18–45 years with a complaint of pain in the neck that had persisted for 2–12 weeks radiating to the arm and fulfilling Elvey’s criteria were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Group A received NMTT plus conventional treatment (hot pack and postural advice with cervical lateral glide), and group B received only conventional treatment 3 times a week for 2 weeks. The outcome measures were Wernicke’s scale score for the centralization of symptoms and Visual Analog Scale score for pain intensity. Within- and between-group comparisons were made before initiating treatment and at the end of the 3rd and 6th sessions. Within group analyses for the centralization values were performed using Friedmann test, and between-group analyses were performed using Mann-Whitney test. A 2×3 mixed model of the analysis of variance was used for analyzing the pain levels.
Results
There was a significant difference (p<0.05) within and between the groups for both the measures at the end of the 3rd and 6th sessions. Thus, NMTT may be beneficial in decreasing the peripheralization of symptoms and pain intensity in patients with CBPS.
Conclusions
NMTT can be used as an alternative and effective treatment option for patients with CBPS.

Keyword

Cervico-brachial neuralgia; Cervico-brachial neuralgia; Radiating pain; Radiating pain; Neural mobilization; Neural mobilization
Full Text Links
  • ASJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr