Korean Circ J.  2022 Feb;52(2):147-149. 10.4070/kcj.2021.0386.

We Always Have a Choice: Pericardial Versus Porcine Valves for Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

• Chee HK

• KMID: 2525454
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2021.0386

Abstract

no abstract available.

Reference

1. Statistics Korea. Korean Statistical Information Services [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2021. cited 2021 November 22. Available from: https://kosis.kr.

2. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006; 368:1005–1011. PMID: 16980116.

3. Capodanno D, Petronio AS, Prendergast B, et al. Standardized definitions of structural deterioration and valve failure in assessing long-term durability of transcatheter and surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves: a consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2017; 38:3382–3390. PMID: 29020344.

4. Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017; 38:2739–2791. PMID: 28886619.

5. Du DT, Lu X, McKean S, et al. Selection of prosthetic aortic valves in the United States among elderly Medicare patients from 2006 to 2015. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 159:62–69.

6. Bourguignon T, Lhommet P, El Khoury R, et al. Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve in patients aged 50–65 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49:1462–1468. PMID: 26530269.

7. Hickey GL, Bridgewater B, Grant SW, et al. National registry data and record linkage to inform postmarket surveillance of prosthetic aortic valve models over 15 years. JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177:79–86. PMID: 27820610.

8. Yap KH, Murphy R, Devbhandari M, Venkateswaran R. Aortic valve replacement: is porcine or bovine valve better? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013; 16:361–373. PMID: 23211215.

9. Shin HJ, Kim WK, Kim JK, et al. Pericardial versus porcine valves for surgical aortic valve replacement. Korean Circ J. 2022; 52:136–146.

10. Lehmann S, Jawad K, Dieterlen MT, et al. Durability and clinical experience using a bovine pericardial prosthetic aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 161:1742–1749. PMID: 31932059.