Kosin Med J.  2021 Dec;36(2):100-108. 10.7180/kmj.2021.36.2.100.

Effects of Changes in Inspiratory Time on Inspiratory Flowrate and Airway Pressure during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Manikin-Based Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea
  • 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju-si, Republic of Korea

Abstract


Objectives
Given that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an aerosol-generating procedure, it is necessary to use a mechanical ventilator and reduce the number of providers involved in resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients or suspected COVID-19 patients. However, no study assessed the effect of changes in inspiratory time on flowrate and airway pressure during CPR. We herein aimed to determine changes in these parameters during CPR and identify appropriate ventilator management for adults during CPR.
Methods
We measured changes in tidal volume (Vt), peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR), peak airway pressure (Ppeak), mean airway pressure (Pmean) according to changes in inspiratory time (0.75 s, 1.0 s and 1.5 s) with or without CPR. Vt of 500 mL was supplied (flowrate: 10 times/min) using a mechanical ventilator. Chest compressions were maintained at constant compression depth (53 ± 2 mm) and speed (102 ± 2/min) using a mechanical chest compression device.
Results
Median levels of respiratory physiological parameters during CPR were significantly different according to the inspiratory time (0.75 s vs. 1.5 s): PIFR (80.8 [73.3 – 87.325] vs. 70.5 [67 – 72.4] L/min, P < 0.001), Ppeak (54 [48 – 59] vs. 47 [45 – 49] cmH2O, P < 0.001), and Pmean (3.9 [3.6 – 4.1] vs. 5.7 [5.6 – 5.8] cmH2O, P < 0.001).
Conclusions
Changes in PIFR, Ppeak, and Pmean were associated with inspiratory time. PIFR and Ppeak values tended to decrease with increase in inspiratory time, while Pmean showed a contrasting trend. Increased inspiratory time in low-compliance cardiac arrest patients will help in reducing lung injury during adult CPR.

Keyword

Airway pressure; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Inspiratory time; Mechanical ventilator

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Manikin model: CPR manikin with airway circuit connected to the flow analyzer. A mechanical chest compression device is installed in the manikin.

  • Fig. 2 Changes of the flow rate (A), peak airway pressure (B), and mean airway pressure (C) according to each inspiratory times (0.75 s, 1.0 s and 1.5 s). Bonferroni correction for multiplicity, P < 0.05/3.


Reference

1. Hunter DJ. Covid-19 and the stiff upper lip—the pandemic response in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:e31.
2. Rosenbaum L. Facing Covid-19 in Italy—ethics, logistics, and therapeutics on the epidemic’s front line. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382:1873–5.
3. DeFilippis EM, Ranard LS, Berg DD. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a view from trainees on the front line. Circulation. 2020; 141:1833–5.
4. Edelson DP, Sasson C, Chan PS, Atkins DL, Aziz K, Becker LB, et al. Interim guidance for basic and advanced life support in adults, children, and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 from the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get with the Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020; 141:e933–e943.
Article
5. Soar J, Callaway CW, Aibiki M, Böttiger BW, Brooks SC, Deakin CD, et al. Part 4: Advanced life support: 2015 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. 2015; 95:e71–120.
6. Ornato JP, Bryson BL, Donovan PJ, Farquharson RR, Jaeger C. Measurement of ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 1983; 11:79–82.
Article
7. Kim JW, Lee JW, Ryu S, Park JS, Yoo IS, Cho YC, et al. Changes in peak inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure with endotracheal tube size during chest compression. World J Emerg Med. 2020; 11:97–101.
Article
8. McInnes AD, Sutton RM, Orioles A, Nishisaki A, Niles D, Abella BS, et al. The first quantitative report of ventilation rate during in-hospital resuscitation of older children and adolescents. Resuscitation. 2011; 82:1025–9.
Article
9. Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a common and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32:S345–51.
Article
10. Park SO, Shin DH, Baek KJ, Hong DY, Kim EJ, Kim SC, et al. A clinical observational study analyzing the factors associated with hyperventilation during actual cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the emergency department. Resuscitation. 2013; 84:298–303.
11. Halperin HR, Lee K, Zviman M, Illindala U, Lardo A, Kolandaivelu A, et al. Outcomes from low versus high-flow cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a swine model of cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28:195–202.
Article
12. Reynolds JC, Salcido DD, Menegazzi JJ. Coronary perfusion pressure and return of spontaneous circulation after prolonged cardiac arrest. Pre Hos Emerg Care. 2010; 14:78–84.
Article
13. Kern KB, Stickney RE, Gallison L, Smith RE. Metronome improves compression and ventilation rates during CPD on a manikin in a randomized trial. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:206–10.
14. Abella BS, Edelson DP, Kim S, Retzer E, Myklebust H, Barry AM, et al. CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation. 2007; 73:54–61.
Article
15. Edelson DP, Litzinger B, Arora V, Walsh D, Kim S, Lauderdale DS, et al. Improving inhospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168:1063–9.
Article
16. Edelson DP, Eilevstjønn J, Weidman EK, Retzer E, Hoek TL, Abella BS. Capnography and chest-wall impedance algorithms for ventilation detection during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2010; 81:317–22.
Article
17. Maertens VL, De Smedt LE, Lemoyne S, Huybrechts SA, Wouters K, Kalmar AF, et al. Patients with cardiac arrest are ventilated two times faster than guidelines recommend: an observational prehospital study using tracheal pressure measurement. Resuscitation. 2013; 84:921–6.
Article
18. O’Neill JF, Deakin CD. Do we hyperventilate cardiac arrest patients? Resuscitation. 2007; 73:82–5.
Article
19. Yannopoulos D, Aufderheide TP, Gabrielli A, Beiser DG, McKnite SH, Pirrallo RG, et al. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of 15:2 and 30:2 compression-to-ventilation ratios for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2006; 34:1444–9.
Article
20. Yannopoulos D, Sigurdsson G, McKnite S, Benditt D, Lurie KG. Reducing ventilation frequency combined with an inspiratory impedance device improves CPR efficiency in swine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2004; 61:75–82.
Article
21. Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, Yannopoulos D, McKnite S, von Briesen C, et al. Hyperventilation-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Circulation. 2004; 109:1960–5.
Article
22. Yannopoulos D, Tang W, Roussos C, Aufderheide TP, Idris AH, Lurie KG. Reducing ventilation frequency during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Respir Care. 2005; 50:628–35.
23. Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a common and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32:S345–51.
Article
24. Needham DM, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Dinglas VD, Sevransky JE, Dennison Himmelfarb CR, et al. Lung protective mechanical ventilation and two-year survival in patients with acute lung injury: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2012; 344:e2124.
25. Kolobow T, Moretti MP, Fumagalli R, Mascheroni D, Prato P, Chen V, et al. Severe impairment in lung function induced by high peak airway pressure during mechanical ventilation: an experimental study. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987; 135:312–5.
26. Weiss SJ, Ernst AA, Jones R, Ong M, Filbrun T, Augustin C, et al. Automatic transport ventilator versus bag valve in the EMS setting: a prospective, randomized trial. South Med J. 2005; 98:970–6.
Article
27. Salas N, Wisor B, Agazio J, Branson R, Austin PN. Comparison of ventilation and cardiac compressions using the impact Model 730 automatic transport ventilator compared to a conventional bag valve with a facemask in a model of adult cardiopulmonary arrest. Resuscitation. 2007; 74:94–101.
Article
28. Ahn HJ, Kim KD, Jeong WJ, Lee JW, Yoo IS, Ryu S. The adequacy of a conventional mechanical ventilator as a ventilation method during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a manikin study. Korean J Crit Care Med. 2015; 30:89–94.
Article
29. Lee SM, Kim WH, Ahn HJ, Kim JA, Yang MK, Lee CH, et al. The effects of prolonged inspiratory time during one-lung ventilation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia. 2013; 68:908–16.
30. Wright PE, Marini JJ, Bernard GR. In vitro versus in vivo comparison of endotracheal tube airflow resistance. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989; 140:10–6.
Full Text Links
  • KMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr