Pediatr Emerg Med J.  2021 Dec;8(2):73-80. 10.22470/pemj.2021.00318.

Potential benefit of a screening tool in selecting head-injured children aged 36 months or younger who can cooperate in computed tomography

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
We aimed to investigate the benefit of a screening tool in selecting head-injured children who can potentially cooperate with computed tomography (CT).
Methods
The study population consisted of head-injured children aged 36 months or younger who visited the emergency department (ED) and underwent CT from January 2013 through December 2020. Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) using per os chloral hydrate or per rectal thiopental was implemented to children presumed less cooperative for CT as per a clinical screening tool for cooperative candidates for CT (e.g., ability to lie still on bed for 10 seconds without a guardian). According to the PSA and the first attempt success of CT, we compared baseline characteristics, CT findings, clinically important traumatic brain injury, ED length of stay (EDLOS), and ED disposition.
Results
Among the 247 children, PSA was used in 102 (41.3%). The PSA group showed a higher proportion of 3-36 months of age (PSA, 96.1% vs. non-PSA, 82.8%; P = 0.001) and longer median EDLOS (PSA, 127.0 [interquartile range, 101.0-172.0] vs. non-PSA, 85.0 minutes [63.0-130.0]; P < 0.001). The number of children undergoing the first attempt success was 213 (86.2%) without a difference in both groups (PSA, 84.3% vs. non-PSA, 87.6%; P = 0.645). In the 213 children, the implementation of PSA was associated with longer median EDLOS (PSA, 121.0 [99.0-156.0] vs. non-PSA, 77.0 minutes [60.0-122.0]; P < 0.001). In the non-PSA group (n = 145), the first attempt failure was associated with the presence of skull fracture (success, 7.1% vs. failure, 27.8%; P = 0.009).
Conclusion
This study suggests a potential benefit of the screening tool in selecting cooperative candidates for CT, i.e., those who could forgo PSA using oral chloral hydrate or per rectal thiopental, in young children with head injury.

Keyword

Child; Conscious Sedation; Craniocerebral Trauma; Deep Sedation; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Length of Stay; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Pain, Procedural; Skull Fractures

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flow chart. *See the definitions in the methods section. CT: computed tomography, PSA: procedural sedation and analgesia.


Reference

References

1. Jang HY, Jung JH, Kyong YY, Kim KH, Kim DK, Kim MR, et al. Korean guidelines for pediatric procedural sedation and analgesia. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2012; 23(3):303–14. Korean.
2. Park CS. The current state of sedation outside the operating room. J Korean Med Assoc. 2013; 56:264–70. Korean.
Article
3. Burger RK, Figueroa J, McCracken C, Mallory MD, Kamat PP. Sedatives used in children to obtain head CT in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2021; 44:198–202.
Article
4. Sacchetti A, Carraccio C, Giardino A, Harris RH. Sedation for pediatric CT scanning: is radiology becoming a drug-free zone? Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005; 21:295–7.
5. Dong SZ, Zhu M, Bulas D. Techniques for minimizing sedation in pediatric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019; 50:1047–54.
Article
6. Barkovich MJ, Xu D, Desikan RS, Williams C, Barkovich AJ. Pediatric neuro MRI: tricks to minimize sedation. Pediatr Radiol. 2018; 48:50–5.
Article
7. Zhu Y, Li Z, Ma J, Hong Y, Pi Z, Qu X, et al. Imaging the infant chest without sedation: feasibility of using single axial rotation with 16-cm wide-detector CT. Radiology. 2018; 286:279–85.
Article
8. Kaste SC, Young CW, Holmes TP, Baker DK. Effect of helical CT on the frequency of sedation in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168:1001–3.
Article
9. Young JY, Duhaime AC, Caruso PA, Rincon SP. Comparison of non-sedated brain MRI and CT for the detection of acute traumatic injury in children 6 years of age or less. Emerg Radiol. 2016; 23:325–31.
10. Coté CJ, Wilson S. Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients before, during, and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: update 2016. Pediatr Dent. 2016; 38:13–39.
Article
11. Kaufman RA. Technical aspects of abdominal CT in infants and children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 153:549–54.
Article
12. Jung SW, Jang JH, Cho JS, Hyun SY, Lim YS, Yang HJ, et al. The effect of introducing Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network rule on reducing brain computed tomography use for children with minor head injury. Pediatr Emerg Med J. 2019; 6:63–8. Korean.
13. Jung KY, Han SB, Lee JS, Kim JJ, Suh YJ, Kim JH. Availability of the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) rule for computed tomography scanning decision in children younger than 2 years with minor head injury. Pediatr Emerg Med J. 2015; 2:67–74. Korean.
Article
14. Bae JA, Choi YH, Kim AJ, Lee SH. Administration and efficiency comparison of chloral hydrate during pediatric sedation. J Korean Soc Clin Toxicol. 2016; 14:9–15.
15. Joharji NM. The effectiveness of nitrous oxide sedation combined with behavior management in a private dental practice in Saudi Arabia. IPDOAJ. 2020; 4:315–23.
Article
16. Lim T, Park J, Je S. Pediatric Korean triage and acuity scale. Pediatr Emerg Med J. 2015; 2:53–8. Korean.
Article
17. Lee KJ, Park MH, Suh J, Jung SY, Lee SJ, Cha M. Triage results of children who visited the emergency department via emergency medical service providers: an observational study in a regional emergency medical center. Pediatr Emerg Med J. 2017; 4:18–24. Korean.
Article
18. Nilsson S, Finnström B, Kokinsky E. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008; 18:767–74.
19. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, Hoyle JD Jr, Atabaki SM, Holubkov R, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009; 374:1160–70.
20. Kim DK. Procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Med J. 2018; 5:31–7. Korean.
Article
21. Lawrence LM, Wright SW. Sedation of pediatric patients for minor laceration repair: effect on length of emergency department stay and patient charges. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1998; 14:393–5.
Article
22. Kim M, Yoon K, Kim M, Mun J, Bum H. A study on the usefulness of method using wide volume axial scan and assist device without sedation in pediatric brain CT. J Korean Soc Comput Tomogr Technol. 2018; 20:11–22. Korean.
Article
23. Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ. Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol. 2011; 41:1353–64.
Article
24. Conforto A, Claudius I. Head injury in infants and children. In : Cline D, Ma OJ, Meckler GD, Stapczynski JS, Tintinalli JE, Yealy DM, editors. Tintinalli’s emergency medicine: a comprehensive study guide. 8th ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill Education;2016. p. 903–10.
Full Text Links
  • PEMJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr