J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2022 Jan;65(1):138-144. 10.3340/jkns.2020.0360.

Type 1.5 Split Cord Malformation : A New Theory of Pathogenesis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
  • 2Medical School, Nankai University, Tianjin, China
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, Yuquan Hospital, Beijing, China

Abstract

To report two cases of type 1.5 split cord malformation (SCM), a subtype of SCM with combined characteristics of types I and II and to review the relevant literature and propose a new possible pathogenetic theory for type 1.5 SCM. A 52-year-old woman had hemicords within a single dural sac with a dorsal bony septum at the L5 level. A 9-year-old boy had hemicords within a single dural sac with a ventral bony septum and fibrous extension at the L3 level. Both patients underwent microsurgical treatments for removing the bony septum, detethering the spinal cord, and sectioning the filum terminale. The surgical procedure revealed an extradural partial bony septum and hemicords within an intact single dural sac in each patient. Both patients were discharged from the hospital without de novo nerve dysfunction. Published cases have validated that types I and II SCM can overlap. We recommend recent type 1.5 SCM as a normative terminology for this overlapping SCM and report two rare cases of this SCM. We propose an associated pathogenesis consisting of uneven distribution and regression to explain type 1.5 SCM. Furthermore, we postulate that the amount of condensing meninx primitiva might determine whether the left bony septum has fibrous extensions to the opposite dura in type 1.5 SCM.

Keyword

Split cord malformation; Pathogenesis; Embryogenesis; Meninx; Regression

Figure

  • Fig. 1. The lumbosacral dermal sinus (about 4×4 cm) with central hyperpigmentation (A). Magnetic resonance imaging suggesting a dorsal bulging lesion (arrowhead) at the L5 level and a low conus at the S1 level (B : axial T1-weighted sequences; C : sagittal T1-weighted sequences; D : sagittal T2-weighted sequences).

  • Fig. 2. Computed tomography suggesting a dorsal bony septum (asterisk) at the L5 level (A : sagittal view; B : coronal view; C : axial view). A partially resected dorsal bony septum (asterisk) found intraoperatively. Its base was sectioned during the primary laminectomy (D).

  • Fig. 3. Magnetic resonance imaging suggesting a ventral spinous lesion (arrow) at the L3 level and a low conus at the L5 level (A : sagittal T1-weighted sequences; B : sagittal T2-weighted sequences; C: axial T2-weighted sequences). Split spinal cord (D).

  • Fig. 4. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrating a ventral bony septum (dotted arrow) at the L3 level (A : sagittal view; B : axial soft-tissue window; C : axial bone window). Three-dimensional CT reconstruction indicating lumbosacral spina bifida (D).

  • Fig. 5. A : An intact single dural sac. B : A fibrous extension to the dorsal dura (pound). C : A ventral bony septum (cross). D : Complete resection of the bony septum.

  • Fig. 6. A relatively lower proportion of meninx primitiva near the neural arch regressing into a fibrous extension from the ventral bony septum in case 2 (A). Few meninx primitiva cells existing around the vertebral body, resulting in a regressed dorsal bony septum without any ventral fibrous extension in case 1 (B).


Reference

References

1. Akay KM, Izci Y, Baysefer A. Dorsal bony septum: a split cord malformation variant. Pediatr Neurosurg. 36:225–228. 2002.
Article
2. Akay KM, Izci Y, Baysefer A, Timurkaynak E. Composite type of split cord malformation: two different types at three different levels: case report. J Neurosurg. 102(4 Suppl):436–438. 2005.
Article
3. Basak M, Ozel A, Erturk M. An unusual case of diastematomyelia. Presence of one dural sheath associated with a bony spur. Acta Radiol. 43:626. 2002.
Article
4. Bruce A, M’Donald S, Pirie JHH. A second case of partial doubling of the spinal cord. Rev Neurol Psychiatr. 4:6. 1906.
5. Chandra PS, Kamal R, Mahapatra AK. An unusual case of dorsally situated bony spur in a lumbar split cord malformation. Pediatr Neurosurg. 31:49–52. 1999.
Article
6. Colas JF, Schoenwolf GC. Towards a cellular and molecular understanding of neurulation. Dev Dyn. 221:117–145. 2001.
Article
7. Erşahin Y. An unusual split cord malformation. Pediatr Neurosurg. 32:109. 2000.
Article
8. Garg K, Mahapatra AK, Tandon V. A rare case of type 1 C split cord malformation with single dural sheath. Asian J Neurosurg. 10:226–228. 2015.
Article
9. Herren RY, Edwards JE. Diplomyelia (duplication of the spinal cord). Arch Pathol. 30:1203–1213. 1940.
10. Hertwig O. Urmund und spina bifida. Archiv f mikrosk Anatomie. 39:353–502. 1892.
Article
11. Izci Y, Kural C. Composite type of split cord malformation: rare and difficult to explain. Pediatr Neurosurg. 47:461. 2011.
Article
12. Lichtenstein BW. Spinal dysraphism: spina bifida and myelodysplasia. Arch Neur Psych. 44:792–810. 1940.
13. Marr GE, Uihlein A. Diplomyelia and compression of the spinal cord and not of the cauda equina, by a congenital anomaly of the third lumbar vertebra. Surg Clin North Am. 24:963–977. 1944.
14. Maxwell HP, Bucy PC. Diastematomyelia; report of a clinical case. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 5:165–167. 1946.
Article
15. Meena RK, Doddamani RS, Gurjar HK, Kumar A, Chandra PS. Type 1.5 split cord malformations: an uncommon entity. World Neurosurg. 133:142–149. 2020.
Article
16. Pang D, Dias MS, Ahab-Barmada M. Split cord malformation: part I: a unified theory of embryogenesis for double spinal cord malformations. Neurosurgery. 31:451–480. 1992.
17. Pickles W. Duplication of the spinal cord; an account of a clinical example with a consideration of other reports. J Neurosurg. 6:324–331. 1949.
18. Salunke P, Kovai P, Malik V, Sharma M. Mixed split cord malformation: are we missing something? Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 113:774–778. 2011.
Article
19. Singh PK, Khandelwal A, Singh A, Ailawadhi P, Gupta D, Mahapatra AK. Long-segment type 1 split cord malformation with two-level split cord malformation and a single dural sac at the lower split. Pediatr Neurosurg. 47:227–229. 2011.
Article
20. Vaishya S, Kumarjain P. Split cord malformation: three unusual cases of composite split cord malformation. Childs Nerv Syst. 17:528–530. 2001.
Article
21. Van Aalst J, Beuls EA, Vles JS, Cornips EM, van Straaten HW. The intermediate type split cord malformation: hypothesis and case report. Childs Nerv Syst. 21:1020–1024. 2005.
Article
22. Xu X, Li C, Takahashi K, Slavkin HC, Shum L, Deng CX. Murine fibroblast growth factor receptor 1alpha isoforms mediate node regression and are essential for posterior mesoderm development. Dev Biol. 208:293–306. 1999.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr