Int Neurourol J.  2021 Dec;25(4):319-326. 10.5213/inj.2040364.182.

Long-term Outcomes of Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions

Affiliations
  • 1Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
  • 2Departamento de Cirugía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
  • 3Servicio de Cirugía, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain
  • 4Departamento de Psicología Clínica, Psicobiología y Metodología, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

Abstract

Purpose
The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) in both idiopathic and neurogenic pelvic floor disorders in patients treated at a referral center.
Methods
This retrospective observational study analyzed the records of 106 patients tested at our department from December 1999 to January 2017. The efficacy variables evaluated were the Global Response Assessment (range, 0%–100%) and, according to the clinical indication, other specific variables such International Consultation on Incontinence QuestionnaireShort Form, number of catheterizations or pads/day, and the numerical pain scale. The safety variables analyzed were complications (pain, migration, infection), reinterventions and explants. Patients’ quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction with the procedure were evaluated through telephone interviews.
Results
The clinical indications were overactive bladder (OAB) (n=36), urinary retention (UR) (n=37), bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC) (n=19), fecal incontinence (FI) (n=8), and double incontinence (DI) (n=6). The implant rates according to the clinical indication were as follows: OAB, 55.6%; UR, 56.8%; BPS/IC, 63.15%; FI, 87.5%; and DI, 66.7%. Clinical and/or statistically significant improvements in all efficacy variables were observed. Loss of therapeutic effect at 75 months of follow-up was observed in 34% of patients. Device-related pain appeared in 25 patients (39%); in 20 patients, it was resolved by reprogramming and 5 patients required device removal. An overall improvement in QoL and high levels of satisfaction with the procedure were observed. More than 90% of patients would recommend SNS to a friend or relative.
Conclusions
SNS is a minimally invasive procedure that offers a real alternative to patients with refractory pelvic floor dysfunction. Its safety profile is very favorable and it provides a long-lasting improvement in symptoms and QoL.

Keyword

Sacral neuromodulation; Efficacy; Bladder dysfunction; Fecal incontinence; Bladder pain syndrome
Full Text Links
  • INJ
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr