J Korean Foot Ankle Soc.  2021 Dec;25(4):171-176. 10.14193/jkfas.2021.25.4.171.

A Prospective Study Comparing Steroid Injection and Needle Fenestration for the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon St. Mary’s Hospital, Bucheon, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
This study sought to compare needle fenestration with a corticosteroid injection for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. We hypothesized that needle fenestration would be as effective as a corticosteroid injection while avoiding the potential adverse effects of the corticosteroid.
Materials and Methods
Forty female patients with unilateral chronic plantar fasciitis who did not respond to a minimum of 6 months of various conservative treatments were prospectively randomized to receive either a corticosteroid injection or needle fenestration. Visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score were used for all patients before treatment and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month following treatment.
Results
The corticosteroid injection group had a before-treatment average AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot score of 56.4, which increased to 87.3 at 3 months and 78.2 at 6 months after treatment but decreased to 62.4 at 12 months. The needle fenestration group had a before treatment average AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score of 49.5, which increased to 77.8 at 3 months and 92.1 at 6 months after treatment and remained at a high score of 89.4 at 12 months. There were no complications in either group.
Conclusion
In the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis, needle fenestration is as effective at 3- and 6-month post-treatment as a corticosteroid injection. Also, unlike a corticosteroid, its effect remains until 12 months post-treatment.

Keyword

Corticosteroid; Dry needling; Injections; Plantar fasciitis

Figure

  • Figure. 1 Photographs of steroid injection shows the 21-gauge needle is positioned in plane, along the axis of the plantar fascia, parallel to the transducer.

  • Figure. 2 Photograph (A) and ultrasound image (B) show the 18-gauge needle is positioned over the long axis of the plantar fascia and the tip fenestrated the plantar facia at the insertion site to the calcaneus (arrow).

  • Figure. 3 Visual analogue scale and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score over the follow-up period.


Reference

1. Cole C, Seto C, Gazewood J. 2005; Plantar fasciitis: evidence-based review of diagnosis and therapy. Am Fam Physician. 72:2237–42.
2. Williams SK, Brage M. 2004; Heel pain-plantar fasciitis and Achilles enthesopathy. Clin Sports Med. 23:123–44. doi: 10.1016/S0278-5919(03)00094-2. DOI: 10.1016/S0278-5919(03)00094-2. PMID: 15062587.
Article
3. Schepsis AA, Leach RE, Gorzyca J. Plantar fasciitis. Etiology, treatment, surgical results, and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991; (266):185–96. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199105000-00029. PMID: 2019049.
4. Gill LH, Kiebzak GM. 1996; Outcome of nonsurgical treatment for plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int. 17:527–32. doi: 10.1177/107110079601700903. DOI: 10.1177/107110079601700903. PMID: 8886778.
Article
5. Riddle DL, Schappert SM. 2004; Volume of ambulatory care visits and patterns of care for patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis: a national study of medical doctors. Foot Ankle Int. 25:303–10. doi: 10.1177/107110070402500505. DOI: 10.1177/107110070402500505. PMID: 15134610.
Article
6. Donley BG, Moore T, Sferra J, Gozdanovic J, Smith R. 2007; The efficacy of oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medication (NSAID) in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: a randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled study. Foot Ankle Int. 28:20–3. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0004. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0004. PMID: 17257533.
Article
7. Biswas C, Pal A, Acharya A. 2011; A comparative study of efficacy of oral nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents and locally injectable steroid for the treatment of plantar fasciitis. Anesth Essays Res. 5:158–61. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.94756. DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.94756. PMID: 25885380. PMCID: PMC4173392.
Article
8. Sun K, Zhou H, Jiang W. 2020; Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus other therapeutic methods for chronic plantar fasciitis. Foot Ankle Surg. 26:33–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.11.002. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.11.002. PMID: 30502222.
Article
9. Acevedo JI, Beskin JL. 1998; Complications of plantar fascia rupture associated with corticosteroid injection. Foot Ankle Int. 19:91–7. doi: 10.1177/107110079801900207. DOI: 10.1177/107110079801900207. PMID: 9498581.
Article
10. McMillan AM, Landorf KB, Gilheany MF, Bird AR, Morrow AD, Menz HB. 2012; Ultrasound guided corticosteroid injection for plantar fasciitis: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 344:e3260. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3260. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e3260. PMID: 22619193.
Article
11. Jiménez-Pérez AE, Gonzalez-Arabio D, Diaz AS, Maderuelo JA, Ramos-Pascua LR. 2019; Clinical and imaging effects of corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a comparative non randomized prospective study. Foot Ankle Surg. 25:354–60. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.01.005. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2018.01.005. PMID: 30321976.
Article
12. Chiavaras MM, Jacobson JA. 2013; Ultrasound-guided tendon fenestration. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 17:85–90. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333942. DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1333942. PMID: 23487340.
13. Yanbin X, Haikun C, Xiaofeng J, Wanshan Y, Shuangping L. 2015; Treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis with percutaneous latticed plantar fasciotomy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 54:856–9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.02.008. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2015.02.008. PMID: 26058817.
Article
14. Çatal B, Keskinbora M, Keskinöz EN, Tümentemur G, Azboy İ, Demiralp B. 2019; Percutaneous plantar fascia release with needle: anatomic evaluation with cadaveric specimens. J Foot Ankle Surg. 58:842–6. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.015. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.015. PMID: 31130478.
Article
15. Uygur E, Aktaş B, Eceviz E, Yilmazoğlu EG, Poyanli O. 2019; Preliminary report on the role of dry needling versus corticosteroid injection, an effective treatment method for plantar fasciitis: a randomized controlled trial. J Foot Ankle Surg. 58:301–5. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.058. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.08.058. PMID: 30850099.
Article
16. Iborra A, Villanueva M, Sanz-Ruiz P, Martin A, Noriega C. 2021; A novel closed technique for ultrasound-guided plantar fascia release with a needle: review of 107 cases with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. J Orthop Surg Res. 16:153. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02302-y. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02302-y. PMID: 33627158. PMCID: PMC7903032.
Article
17. Madeley NJ, Wing KJ, Topliss C, Penner MJ, Glazebrook MA, Younger AS. 2012; Responsiveness and validity of the SF-36, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, AOFAS Ankle Hindfoot Score, and Foot Function Index in end stage ankle arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 33:57–63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0057. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0057. PMID: 22381237.
Article
18. Lemont H, Ammirati KM, Usen N. 2003; Plantar fasciitis: a degenerative process (fasciosis) without inflammation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 93:234–7. doi: 10.7547/87507315-93-3-234. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-93-3-234. PMID: 12756315.
19. Benton-Weil W, Borrelli AH, Weil LS Jr. 1998; Percutaneous plantar fasciotomy: a minimally invasive procedure for recalcitrant plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 37:269–72. doi: 10.1016/S1067-2516(98)80061-6. DOI: 10.1016/S1067-2516(98)80061-6. PMID: 9710777.
Article
20. Gibbons R, Mackie KE, Beveridge T, Hince D, Ammon P. 2018; Evaluation of long-term outcomes following plantar fasciotomy. Foot Ankle Int. 39:1312–9. doi: 10.1177/1071100718788546. DOI: 10.1177/1071100718788546. PMID: 30066576.
Article
21. DiGiovanni BF, Moore AM, Zlotnicki JP, Pinney SJ. 2012; Preferred management of recalcitrant plantar fasciitis among orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 33:507–12. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0507. DOI: 10.3113/FAI.2012.0507. PMID: 22735325.
Article
22. Schneider HP, Baca JM, Carpenter BB, Dayton PD, Fleischer AE, Sachs BD. 2018; American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons clinical consensus statement: diagnosis and treatment of adult acquired infracalcaneal heel pain. J Foot Ankle Surg. 57:370–81. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.10.018. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.10.018. PMID: 29284574.
Article
23. Lee HS, Choi YR, Kim SW, Lee JY, Seo JH, Jeong JJ. 2014; Risk factors affecting chronic rupture of the plantar fascia. Foot Ankle Int. 35:258–63. doi: 10.1177/1071100713514564. DOI: 10.1177/1071100713514564. PMID: 24275488.
Article
24. Gurcay E, Kara M, Karaahmet OZ, Ata AM, Onat ŞŞ, Özçakar L. 2017; Shall we inject superficial or deep to the plantar fascia? An ultrasound study of the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 56:783–7. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.03.004. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.03.004. PMID: 28633777.
Article
25. Jain SK, Suprashant K, Kumar S, Yadav A, Kearns SR. 2018; Comparison of plantar fasciitis injected with platelet-rich plasma vs corticosteroids. Foot Ankle Int. 39:780–6. doi: 10.1177/1071100718762406. DOI: 10.1177/1071100718762406. PMID: 29600719.
Article
26. Fallat LM, Cox JT, Chahal R, Morrison P, Kish J. 2013; A retrospective comparison of percutaneous plantar fasciotomy and open plantar fasciotomy with heel spur resection. J Foot Ankle Surg. 52:288–90. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.10.005. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.10.005. PMID: 23473671.
Article
27. Nazarian LN, Gulvartian NV, Freeland EC, Chao W. 2018; Ultrasound-guided percutaneous needle fenestration and corticosteroid injection for anterior and anterolateral ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Spec. 11:61–6. doi: 10.1177/1938640017709904. DOI: 10.1177/1938640017709904. PMID: 28506083.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKFAS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr