KoreaMed, a service of the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors (KAMJE), provides access to articles published in Korean medical, dental, nursing, nutrition and veterinary journals. KoreaMed records include links to full-text content in Synapse and publisher web sites.
The dilemma regarding the management of condylar fractures generally revolves around the surgical approach, implant design, and the surgeon’s experience. Zide and Kent’s guidelines streamlined the decision making process for condylar fractures. However, there exists no standardized protocol for reduction and fixation of condylar fractures. Here, we have described a detailed and stepwise protocol, common to any surgical approach, that would lead to predictable, reproducible, and repeatable results in every surgeon’s hands.
Fig. 2
Lateralization and drilling of the proximal segment for fixation of screw in hole No. 2 of the four-hole with gap titanium miniplate.
Fig. 3
Screw fixations at hole No. 2 making the miniplate jut out laterally along the long axis of the proximal segment followed by anatomical reduction of the fracture by pulling the miniplate inferiorly towards the distal segment using the sharp end of periosteal elevator in hole No. 4.
4. Orabona GD, Abbate V, D'Amato S, Romano A, Iaconetta G. 2014; Surgical sequence of reduction in double mandibular fractures treatment. Ann Ital Chir. 85:207–13. PMID: 25073686.
7. Kanno T, Sukegawa S, Fujioka M, Takabatake K, Furuki Y. 2011; Transoral open reduction with rigid internal fixation for subcondylar fractures of the mandible using a small angulated screwdriver system: is endoscopic assistance necessary? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 69:e372–84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.040
. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.02.040. PMID: 21684653. Article