Asian Spine J.
2021 Oct;15(5):710-712. 10.31616/asj.2021.0395.r2.
Response to: Letter to the Editor, Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Affiliations
-
- 1Tecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico
- 2Departamento de Neurología y Neurocirugía, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
- KMID: 2521564
- DOI: http://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0395.r2
- Full Text Links
-
- Actions
-
Cited
- CITED
-
- Close
- Share
-
- Similar articles
-
- Letter to the Editor: Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Minimally Invasive Surgery versus Open Surgery for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Corrigendum to “Full-Endoscopic versus Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis” by Son et al. (J Korean Neurosurg Soc 65 : 539-548, 2022)
- Letter to the Editor Regarding “Prevalence of Intracranial Aneurysm in Patients with Aortopathy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses”
