J Korean Med Sci.  2021 Oct;36(41):e257. 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e257.

The Value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in Evaluating Disease Severity and Prognosis in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
Several parameters are useful for assessing disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF); however, the role of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT) is not well-defined. We aimed to evaluate the value of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for assessing disease severity and prognosis in IPF patients.
Methods
Clinical data of 89 IPF patients (mean age: 68.1 years, male: 94%) who underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of lung nodules or cancer staging were retrospectively reviewed. Mean and maximal standardized uptake values (SUV mean , SUV max , respectively) were measured in the fibrotic area. Adjusted SUV, including SUV ratio (SUVR, defined as SUV max -to-liver SUV mean ratio), tissue fraction-corrected SUV mean (SUV meanTF ), and SUVR (SUVRTF ), and tissue-to-blood ratio (SUV max /SUV mean venous; TBR blood ) were obtained. Death was defined as the primary outcome, and associations between other clinical parameters (lung function, exercise capacity, C-reactive protein [CRP] level) were also investigated.
Results
All SUV parameters were inversely correlated with the forced vital capacity, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, and positively correlated with CRP level and the gender-agephysiology index. The SUV mean , SUV max , and SUV meanTF were associated with changes in lung function at six months. The SUVR (hazard ratio [HR], 1.738; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.011–2.991), SUVR TF (HR, 1.441; 95% CI, 1.000–2.098), and TBR blood (HR, 1.377; 95% CI, 1.038–1.827) were significant predictors for mortality in patients with IPF in the univariate analysis, but not in the multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
18 F-FDG PET/CT may provide additional information on the disease severity and prognosis in IPF patients, and the SUVR may be superior to other SUV parameters.

Keyword

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography; Standard Uptake Value; Severity of Illness Index

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Flowchart of the study.18F-FDG PET/CT = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

  • Fig. 2 Measurement of the standardized uptake value in the fibrotic area in 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography images. (A) A coronal PET image. (B) A horizontal PET image. (C) A CT image. (D) A combined PET and CT fusion image. The red circles indicate the 1 cm diameter area centering on the highest 18F-FDG uptake in fibrotic areas. Both maximum standardized uptake value and mean standardized uptake value were measured in this circle.18F-FDG = 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose, PET = positron emission tomography, CT = computed tomography.

  • Fig. 3 Scatter plot depicting the correlation between standardized uptake value ratio and clinical parameters. (A) FVC. (B) DLco. (C) TLC. (D) 6MWD. (E) Resting SpO2. (F) Lowest SpO2. (G) C-reactive protein. H. GAP index.FVC = forced vital capacity, DLco = diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, TLC = total lung capacity, 6MWD = six-minute walk distance, SpO2 = peripheral saturation of oxygen, GAP = gender-age-physiology, SUVR = standardized uptake value ratio.


Reference

1. Ley B, Collard HR, King TE Jr, King J. Clinical course and prediction of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011; 183(4):431–440. PMID: 20935110.
Article
2. Raghu G, Rochwerg B, Zhang Y, Garcia CA, Azuma A, Behr J, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline: treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An update of the 2011 clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015; 192(2):e3–19. PMID: 26177183.
Article
3. Shah NR, Noble P, Jackson RM, King TE Jr, Nathan SD, Padilla M, et al. A critical assessment of treatment options for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2005; 22(3):167–174. PMID: 16315778.
Article
4. Collard HR, King TE Jr, Bartelson BB, Vourlekis JS, Schwarz MI, Brown KK. Changes in clinical and physiologic variables predict survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 168(5):538–542. PMID: 12773325.
Article
5. Flaherty KR, Mumford JA, Murray S, Kazerooni EA, Gross BH, Colby TV, et al. Prognostic implications of physiologic and radiographic changes in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003; 168(5):543–548. PMID: 12773329.
Article
6. Caminati A, Bianchi A, Cassandro R, Mirenda MR, Harari S. Walking distance on 6-MWT is a prognostic factor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med. 2009; 103(1):117–123. PMID: 18786822.
Article
7. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005; 26(2):319–338. PMID: 16055882.
8. McLean A, Warren PM, Gillooly M, MacNee W, Lamb D. Microscopic and macroscopic measurements of emphysema: relation to carbon monoxide gas transfer. Thorax. 1992; 47(3):144–149. PMID: 1519189.
Article
9. Trip P, Nossent EJ, de Man FS, van den Berk IA, Boonstra A, Groepenhoff H, et al. Severely reduced diffusion capacity in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: patient characteristics and treatment responses. Eur Respir J. 2013; 42(6):1575–1585. PMID: 23949959.
Article
10. Chugani HT, Phelps ME, Mazziotta JC. Positron emission tomography study of human brain functional development. Ann Neurol. 1987; 22(4):487–497. PMID: 3501693.
Article
11. Erasmus JJ, Patz EF Jr. Positron emission tomography imaging in the thorax. Clin Chest Med. 1999; 20(4):715–724. PMID: 10587793.
Article
12. Almuhaideb A, Papathanasiou N, Bomanji J. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology. Ann Saudi Med. 2011; 31(1):3–13. PMID: 21245592.
Article
13. Griffeth LK. Use of PET/CT scanning in cancer patients: technical and practical considerations. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005; 18(4):321–330. PMID: 16252023.
Article
14. Groves AM, Win T, Screaton NJ, Berovic M, Endozo R, Booth H, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and diffuse parenchymal lung disease: implications from initial experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2009; 50(4):538–545. PMID: 19289428.
Article
15. El-Chemaly S, Malide D, Yao J, Nathan SD, Rosas IO, Gahl WA, et al. Glucose transporter-1 distribution in fibrotic lung disease: association with [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-PET scan uptake, inflammation, and neovascularization. Chest. 2013; 143(6):1685–1691. PMID: 23699745.
16. Lee EY, Wong CS, Fung SL, Yan PK, Ho JC. SUV as an adjunct in evaluating disease activity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - a pilot study. Nucl Med Commun. 2014; 35(6):631–637. PMID: 24472818.
Article
17. Nobashi T, Kubo T, Nakamoto Y, Handa T, Koyasu S, Ishimori T, et al. 18F-FDG uptake in less affected lung field provides prognostic stratification in patients with interstitial lung disease. J Nucl Med. 2016; 57(12):1899–1904. PMID: 27339874.
Article
18. Justet A, Laurent-Bellue A, Thabut G, Dieudonné A, Debray MP, Borie R, et al. [18F]FDG PET/CT predicts progression-free survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Res. 2017; 18(1):74. PMID: 28449678.
Article
19. Castiaux A, Van Simaeys G, Goldman S, Bondue B. Assessment of 18F-FDG uptake in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: influence of lung density changes. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2018; 2(1):27.
Article
20. Richeldi L, Costabel U, Selman M, Kim DS, Hansell DM, Nicholson AG, et al. Efficacy of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2011; 365(12):1079–1087. PMID: 21992121.
Article
21. Lee SH, Yeo Y, Kim TH, Lee HL, Lee JH, Park YB, et al. Korean guidelines for diagnosis and management of interstitial lung diseases: part 2. idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2019; 82(2):102–117. PMID: 30841014.
Article
22. Wanger J, Clausen JL, Coates A, Pedersen OF, Brusasco V, Burgos F, et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J. 2005; 26(3):511–522. PMID: 16135736.
Article
23. Macintyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, Johnson DC, van der Grinten CP, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2005; 26(4):720–735. PMID: 16204605.
Article
24. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002; 166(1):111–117. PMID: 12091180.
25. Ley B, Ryerson CJ, Vittinghoff E, Ryu JH, Tomassetti S, Lee JS, et al. A multidimensional index and staging system for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 156(10):684–691. PMID: 22586007.
Article
26. Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, Jenkins G, Kondoh Y, Lederer DJ, et al. Acute Exacerbation of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An International Working Group Report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016; 194(3):265–275. PMID: 27299520.
Article
27. Thie JA. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45(9):1431–1434. PMID: 15347707.
28. Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H, Kawada H, Noda Y, et al. Adrenal-to-liver SUV ratio is the best parameter for differentiation of adrenal metastases from adenomas using 18F-FDG PET/CT. Ann Nucl Med. 2013; 27(7):648–653. PMID: 23625579.
Article
29. Lambrou T, Groves AM, Erlandsson K, Screaton N, Endozo R, Win T, et al. The importance of correction for tissue fraction effects in lung PET: preliminary findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011; 38(12):2238–2246. PMID: 21874321.
Article
30. Win T, Screaton NJ, Porter JC, Ganeshan B, Maher TM, Fraioli F, et al. Pulmonary 18F-FDG uptake helps refine current risk stratification in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; 45(5):806–815. PMID: 29335764.
31. Nathan SD, Albera C, Bradford WZ, Costabel U, du Bois RM, Fagan EA, et al. Effect of continued treatment with pirfenidone following clinically meaningful declines in forced vital capacity: analysis of data from three phase 3 trials in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Thorax. 2016; 71(5):429–435. PMID: 26968970.
Article
32. Nakazawa S, Shimizu K, Mogi A, Kuwano H. Low diffusing capacity, emphysema, or pulmonary fibrosis: who is truly pulling the lung cancer strings? J Thorac Dis. 2018; 10(2):600–602. PMID: 29607119.
Article
33. Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. J Nucl Med. 2004; 45(9):1519–1527. PMID: 15347719.
34. Bural GG, Torigian DA, Chen W, Houseni M, Basu S, Alavi A. Increased 18F-FDG uptake within the reticuloendothelial system in patients with active lung cancer on PET imaging may indicate activation of the systemic immune response. Hell J Nucl Med. 2010; 13(1):23–25. PMID: 20411166.
35. Liu G, Hu Y, Zhao Y, Yu H, Hu P, Shi H.Variations of the liver standardized uptake value in relation to background blood metabolism: an 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography study in a large population from China. Medicine. 2018; 97(19):e0699. PMID: 29742723.
36. Tomassetti S, Gurioli C, Ryu JH, Decker PA, Ravaglia C, Tantalocco P, et al. The impact of lung cancer on survival of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2015; 147(1):157–164. PMID: 25166895.
Article
37. Lee HY, Cho J, Kwak N, Lee J, Park YS, Lee CH, et al. Prognostic impact of malignant diseases in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):18260. PMID: 33106517.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr