Yeungnam Univ J Med.  2021 Jul;38(3):240-244. 10.12701/yujm.2020.00507.

The diagnosis of an imperforate anus in female fetuses

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea
  • 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
  • 4Department of Pediatrics, Kyungpook National University Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea

Abstract

Imperforate anus is an anomaly caused by a defect in the development of the hindgut during early pregnancy. It is a relatively common congenital malformation and is more common in males. Although there are cases of a solitary imperforate anus, the condition is more commonly found as a part of a wider spectrum of other congenital anomalies. Although urgent reconstructive anorectal surgery is not necessary, immediate evaluation is important and urgent decompressive surgery may be required. Moreover, as there are often other anomalies that can affect management, prenatal diagnosis can help in optimizing perinatal care and prepare parents through prenatal counseling. In the past, imperforate anus was diagnosed by prenatal ultrasonography based on indirect signs such as bowel dilatation or intraluminal calcified meconium. Currently, it is diagnosed by directly checking the perineum with prenatal ultrasonography. Despite advances in ultrasound technology, accurate prenatal diagnosis is impossible in most cases and imperforate anus is detected after birth. Here, we present two cases of imperforate anus in female fetuses that were not diagnosed prenatally.

Keyword

Female fetus; Imperforate anus; Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasonography

Figure

  • Fig. 1. The images of fetal ultrasonography of case 1. (A) At 30 weeks of gestation, there is an echogenic ring (open arrow) in the hypoechogenic area (solid arrow), suggesting an intact anus with a rather short perineal body (arrowhead). (B) At 35 weeks of gestation, a short perineal body (arrowhead) is revealed, and an echogenic ring (open arrow) indicating the anal mucosa in the hypoechogenic area (solid arrow) is seen.

  • Fig. 2. Postnatal finding of case 1. No anal opening in the original location is present (arrow). A vestibular fistula is accompanied (arrowhead).

  • Fig. 3. The image of fetal ultrasonography of case 2. At 30 weeks of gestation, the perineum is seen, and an intact anus is suspected because of the hyperechogenic ring indicating anal mucosa (open arrow) in normal sphincter muscles (solid arrow), despite the short perineal body (arrowhead). After birth, the baby was diagnosed with a low-type imperforate anus with a vestibular fistula.


Reference

References

1. Cuschieri A; EUROCAT Working Group. Anorectal anomalies associated with or as part of other anomalies. Am J Med Genet. 2002; 110:122–30.
Article
2. Brantberg A, Blaas HG, Haugen SE, Isaksen CV, Eik-Nes SH. Imperforate anus: a relatively common anomaly rarely diagnosed prenatally. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 28:904–10.
Article
3. Cho S, Moore SP, Fangman T. One hundred three consecutive patients with anorectal malformations and their associated anomalies. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155:587–91.
Article
4. Stoll C, Alembik Y, Dott B, Roth MP. Associated malformations in patients with anorectal anomalies. Eur J Med Genet. 2007; 50:281–90.
Article
5. Lee MY, Won HS, Shim JY, Lee PR, Kim A, Lee BS, et al. Sonographic determination of type in a fetal imperforate anus. J Ultrasound Med. 2016; 35:1285–91.
Article
6. Black CT, Sherman JO. The association of low imperforate anus and Down’s syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1989; 24:92–4.
Article
7. Torres R, Levitt MA, Tovilla JM, Rodriguez G, Peña A. Anorectal malformations and Down’s syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33:194–7.
Article
8. Bean WJ, Calonje MA, Aprill CN, Geshner J. Anal atresia: a prenatal ultrasound diagnosis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1978; 6:111–2.
Article
9. Taipale P, Rovamo L, Hiilesmaa V. First-trimester diagnosis of imperforate anus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 25:187–8.
Article
10. Harris RD, Nyberg DA, Mack LA, Weinberger E. Anorectal atresia: prenatal sonographic diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 149:395–400.
Article
11. Hearn-Stebbins B, Sherer DM, Abramowicz JS, Hess HM, Woods JR Jr. Prenatal sonographic features associated with an imperforate anus and rectourethral fistula. J Clin Ultrasound. 1991; 19:508–12.
Article
12. Bronshtein M, Zimmer EZ. Early sonographic detection of fetal intestinal obstruction and possible diagnostic pitfalls. Prenat Diagn. 1996; 16:203–6.
Article
13. Grant T, Newman M, Gould R, Schey W, Perry R, Brandt T. Intraluminal colonic calcifications associated with anorectal atresia: prenatal sonographic detection. J Ultrasound Med. 1990; 9:411–3.
Article
14. Mandell J, Lillehei CW, Greene M, Benacerraf BR. The prenatal diagnosis of imperforate anus with rectourinary fistula: dilated fetal colon with enterolithiasis. J Pediatr Surg. 1992; 27:82–4.
Article
15. Shalev E, Weiner E, Zuckerman H. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of intestinal calcifications with imperforate anus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1983; 62:95–6.
Article
16. Lubusky M, Prochazka M, Dhaifalah I, Horak D, Geierova M, Santavy J. Fetal enterolithiasis: prenatal sonographic and MRI diagnosis in two cases of urorectal septum malformation (URSM) sequence. Prenat Diagn. 2006; 26:345–9.
Article
17. Shimotake T, Higuchi K, Tsuda T, Aoi S, Iwai N. Infrared spectrophotometry of intraluminal meconium calculi in a neonate with imperforate anus and rectourethral fistula. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41:1173–6.
Article
18. Guzman ER, Ranzini A, Day-Salvatore D, Weinberger B, Spigland N, Vintzileos A. The prenatal ultrasonographic visualization of imperforate anus in monoamniotic twins. J Ultrasound Med. 1995; 14:547–51.
Article
19. Ochoa JH, Chiesa M, Vildoza RP, Wong AE, Sepulveda W. Evaluation of the perianal muscular complex in the prenatal diagnosis of anorectal atresia in a high-risk population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 39:521–7.
Article
Full Text Links
  • YUJM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr