Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2021 Jul;64(4):345-352. 10.5468/ogs.21067.

Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact rates of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome?

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada
  • 2McGill University Health Centre Reproductive Centre, Montreal, Canada

Abstract


Objective
Does the timing of cabergoline administration impact the rate of mild/moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with a GnRH agonist trigger?
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of 285 in-vitro fertilization patients at risk of OHSS who received a GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2019 at McGill University Health Centre. Group 1 (Trig, n=101) began taking cabergoline 0.5 mg orally for 7 days at the time of GnRH agonist trigger, while Group 2 (Retriev, n=184) started taking cabergoline on the day of oocyte retrieval. The rates of OHSS were then compared between the groups using analysis of variance and chi-square analysis, where appropriate.
Results
The baseline demographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. Trig appeared to be at a slightly higher risk of OHSS based on a significantly higher antral follicle count (20.2±4.2 vs. 19.0±4.3; P=0.02), higher number of stimulated follicles >10 mm at trigger (25.7±7.0 vs. 22.8±8.3, P=0.003), and higher peak serum E2 level (17,325±2,542 vs. 14,822±3,098; P=0.0001). The Trig group had lower rates of mild and moderate OHSS (24% vs. 36%; P=0.045). Neither group had any patients who developed severe OHSS. Trig had fewer patients presenting with pelvic free fluid (13% vs. 23%; P=0.03), lower hematocrit (37.8±4.8% vs. 40.5±4.2%; P=0.0001), higher albumin concentrations (30.4±2.7 vs. 29.5±2.0; P=0.01), and lower potassium concentrations (3.9±0.5 vs. 4.2±0.7; P=0.0002).
Conclusion
Cabergoline at the time of trigger as compared to the time of collection should be investigated to assess its role in reducing the rates of mild/moderate OHSS.

Keyword

Cabergoline; fertilization; Gonadotropin-releasing hormone; Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

Reference

References

1. Garcia-Velasco JA. How to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a new indication for dopamine agonists. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009; 18(Suppl 2):71–5.
Article
2. Corbett S, Shmorgun D, Claman P. Reproductive Endocrinology Infertility Committee; Special Contributor. The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014; 36:1024–33.
Article
3. Schirmer DA 3rd, Kulkarni AD, Zhang Y, Kawwass JF, Boulet SL, Kissin DM. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after assisted reproductive technologies: trends, predictors, and pregnancy outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2020; 114:567–78.
Article
4. Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Humaidan P, Kol S, Banker M, Devroey P, et al. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger and “freeze-all approach in GnRH antagonist protocol. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101:1008–11.
Article
5. Gurbuz AS, Gode F, Ozcimen N, Isik AZ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist trigger and freeze-all strategy does not prevent severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a report of three cases. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29:541–4.
Article
6. Mahajan N, Gupta S, Sharma S, Rani K, Naidu P, Arora PR. Early onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome despite use of segmentation approach and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prophylaxis. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2015; 8:234–8.
Article
7. Tang H, Hunter T, Hu Y, Zhai SD, Sheng X, Hart RJ. Cabergoline for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (2):CD008605.
Article
8. Shaltout A, Shohyab A, Youssef MA. Can dopamine agonist at a low dose reduce ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women at risk undergoing ICSI treatment cycles? A randomized controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012; 165:254–8.
Article
9. Gille H, Kowalski J, Li B, LeCouter J, Moffat B, Zioncheck TF, et al. Analysis of biological effects and signaling properties of Flt-1 (VEGFR-1) and KDR (VEGFR-2). A reassessment using novel receptor-specific vascular endothelial growth factor mutants. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276:3222–30.
10. Kılıç N, Özdemir Ö, Başar HC, Demircan F, Ekmez F, Yücel O. Cabergoline for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women at risk undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment cycles: a randomized controlled study. Avicenna J Med. 2015; 5:123–7.
11. Ferraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Diotallevi L, Festi C, Trounson A. Dopamine treatment for severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod. 1992; 7:180–3.
Article
12. Baumgarten M, Polanski L, Campbell B, Raine-Fenning N. Do dopamine agonists prevent or reduce the severity of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing assisted reproduction a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Fertil. 2013; 16:168–74.
Article
13. Leitao VM, Moroni RM, Seko LM, Nastri CO, Martins WP. Cabergoline for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril. 2014; 101:664–75.
Article
14. Tang H, Mourad S, Zhai SD, Hart RJ. Dopamine agonists for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 11:CD008605.
Article
15. Seow KM, Lin YH, Bai CH, Chen HJ, Hsieh BC, Huang LW, et al. Clinical outcome according to timing of cabergoline initiation for prevention of OHSS: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013; 26:562–8.
Article
16. Zimmermann RC, Hartman T, Kavic S, Pauli SA, Bohlen P, Sauer MV, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2-mediated angiogenesis is essential for gonadotropin-dependent follicle development. J Clin Invest. 2003; 112:659–69.
Article
17. Gaafar S, El-Gezary D, El Maghraby HA. Early onset of cabergoline therapy for prophylaxis from ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a potentially safer and more effective protocol. Reprod Biol. 2019; 19:145–8.
Article
18. Alvarez C, Alonso-Muriel I, García G, Crespo J, Bellver J, Simón C, et al. Implantation is apparently unaffected by the dopamine agonist Cabergoline when administered to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22:3210–4.
Article
19. Timmons D, Montrief T, Koyfman A, Long B. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a review for emergency clinicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2019; 37:1577–84.
Article
20. Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2004; 81:19–25.
21. Seyhan A, Ata B, Polat M, Son WY, Yarali H, Dahan MH. Severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following GnRH agonist trigger with the addition of 1500 IU hCG. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28:2522–8.
Article
22. Ata B, Seyhan A, Polat M, Son WY, Yarali H, Dahan M. Reply: GnRHa trigger and modified luteal support with one bolus of hCG should be used with caution in extreme responder patients. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28:2594–5.
Article
23. Rose BI. Approaches to oocyte retrieval for advanced reproductive technology cycles planning to utilize in vitro maturation: a review of the many choices to be made. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014; 31:1409–19.
Article
24. Navot D, Bergh PA, Laufer N. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment. Fertil Steril. 1992; 58:249–61.
Full Text Links
  • OGS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr