Osong Public Health Res Perspect.  2016 Apr;7(2):131-137. 10.1016/j.phrp.2016.02.004.

Comparing Seasonal Pattern of Laboratory Confirmed Cases of Pertussis with Clinically Suspected Cases

Affiliations
  • 1Health Deputy, Mazandaran University of Medical Science, Sari, Iran
  • 2Center for Communicable Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
  • 3Health Sciences Research Center, Faculty of Health, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  • 4Department of Community Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran

Abstract


Objectives
During recent decades, there has been limited attention on the seasonal pattern of pertussis within a high vaccine coverage population. This study aimed to compare the seasonal patterns of clinical suspected pertussis cases with those of laboratory confirmed cases in Iran.
Methods
The current study was conducted using time series methods. Time variables included months and seasons during 2011–2013. The effects of seasons and months on the incidence of pertussis were estimated using analysis of variance or Kruskal–Wallis.
Results
The maximum average incidence of clinically confirmed pertussis was 23.3 in July (p = 0.04), but the maximum incidence of clinical suspected pertussis was 115.7 in May (p = 0.6). The maximum seasonal incidences of confirmed and clinical pertussis cases were reported in summer (average: 12, p = 0.004), and winter (average: 108.1; p = 0.4), respectively.
Conclusion
The present study showed that the seasonal pattern of laboratory confirmed pertussis cases is highly definite and different from the pattern of clinical suspected cases.

Keyword

epidemiologic; pertussis; seasonal; time series
Full Text Links
  • OPHRP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr