Korean J Pain.  2021 Jun;34(3):339-345. 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.339.

Prediction of successful caudal epidural injection using color Doppler ultrasonography in the paramedian sagittal oblique view of the lumbosacral spine

• Yoo SW
• Ki MJ
• Doo AR
• Woo CJ
• Kim YS
• Son JS

• KMID: 2517518
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2021.34.3.339

Abstract

Background
Ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection (CEI) is limited in that it cannot confirm drug distribution at the target site without fluoroscopy. We hypothesized that visualization of solution flow through the inter-laminar space of the lumbosacral spine using color Doppler ultrasound alone would allow for confirmation of drug distribution. Therefore, we aimed to prospectively evaluate the usefulness of this method by comparing the color Doppler image in the paramedian sagittal oblique view of the lumbosacral spine (LS-PSOV) with the distribution of the contrast medium observed during fluoroscopy.
Methods
Sixty-five patients received a 10-mL CEI of solution containing contrast medium under ultrasound guidance. During injection, flow was observed in the LSPSOV using color Doppler ultrasonography, following which it was confirmed using fluoroscopy. The presence of contrast image at L5-S1 on fluoroscopy was defined as “successful CEI.” We then calculated prediction accuracy for successful CEI using color Doppler ultrasonography in the LS-PSOV. We also investigated the correlation between the distribution levels measured via color Doppler and fluoroscopy.
Results
Prediction accuracy with color Doppler ultrasonography was 96.9%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.7%, 100%, 100%, and 60.0%, respectively. In 52 of 65 patients (80%), the highest level at which contrast image was observed was the same for both color Doppler ultrasonography and fluoroscopy.
Conclusions
Our findings demonstrate that color Doppler ultrasonography in the LS-PSOV is a new method for determining whether a drug solution reaches the lumbosacral region (i.e., the main target level) without the need for fluoroscopy.

Keyword

Anesthesia; Caudal; Contrast Media; Equivalence Trial; Fluoroscopy; Injections; Epidural; Low Back Pain; Lumbar Vertebrae; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography; Doppler; Color; Ultrasonography; Interventional

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Ultrasound paramedian sagittal oblique view (PSOV) of the lumbosacral level (A). The patient was in the prone position, and the convex ultrasound probe was placed on the patient’s back aligned to the sagittal plane (median sagittal view). The sacrum can be recognized as a horizontal high-echo curve structure, and the L5 layer has a typical “serrated” shape. After checking the sacrum, the sacrum is placed on the right side of the ultrasound window through the cephalad shift of the probe, and the L3 spinous process is visible on the left side. The probe was then shifted by 1-2 fingers in the left lateral direction to ensure that the lamina was visible (paramedian sagittal view). The probe was then tilted slightly toward the midline of the spine (PSOV). In the image presented here, a serrated laminar shape is visible, and hyperechoic shadows of the anterior complex and posterior complex including the dura mater can be observed between the lamina of each level. The color Doppler in (A) shows that the injection flow has reached L5-S1. (B) is a color Doppler image of another patient performed in the same way. The drug solution rises from the caudal region to the cephalad, and Doppler flow can be observed between each lamina. Doppler flow can be observed at L5-S1, L4-L5, and L3-L4, and the anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy images show that the contrast medium is distributed at the corresponding levels.

• 

  Fig. 2 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram.

• 

  Fig. 3 The figure shows the correlation between the highest level of injection flow measured using color Doppler ultrasonography in the paramedian sagittal oblique view at the lumbosacral level (LS-PSOV) and the highest level at which contrast image was identified using fluoroscopy. In 52 of 65 patients (80%), the highest level at which image (Doppler flow or contrast medium) was observed was the same for both color Doppler ultrasonography and fluoroscopy: not detected (n = 3), L5-S1 (n = 22), L4-L5 (n = 24), L3-L4 (n = 3). The difference in the level measured by the two modalities was one level in 11 patients and two levels in two patients (16.9% and 3.0%, respectively). ND: not detected.

Reference

1. Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, Hancock MJ, Oliveira VC, McLachlan AJ, et al. 2020; Epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbosacral radicular pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 4:CD013577. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013577. PMID: 32271952. PMCID: PMC7145384.

2. Oliveira CB, Maher CG, Ferreira ML, Hancock MJ, Oliveira VC, McLachlan AJ, et al. 2020; Epidural corticosteroid injections for sciatica: an abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 45:E1405–15. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003651. PMID: 32890301.

3. Yang S, Kim W, Kong HH, Do KH, Choi KH. 2020; Epidural steroid injection versus conservative treatment for patients with lumbosacral radicular pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 99:e21283. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021283. PMID: 32791709. PMCID: PMC7386972.

4. McLain RF, Kapural L, Mekhail NA. 2005; Epidural steroid therapy for back and leg pain: mechanisms of action and efficacy. Spine J. 5:191–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.046. PMID: 15749619.

5. Stitz MY, Sommer HM. 1999; Accuracy of blind versus fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injection. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 24:1371–6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00016. PMID: 10404581.

6. Barham G, Hilton A. 2010; Caudal epidurals: the accuracy of blind needle placement and the value of a confirmatory epidurogram. Eur Spine J. 19:1479–83. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1469-8. PMID: 20512512. PMCID: PMC2989280.

7. el-Khoury GY, Ehara S, Weinstein JN, Montgomery WJ, Kathol MH. 1988; Epidural steroid injection: a procedure ideally performed with fluoroscopic control. Radiology. 168:554–7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.168.2.2969118. PMID: 2969118.

8. Nikooseresht M, Hashemi M, Mohajerani SA, Shahandeh F, Agah M. 2014; Ultrasound as a screening tool for performing caudal epidural injections. Iran J Radiol. 11:e13262. DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.13262. PMID: 25035698. PMCID: PMC4090639.

9. Chen CP, Tang SF, Hsu TC, Tsai WC, Liu HP, Chen MJ, et al. 2004; Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 101:181–4. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00028. PMID: 15220789.

10. Kim YH, Park HJ, Cho S, Moon DE. 2014; Assessment of factors affecting the difficulty of caudal epidural injections in adults using ultrasound. Pain Res Manag. 19:275–9. DOI: 10.1155/2014/679128. PMID: 25111987. PMCID: PMC4197755.

11. Yoon JS, Sim KH, Kim SJ, Kim WS, Koh SB, Kim BJ. 2005; The feasibility of color Doppler ultrasonography for caudal epidural steroid injection. Pain. 118:210–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.014. PMID: 16213088.

12. Renfrew DL, Moore TE, Kathol MH, el-Khoury GY, Lemke JH, Walker CW. 1991; Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 12:1003–7. PMID: 1719788.

13. Manchikanti L, Cash KA, Pampati V, McManus CD, Damron KS. 2004; Evaluation of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural injections. Pain Physician. 7:81–92. DOI: 10.36076/ppj.2004/7/81. PMID: 16868617.

14. Huang J. 2005; Disadvantages of ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 102:693. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200503000-00034. PMID: 15731614.

15. Yoo S, Kim Y, Park SK, Ji SH, Kim JT. 2020; Ultrasonography for lumbar neuraxial block. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 15:397–408. DOI: 10.17085/apm.20065. PMID: 33329842. PMCID: PMC7724125.

16. Chin KJ, Karmakar MK, Peng P. 2011; Ultrasonography of the adult thoracic and lumbar spine for central neuraxial blockade. Anesthesiology. 114:1459–85. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318210f9f8. PMID: 21422997.

17. Van Besien J, Uvin P, Hermie I, Tailly T, Merckx L. 2017; Ultrasonography is not inferior to fluoroscopy to guide extracorporeal shock waves during treatment of renal and upper ureteric calculi: a randomized prospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2017:7802672. DOI: 10.1155/2017/7802672. PMID: 28589147. PMCID: PMC5447263.

18. El-Yahchouchi C, Geske JR, Carter RE, Diehn FE, Wald JT, Murthy NS, et al. 2013; The noninferiority of the nonparticulate steroid dexamethasone vs the particulate steroids betamethasone and triamcinolone in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections. Pain Med. 14:1650–7. DOI: 10.1111/pme.12214. PMID: 23899304.

19. Yokoyama M, Hanazaki M, Fujii H, Mizobuchi S, Nakatsuka H, Takahashi T, et al. 2004; Correlation between the distribution of contrast medium and the extent of blockade during epidural anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 100:1504–10. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00024. PMID: 15166571.

20. Senkal S, Sir E. 2021; Comparison of ultrasonography and conventional fluoroscopy guided caudal epidural injection in chronic low back pain. Turk Neurosurg. 31:119–23. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.31515-20.2. PMID: 33372261.

21. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Twickler DM. 2009; Effect of maternal obesity on the ultrasound detection of anomalous fetuses. Obstet Gynecol. 113:1001–7. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a1d2f5. PMID: 19384114.

22. Modica MJ, Kanal KM, Gunn ML. 2011; The obese emergency patient: imaging challenges and solutions. Radiographics. 31:811–23. DOI: 10.1148/rg.313105138. PMID: 21571658.

23. Doo AR, Kim JW, Lee JH, Han YJ, Son JS. 2015; A comparison of two techniques for ultrasound-guided caudal injection: the influence of the depth of the inserted needle on caudal block. Korean J Pain. 28:122–8. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.2.122. PMID: 25852834. PMCID: PMC4387457.

24. El-Boghdadly K, Pawa A, Chin KJ. 2018; Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: current perspectives. Local Reg Anesth. 11:35–44. DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S154512. PMID: 30122981. PMCID: PMC6087022.

25. Doo AR, Lee J, Yeo GE, Lee KH, Kim YS, Mun JH, et al. 2020; The prevalence and clinical significance of transitional vertebrae: a radiologic investigation using whole spine spiral three-dimensional computed tomographic images. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 15:103–10. DOI: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.1.103. PMID: 33329798. PMCID: PMC7713870.