J Korean Med Sci.  2021 Jun;36(24):e176. 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e176.

Utility of Radial Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound Guided Transbronchial Lung Biopsy in Bronchus Sign Negative Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University and Respiratory Center, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Korea

Abstract

Background
The presence of the bronchus sign on chest computed tomography is associated with an increased diagnostic yield of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound– guided transbronchial lung biopsy (RP-EBUS-TBLB). However, the utility of RP-EBUS-TBLB for bronchus sign negative peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains unknown. We investigated the utility of RP-EBUS-TBLB in bronchus sign negative PPLs.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed data from 109 patients who underwent RP-EBUS for bronchus sign negative PPLs from January 2019 to August 2020. TBLB was performed using RP-EBUS with a guide sheath and without fluoroscopy. The EBUS visualization and TBLB diagnostic yields were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors affecting the EBUS visualization and diagnostic yields.
Results
The EBUS visualization yield was 74.1% (68/109). Of the 109 lung lesions, 92 were definitively diagnosed. The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 50.5% (55/109), 34.9% (29/83), 100% (26/26), 100% (29/29), and 32.5% (26/80), respectively. In multivariable analyses, the size of the lesion (≥ 20 mm; odds ratio [OR], 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–5.93; P = 0.021) and the distance from the pleura (> 10 mm; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.02–5.52; P = 0.045) were associated with EBUS visualization. Regarding diagnostic yield, having the probe within the lesion (OR, 28.50; 95% CI, 6.26–129.85; P < 0.001) and a solid lesion (OR, 14.58; 95% CI, 2.64–80.38; P = 0.002) were associated with diagnostic success. Pneumothorax and hemoptysis occurred in 3.7% (4/109) and 0.9% (1/109), respectively, of the patients.
Conclusion
RP-EBUS-TBLB using a GS can be considered a diagnostic method in bronchus sign negative solid PPLs. Having the probe within the lesion and a solid lesion were important for diagnostic success. Complication rates were acceptable.

Keyword

Diagnosis; Biopsy; Bronchoscopy; Ultrasonography

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Study flowchart.EBUS = endobronchial ultrasound, PPL = peripheral pulmonary lesion, RP-EBUS = radial probe EBUS.

  • Fig. 2 Representative cases. (A) CT scan showing a 12 mm sized nodule. (B) CT scan showing a 32 mm sized solid nodule. (C) RP-EBUS in the superior segment of the right lower lobe showing an EBUS image within the lesion and biopsy revealed squamous cell carcinoma. (D) RP-EBUS in the superior segment of the right lower lobe showing an EBUS image adjacent to the lesion and biopsy revealed small cell carcinoma.CT = computed tomography, EBUS = endobronchial ultrasound, RP-EBUS = radial probe EBUS.


Reference

1. Ahn JH. An update on the role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of pulmonary disease. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020; 37(4):253–261. PMID: 32891075.
Article
2. Anantham D, Koh MS, Ernst A. Endobronchial ultrasound. Respir Med. 2009; 103(10):1406–1414. PMID: 19447014.
Article
3. Kurimoto N, Miyazawa T, Okimasa S, Maeda A, Oiwa H, Miyazu Y, et al. Endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath increases the ability to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions endoscopically. Chest. 2004; 126(3):959–965. PMID: 15364779.
Article
4. Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, Irving LB. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2011; 37(4):902–910. PMID: 20693253.
Article
5. Ali MS, Trick W, Mba BI, Mohananey D, Sethi J, Musani AI. Radial endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respirology. 2017; 22(3):443–453. PMID: 28177181.
Article
6. Chen CH, Cheng WC, Wu BR, Chen CY, Chen WC, Hsia TC, et al. Improved diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy in peripheral pulmonary lesions: combination of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound and rapid on-site evaluation. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7(Suppl 4):S418–S425. PMID: 26807290.
7. Moon SM, Choe J, Jeong BH, Um SW, Kim H, Kwon OJ, et al. Diagnostic performance of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound without a guide-sheath and the feasibility of molecular analysis. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2019; 82(4):319–327. PMID: 31172704.
Article
8. Asano F, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ. Virtual bronchoscopic navigation for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Respiration. 2014; 88(5):430–440. PMID: 25402610.
Article
9. Minezawa T, Okamura T, Yatsuya H, Yamamoto N, Morikawa S, Yamaguchi T, et al. Bronchus sign on thin-section computed tomography is a powerful predictive factor for successful transbronchial biopsy using endobronchial ultrasound with a guide sheath for small peripheral lung lesions: a retrospective observational study. BMC Med Imaging. 2015; 15(1):21. PMID: 26092497.
Article
10. Tay JH, Irving L, Antippa P, Steinfort DP. Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound: factors influencing visualization yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions. Respirology. 2013; 18(1):185–190. PMID: 23035636.
Article
11. Evison M, Crosbie PA, Morris J, Martin J, Barber PV, Booton R. Can computed tomography characteristics predict outcomes in patients undergoing radial endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy of peripheral lung lesions? J Thorac Oncol. 2014; 9(9):1393–1397. PMID: 25122434.
Article
12. Park S, Yoon HY, Han Y, Wang KS, Park SY, Ryu YJ, et al. Diagnostic yield of additional conventional transbronchial lung biopsy following radial endobronchial ultrasound lung biopsy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Thorac Cancer. 2020; 11(6):1639–1646. PMID: 32342673.
Article
13. Ali MS, Sethi J, Taneja A, Musani A, Maldonado F. Computed tomography bronchus sign and the diagnostic yield of guided bronchoscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018; 15(8):978–987. PMID: 29877715.
Article
14. Chen AC, Loiselle A, Zhou L, Baty J, Misselhorn D. Localization of peripheral pulmonary lesions using a method of computed tomography-anatomic correlation and radial probe endobronchial ultrasound confirmation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 13(9):1586–1592. PMID: 27388116.
Article
15. Lee KM, Lee G, Kim A, Mok J, Lee JW, Jeong YJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound using a guide sheath for diagnosis of peripheral lung lesions in patients with pulmonary emphysema. Respir Res. 2019; 20(1):177. PMID: 31387600.
Article
16. Good WR, Christensen PM, Herath S, Dawkins P, Yap E. Radial-probe endobronchial ultrasound outcomes in the investigation of peripheral pulmonary lesions: a New Zealand perspective. Intern Med J. 2018; 48(12):1481–1487. PMID: 30091278.
Article
17. Zhang Q, Zhang S, Xu X, Xu Q, Zhou J. Value of radial probe endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy and computer tomography-guided transthoracic needle aspiration in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(34):e7843. PMID: 28834894.
Article
18. Huang CT, Ho CC, Tsai YJ, Yu CJ, Yang PC. Factors influencing visibility and diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy using endobronchial ultrasound in peripheral pulmonary lesions. Respirology. 2009; 14(6):859–864. PMID: 19703067.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr