Arch Hand Microsurg.  2021 Jun;26(2):118-124. 10.12790/ahm.21.0081.

Reconstruction of the First Web Space Using the Wide-Second Dorsal Metacarpal Artery Perforator Flap

Affiliations
  • 1W Institute for Hand and Reconstructive Microsurgery, W General Hospital, Daegu, Korea

Abstract

Purpose
This study evaluated the functional and aesthetic outcomes of a wide-second dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of the first web space of the hand. This flap sets the proximal edge of the extensor retinaculum as the distal limit.
Methods
We measured the preoperative and postoperative angles of the first web space and assessed the quality of the donor site scar in eight patients.
Results
The average flap size was 5.5 × 2.8 cm (range, 5.0 × 1.5 cm to 5.0 × 6.0 cm), and all flaps survived completely. The mean postoperative angle was 53°. The mean Vancouver Scar Scale score of the donor site was 4 points, and the patients had near-normal thickness and vascularity values. There was no distortion of the scar, and patients were satisfied with the scar appearance of the donor site.
Conclusion
The wide-second dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap is a useful technique to reconstruct large defects of the first web space. It is easy to raise, thin, and pliable, and has excellent color and tissue matching.

Keyword

Hand injuries; Contracture release; Perforator flap; Reconstructive surgical procedures

Figure

  • Fig. 1. The illustration of wide-second dorsal metacarpal artery (DMA) perforator flap anatomy. Illustration shows the selected perforator (black asterisk) marked at the metacarpal neck area, representing the pivot point. The proximal edge of the extensor retinaculum is the distal limit of the flap.

  • Fig. 2. (A) Preoperative soft tissue defect of the first web space after a crush injury to the left hand. (B) A 5.0 × 4.0-cm rectangular wide-second dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap with the proximal edge of the extensor retinaculum as the distal limit. (C) The flap is elevated and the pedicle is identified. (D) Immediate postoperative view. (E) Three months after surgery. The postoperative angle of the first web space was 85° and the Vancouver Scar Scale score was 3 points (pigmentation 2, vascularity 0, pliability 1, and height 0).

  • Fig. 3. (A) Preoperative contracture of the first web space after a crush injury to the right hand. (B) A 5.0 × 1.5 cm wide-second dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap with the proximal edge of the extensor retinaculum as the distal limit. (C) The flap is elevated and the pedicle is identified. (D) Immediate postoperative view. (E) Twenty-two months after surgery. The postoperative angle of the first web space was 46° and the Vancouver Scar Scale score was 3 points.


Reference

1. Rondinelli RD, Katz RT, Mayer TG, et al. Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment. 6th ed. Chicago: American Medical Association;2008. p. 408–92.
2. Jensen CB, Rayan GM, Davidson R. First web space contracture and hand function. J Hand Surg Am. 1993; 18:516–20.
Article
3. Flynn JE. Adduction contracture of the thumb. N Engl J Med. 1956; 254:677–86.
Article
4. Gong X, Lu LJ. Reconstruction of severe contracture of the first web space using the reverse posterior interosseous artery flap. J Trauma. 2011; 71:1745–9.
Article
5. Grishkevich VM. First web space post-burn contracture types: contracture elimination methods. Burns. 2011; 37:338–47.
Article
6. Woo SH, Choi BC, Oh SJ, Seul JH. Classification of the first web space free flap of the foot and its applications in reconstruction of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 103:508–17.
Article
7. Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995; 16:535–8.
Article
8. Sullivan T, Smith J, Kermode J, McIver E, Courtemanche DJ. Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1990; 11:256–60.
Article
9. Fritsch EP. Reconstructive surgery in leprosy. Bristol: John Wright & Sons;1971. p. 192.
10. Meyer RD, Gould JS, Nicholson B. Revision of the first web space: technics and results. South Med J. 1981; 74:1204–8.
11. Coombs CJ, Thomas DJ. The Manta Ray flap: a technique for first web space release. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2010; 14:41–5.
Article
12. Quaba AA, Davison PM. The distally-based dorsal hand flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1990; 43:28–39.
Article
13. Sebastin SJ, Mendoza RT, Chong AK, et al. Application of the dorsal metacarpal artery perforator flap for resurfacing soft-tissue defects proximal to the fingertip. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128:166e–178e.
Article
14. de Rezende MR, Mattar Júnior R, Cho AB, Hasegawa OH, Ribak S. Anatomic study of the dorsal arterial system of the hand. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2004; 59:71–6.
15. Earley MJ. The arterial supply of the thumb, first web and index finger and its surgical application. J Hand Surg Br. 1986; 11:163–74.
Article
16. Nanno M, Kodera N, Tomori Y, Hagiwara Y, Takai S. Color Doppler ultrasound assessment for identifying perforator arteries of the second dorsal metacarpal flap. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017; 25:2309499016684744.
Article
17. Olave E, Prates JC, Gabrielli C, Mandiola E. Perforating branches: important contribution to the formation of the dorsal metacarpal arteries. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998; 32:221–7.
Article
18. Bonola A, Fiocchi R. Cross-arm double flap in the repair of severe adduction contracture of the thumb. Hand. 1975; 7:287–90.
Article
19. McGregor IA, Jackson IT. The groin flap. Br J Plast Surg. 1972; 25:3–16.
Article
20. Nassif TM, Vidal L, Bovet JL, Baudet J. The parascapular flap: a new cutaneous microsurgical free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1982; 69:591–600.
21. Chen CC, Chang HH, Tang YB, Cheng NC. Combined first dorsal metacarpal artery flap and dorsal transposition flap for correction of extensive first web space contracture: a case report and literature review. Ann Plast Surg. 2011; 67:364–6.
22. Das De S, Sebastin SJ. Considerations in flap selection for soft tissue defects of the hand. Clin Plast Surg. 2019; 46:393–406.
Article
23. Summers BK, Siegle RJ. Facial cutaneous reconstructive surgery: general aesthetic principles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1993; 29(5 Pt 1):669–81.
Article
24. Black S, Macdonald-McMillan B, Mallett X. The incidence of scarring on the dorsum of the hand. Int J Legal Med. 2014; 128:545–53.
Article
25. Johnson SP, Sebastin SJ, Rehim SA, Chung KC. The importance of hand appearance as a patient-reported outcome in hand surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015; 3:e552.
Article
26. Mohammadi AA, Foroutan A, Mohammadi S, Zardosht M. Evaluation of patients’ satisfaction and functional outcome of dorsal hand unit reconstruction in burn patients in Shiraz, Southern Iran. J Burn Care Res. 2018; 39:572–9.
Article
27. Wang P, Zhou Z, Dong Q, Jiang B, Zhao J. Reverse second and third dorsal metacarpal artery fasciocutaneous flaps for repair of distal- and middle-segment finger soft tissue defects. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2011; 27:495–502.
Article
28. Vercelli S, Ferriero G, Sartorio F, Stissi V, Franchignoni F. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil. 2009; 31:2055–63.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr