Healthc Inform Res.  2021 Apr;27(2):110-115. 10.4258/hir.2021.27.2.110.

Popularization of Medical Information

• Lee J
• Koh J
• Kim JY

• KMID: 2515913
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2021.27.2.110

Abstract

Objectives
Despite the popularization of technology and the high penetration rate of smartphones and mobile devices, differences exist in the accessibility, utilization capabilities, and quality of technology depending on users’ characteristics. Since these discrepancies can threaten health information equity, popularization of medical information is essential. This review article examines domestic and international cases of popularization of medical information, and discusses the related issues, expectations, and practical measures to achieve the popularization of medical information.
Methods
In this study, medical information was categorized as Electronic Health Records/Electronic Medical Records (EHR/EMRs; hospital-driven medical information), personal health records (PHRs; user-driven medical information), and patient-generated health data (PGHD; user-generated medical information [outside hospitals]). This article reviewed the domestic and international use status, acceptance rates, and use cases for each type of medical information. Issues and expectations about policies and cases related to the popularization of medical information were also described, and finally, practical measures to accomplish the popularization of medical information were discussed.
Results
To achieve the popularization of medical information, the following measures should be considered: engaging health consumers to participate in the early stages of information production, cultivating digital literacy, producing easy-to-use and interesting medical content, visualizing health information, and creating a medical thesaurus.
Conclusions
Healthcare providers should make regular efforts to popularize medical information. The popularization of medical information is an essential process to achieve health equity and digital health equity.

Keyword

Personal Health Records; Electronic Health Records; Consumer Health Informatics; Health Equity; Information Literacy

Reference

References

1. World Health Organization. Social determinants of health: health equity [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization;c2021. [cited at 2021 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/social-determinants-of-health#tab=tab_3 .

2. Lee J. The impact of health information technology on disparity of process of care. Int J Equity Health. 2015; 14:34.

3. National Information Society Agency. The report on the Digital Divide 2018 [Internet]. Daegu, Korea: National Information Society Agency;2019. [cited at 2021 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.nia.or.kr/site/nia_kor/ex/bbs/List.do?cbIdx=81623 .

4. Markets and Markets. Hospital EMR systems market by component (software, services, hardware), delivery mode (cloud, on-premise), type (specialty EMR), hospital size (small, large hospitals) and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific) - Global Forecast to 2025 [Internet]. Northbrook (IL): Markets and Markets;2021. [cited at 2021 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/EMR-market-253.html .

5. IRS Global. The fourth industrial revolution, convergence trends and market prospects of ICT new technologies in digital healthcare. Incheon, Korea: IRS Global Publishing Division;2017.

6. Ministry of SMEs and Startups. Technology roadmap for SME 2018–2020 medical service equipment [Internet]. Daejeon, Korea: Ministry of SMEs and Startups;2018. [cited at 2021 Apr 20]. Available from: https://www.smtech.go.kr/front/ifg/tr/tecRoadmap_detail.do?searchCondition=0&searchKeyword=&bitmSeq=145380&pageIndex=3 .

7. Jeong GS, An SJ. Trends in standards and testing certification technologies: personal health record (PHR) industry, standards and policy trends. TTA J. 2016; 164:65–9.

8. Jeon JO. Current status and development of electronic medical records introduction in Korea. HIRA Policy Trends. 2018; 12(3):7–16.

9. Chen M, Yang J, Zhou J, Hao Y, Zhang J, Youn CH. 5G-smart diabetes: toward personalized diabetes diagnosis with healthcare big data clouds. IEEE Commun Mag. 2018; 56(4):16–23.

10. Ashrafzadeh S, Hamdy O. Patient-driven diabetes care of the future in the technology era. Cell Metab. 2019; 29(3):564–75.

11. Keum DH, Kim SK, Koo J, Lee GH, Jeon C, Mok JW, et al. Wireless smart contact lens for diabetic diagnosis and therapy. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(17):eaba3252.

12. Ku M, Kim J, Won JE, Kang W, Park YG, Park J, et al. Smart, soft contact lens for wireless immunosensing of cortisol. Sci Adv. 2020; 6(28):eabb2891.

13. Park JH, Ahn JD, Park GJ. Service design. Paju, Korea: DaeWang Sa;2017.

14. Lee HY, Lee JS, Kim J. Prerequisites for effective implementation of telemedicine: focusing on current situations in Korea. Healthc Inform Res. 2015; 21(4):251–4.

15. Kim JY. Contactless healthcare. Healthc Inform Res. 2020; 26(4):253–4.

16. Seo IG. A study on user experience-oriented self-managing blood pressure device interface design [thesis]. Gimhae, Korea: Graduate School of U Design, Inje University;2013.