Korean J Radiol.  2021 Apr;22(4):577-583. 10.3348/kjr.2020.0989.

Evaluation of Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Performed with and without Prophylactic Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in Patients with Traumatic Aortic Injury

• Bae M
• Jeon CH
• Kwon H
• Kim JH
• Choi SU
• Song S

• KMID: 2514623
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0989

Abstract

Objective
To report the authors’ experience in performing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for zone 2 lesions after traumatic aortic injury (TAI).
Materials and Methods
This retrospective review included 10 patients who underwent zone 2 TEVAR after identification of aortic isthmus injury by CT angiography (CTA) upon arrival at the emergency room of a regional trauma center from 2016 to 2019. Patients were classified into two groups: those who underwent left subclavian artery (LSA) embolization concurrently with the main TEVAR procedure, and those in whom LSA embolization was not performed during the main procedure, but was planned as a bailout treatment if type II endoleak was noted on follow-up CTA images. Pre-procedural and procedurerelated factors and post-procedure prognosis were compared between the groups.
Results
There were no differences in pre-procedural factors, occurrence of endoleaks, and post-procedure prognosis (including mortality) between patients in the two groups. The duration of the procedure was shorter in the non-LSA embolization group (61 minutes vs. 27 minutes, p = 0.012). During follow-up, type II endoleak did not occur in either group.
Conclusion
Delaying preventative LSA embolization until stabilization of the patient would be desirable when performing zone 2 TEVAR for TAI, in the absence of endoleak on the completion aortography image taken after complete deployment of the stent graft.

Keyword

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair; Traumatic aortic injury; Left subclavian artery; Embolization; Type II endoleak