Clin Endosc.  2021 Mar;54(2):145-146. 10.5946/ce.2021.077.

The Value of Risk Scores to Predict Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

• Lau JYw

• KMID: 2514166
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2021.077

Reference

1. Chang Arunchai, Ouejiaraphant C, Akarapatima K, Rattanasupa A, Prachayakul V. Prospective comparison of the AIMS65 score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clin Endosc. 2021; 54:211–221.

2. Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, et al. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2017; 356:i6432.

3. Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers E, et al. Management of novariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: guideline recommendations from the international consensus group. Ann Intern Med. 2019; 171:805–822.

4. Siau K, Hearnshaw S, Stanley AJ, et al. British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)-led multisociety consensus care bundle for the early clinical management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020; 11:311–323.

5. Moon KGM, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162:W1–W73.

6. Shung DK, Au B, Taylor RA, et al. Validation of a machine learning model that outperforms clinical risk scoring systems for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterology. 2020; 158:160–167.