J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2021 Mar;64(2):261-270. 10.3340/jkns.2020.0149.

Clinical Significance of Decompressive Craniectomy Surface Area and Side

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

Abstract


Objective
: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) can partially remove the unyielding skull vault and make affordable space for the expansion of swelling brain contents. The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcome according to DC surface area (DC area) and side.
Methods
: A total of 324 patients underwent different surgical methods (unilateral DC, 212 cases and bilateral DC, 112 cases) were included in this retrospective analysis. Their mean age was 53.4±16.6 years (median, 54 years). Neurological outcome (Glasgow outcome scale), ventricular intracranial pressure (ICP), and midline shift change (preoperative minus postoperative) were compared according to surgical methods and total DC area, DC surface removal rate (DC%) and side.
Results
: DC surgery was effective for ICP decrease (32.3±16.7 mmHg vs. 19.2±13.4 mmHg, p<0.001) and midline shift change (12.5±7.6 mm vs. 7.8±6.9 mm, p<0.001). The bilateral DC group showed larger total DC area (125.1±27.8 cm2 for unilateral vs. 198.2±43.0 cm2 for bilateral, p<0.001). Clinical outcomes were nonsignificant according to surgical side (favorable outcome, p=0.173 and mortality, p=0.470), significantly better when total DC area was over 160 cm2 and DC% was 46% (p=0.020 and p=0.037, respectively).
Conclusion
: DC surgery is effective in decrease the elevated ICP, decrease the midline shift and improve the clinical outcome in massive brain swelling patient. Total DC area and removal rate was larger in bilateral DC than unilateral DC but clinical outcome was not influenced by DC side. DC area more than 160 cm2 and DC surface removal rate more than 46% were more important than DC side.

Keyword

Skull; Decompressive craniectomy; Intracranial pressure; Prognosis; Craniectomy size

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Flow sheet of treatment protocol. SAH : subarachnoid hemorrhage, ICH : intracerebral hemorrhage, MI : major infarction, TBI : traumatic brain injury, iGCS : initial Glasgow coma scale, iICP : intracranial pressure after ventricular puncture, CT : computed tomography, DC : decompressive craniectomy.

  • Fig. 2. The simple AC methods for calculating DC area. A : A was the longest length of craniectomy on the axial slices. B : C was the longest length of craniectomy on the coronal slice. C : C could be calculated the number of axial cuts (the number of blue box) by craniectomy and slice thickness (red box, 5 mm). DC : decompressive craniectomy.


Reference

References

1. Andrews PJ, Sinclair HL, Rodriguez A, Harris BA, Battison CG, Rhodes JK, et al. Hypothermia for intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 373:2403–2412. 2015.
Article
2. Bor-Seng-Shu E, Figueiredo EG, Amorim RL, Teixeira MJ, Valbuza JS, de Oliveira MM, et al. Decompressive craniectomy: a meta-analysis of influences on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 117:589–596. 2012.
Article
3. Bor-Seng-Shu E, Figueiredo EG, Fonoff ET, Fujimoto Y, Panerai RB, Teixeira MJ. Decompressive craniectomy and head injury: brain morphometry, ICP, cerebral hemodynamics, cerebral microvascular reactivity, and neurochemistry. Neurosurg Rev. 36:361–370. 2013.
Article
4. Bösel J, Zweckberger K, Hacke W. Haemorrhage and hemicraniectomy: refining surgery for stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 28:16–22. 2015.
5. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Congress of Neurological Surgeons. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 24 Suppl 1:S1–S106. 2007.
6. Brain Trauma Foundation; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Guidelines for the management of severe head injury. J Neurotrauma. 13:641–734. 1996.
7. Bratton SL, Chestnut RM, Ghajar J, McConnell Hammond FF, Harris OA, Hartl R, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VIII. Intracranial pressure thresholds. J Neurotrauma 24 Suppl. 1:S55–S58. 2007.
8. Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, et al. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery. 80:6–15. 2017.
Article
9. Clifton GL, Allen S, Barrodale P, Plenger P, Berry J, Koch S, et al. A phase II study of moderate hypothermia in severe brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 10:263–271. discussion 273. 1993.
Article
10. Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D'Urso P, et al. Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 364:1493–1502. 2011.
Article
11. El Ahmadieh TY, Adel JG, El Tecle NE, Daou MR, Aoun SG, Nanney AD 3rd, et al. Surgical treatment of elevated intracranial pressure: decompressive craniectomy and intracranial pressure monitoring. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 24:375–391. 2013.
12. Ferro JM, Crassard I, Coutinho JM, Canhão P, Barinagarrementeria F, Cucchiara B, et al. Decompressive surgery in cerebrovenous thrombosis: a multicenter registry and a systematic review of individual patient data. Stroke. 42:2825–2831. 2011.
13. Frank JI, Schumm LP, Wroblewski K, Chyatte D, Rosengart AJ, Kordeck C, et al. Hemicraniectomy and durotomy upon deterioration from infarction-related swelling trial: randomized pilot clinical trial. Stroke. 45:781–787. 2014.
Article
14. Gerber LM, Chiu YL, Carney N, Härtl R, Ghajar J. Marked reduction in mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 119:1583–1590. 2013.
Article
15. Güresir E, Schuss P, Seifert V, Vatter H. Decompressive craniectomy in children: single-center series and systematic review. Neurosurgery. 70:881–888. discussion 888-889. 2012.
16. Ho MY, Tseng WL, Xiao F. Estimation of the craniectomy surface area by using postoperative images. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2018:5237693. 2018.
Article
17. Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A, Amelink GJ, van Gijn J, van der Worp HB, et al. Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the hemicraniectomy after middle cerebral artery infarction with life-threatening edema trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 8:326–333. 2009.
Article
18. Honeybul S, Ho KM. The current role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of neurological emergencies. Brain Inj. 27:979–991. 2013.
Article
19. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M, Timothy J, et al. Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med. 375:1119–1130. 2016.
Article
20. Jiang JY, Xu W, Li WP, Xu WH, Zhang J, Bao YH, et al. Efficacy of standard trauma craniectomy for refractory intracranial hypertension with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled study. J Neurotrauma. 22:623–628. 2005.
Article
21. Jüttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P, Unterberg A, Hennerici M, Woitzik J, et al. Decompressive surgery for the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery (DESTINY): a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke. 38:2518–2525. 2007.
Article
22. Kakar V, Nagaria J, John Kirkpatrick P. The current status of decompressive craniectomy. Br J Neurosurg. 23:147–157. 2009.
Article
23. Kenning TJ, Gooch MR, Gandhi RH, Shaikh MP, Boulos AS, German JW. Cranial decompression for the treatment of malignant intracranial hypertension after ischemic cerebral infarction: decompressive craniectomy and hinge craniotomy. J Neurosurg. 116:1289–1298. 2012.
Article
24. Kim KT, Park JK, Kang SG, Cho KS, Yoo DS, Jang DK, et al. Comparison of the effect of decompressive craniectomy on different neurosurgical diseases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 151:21–30. 2009.
Article
25. Lang SS, Kofke WA, Stiefel MF. Monitoring and intraoperative management of elevated intracranial pressure and decompressive craniectomy. Anesthesiol Clin. 30:289–310. 2012.
Article
26. Lazaridis C, Czosnyka M. Cerebral blood flow, brain tissue oxygen, and metabolic effects of decompressive craniectomy. Neurocrit Care. 16:478–484. 2012.
Article
27. Lazaridis C, DeSantis SM, Vandergrift AW, Krishna V. Cerebral blood flow velocity changes and the value of the pulsatility index post decompressive craniectomy. J Clin Neurosci. 19:1052–1054. 2012.
Article
28. Marshall LF, Smith RW, Shapiro HM. The outcome with aggressive treatment in severe head injuries. Part I: the significance of intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurosurg. 50:20–25. 1979.
29. Missori P, Morselli C, Domenicucci M, Paolini S, Peschillo S, Scapeccia M, et al. Measurement of bone flap surface area and midline shift to predict overall survival after decompressive craniectomy. World Neurosurg. 96:11–14. 2016.
Article
30. Morgalla MH, Will BE, Roser F, Tatagiba M. Do long-term results justify decompressive craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg. 109:685–690. 2008.
Article
31. Neugebauer H, Fiss I, Pinczolits A, Hecht N, Witsch J, Dengler NF, et al. Large size hemicraniectomy reduces early herniation in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Cerebrovasc Dis. 41:283–290. 2016.
Article
32. Rahme R, Zuccarello M, Kleindorfer D, Adeoye OM, Ringer AJ. Decompressive hemicraniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery territory infarction: is life worth living? J Neurosurg. 117:749–754. 2012.
Article
33. Rosenfeld JV, Maas AI, Bragge P, Morganti-Kossmann MC, Manley GT, Gruen RL. Early management of severe traumatic brain injury. Lancet. 380:1088–1098. 2012.
Article
34. Saul TG, Ducker TB. Effect of intracranial pressure monitoring and aggressive treatment on mortality in severe head injury. J Neurosurg. 56:498–503. 1982.
Article
35. Schirmer CM, Hoit DA, Malek AM. Decompressive hemicraniectomy for the treatment of intractable intracranial hypertension after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 38:987–992. 2007.
Article
36. The Brain Trauma Foundation; The American Association of Neurological Surgeons; The Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care. Intracranial pressure treatment threshold. J Neurotrauma. 17:493–495. 2000.
37. Ucar T, Akyuz M, Kazan S, Tuncer R. Role of decompressive surgery in the management of severe head injuries: prognostic factors and patient selection. J Neurotrauma. 22:1311–1318. 2005.
Article
38. Vahedi K, Vicaut E, Mateo J, Kurtz A, Orabi M, Guichard JP, et al. Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL trial). Stroke. 38:2506–2517. 2007.
Article
39. Won YD, Yoo DS, Kim KT, Kang SG, Lee SB, Kim DS, et al. Cranioplasty effect on the cerebral hemodynamics and cardiac function. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 102:15–20. 2008.
Article
40. Xiao B, Wu FF, Zhang H, Ma YB. A randomized study of urgent computed tomography-based hematoma puncture and aspiration in the emergency department and subsequent evacuation using craniectomy versus craniectomy only. J Neurosurg. 117:566–573. 2012.
Article
41. Yoo DS, Kim DS, Cho KS, Huh PW, Park CK, Kang JK. Ventricular pressure monitoring during bilateral decompression with dural expansion. J Neurosurg. 91:953–959. 1999.
Article
42. Zhao J, Su YY, Zhang Y, Zhang YZ, Zhao R, Wang L, et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarct: a randomized controlled trial enrolling patients up to 80 years old. Neurocrit Care. 17:161–171. 2012.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKNS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr