Korean Circ J.  2021 Mar;51(3):232-234. 10.4070/kcj.2020.0547.

The Lower, The Better? Think Beyond the Gradient after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Small Annulus

• Lee CW
• Sung SH

• KMID: 2513520
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2020.0547

Reference

1. Freitas-Ferraz AB, Tirado-Conte G, Dagenais F, et al. Aortic stenosis and small aortic annulus. Circulation. 2019; 139:2685–2702. PMID: 31157994.

2. Pibarot P, Weissman NJ, Stewart WJ, et al. Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64:1323–1334. PMID: 25257633.

3. Thyregod HGH, Ihlemann N, Jørgensen TH, et al. Five-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes from the nordic aortic valve intervention (NOTION) randomized clinical trial in lower surgical risk patients. Circulation. 2019; [Epub ahead of print].

4. Lee YJ, Lee SJ, Hong SJ, et al. Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve replacement between self-expanding versus balloon-expandable valves in patients with small aortic annulus. Korean Circ J. 2021; 51:222–231.

5. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation. 1990; 82:1467–1475. PMID: 2401075.

6. Aalaei-Andabili SH, Park KE, Choi CY, et al. Relationship between invasive and echocardiographic transvalvular gradients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiol Ther. 2020; 9:201–206. PMID: 31970689.

7. Hase H, Yoshijima N, Yanagisawa R, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with Evolut R versus Sapien 3 in Japanese patients with a small aortic annulus: the OCEAN-TAVI registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; [Epub ahead of print].

8. Makkar RR, Cheng W, Waksman R, et al. Self-expanding intra-annular versus commercially available transcatheter heart valves in high and extreme risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (PORTICO IDE): a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020; 396:669–683. PMID: 32593323.

9. Kim SH, Kim HJ, Kim JB, et al. Supra-annular versus intra-annular prostheses in aortic valve replacement: impact on haemodynamics and clinical outcomes. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019; 28:58–64. PMID: 30010890.