Endocrinol Metab.  2021 Feb;36(1):60-69. 10.3803/EnM.2020.848.

Romosozumab in Postmenopausal Korean Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Efficacy and Safety Study

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Ajou University Hospital, Suwon, Korea
  • 3Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
  • 5Division of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
  • 6Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 7Department of Rehabilitation, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
  • 8Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
  • 9Amgen Korea Limited, Seoul, Korea
  • 10Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Abstract

Background
This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of 6-month treatment with romosozumab in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Methods
Sixty-seven postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (bone mineral density [BMD] T-scores ≤–2.5 at the lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck) were randomized (1:1) to receive monthly subcutaneous injections of romosozumab (210 mg; n=34) or placebo (n=33) for 6 months.
Results
At month 6, the difference in the least square (LS) mean percent change from baseline in lumbar spine BMD (primary efficacy endpoint) between the romosozumab (9.5%) and placebo (–0.1%) groups was significant (9.6%; 95% confidence interval, 7.6 to 11.5; P<0.001). The difference in the LS mean percent change from baseline was also significant for total hip and femoral neck BMD (secondary efficacy endpoints). After treatment with romosozumab, the percent change from baseline in procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide transiently increased at months 1 and 3, while that in C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen showed a sustained decrease. No events of cancer, hypocalcemia, injection site reaction, positively adjudicated atypical femoral fracture or osteonecrosis of the jaw, or positively adjudicated serious cardiovascular adverse events were observed. At month 9, 17.6% and 2.9% of patients in the romosozumab group developed binding and neutralizing antibodies, respectively.
Conclusion
Treatment with romosozumab for 6 months was well tolerated and significantly increased lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD compared with placebo in Korean postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02791516).

Keyword

Bone density; Bone turnover markers; Korea; Randomized controlled trial; Romosozumab

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Study design. IP, investigational product; D, day; M, month; SC, subcutaneous; QM, once monthly.

  • Fig. 2 Patient disposition. BMD, bone mineral density; BTM, bone turnover marker.

  • Fig. 3 Percent change (least square mean and 95% confidence interval) from baseline in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at month 6.

  • Fig. 4 Median (interquartile range) percent change from baseline in (A) procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and (B) serum C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) by visit. SC, subcutaneous; QM, once monthly.


Reference

1. Ji MX, Yu Q. Primary osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2015; 1:9–13.
Article
2. Park EJ, Joo IW, Jang MJ, Kim YT, Oh K, Oh HJ. Prevalence of osteoporosis in the Korean population based on Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2008–2011. Yonsei Med J. 2014; 55:1049–57.
Article
3. Park C, Ha YC, Jang S, Jang S, Yoon HK, Lee YK. The incidence and residual lifetime risk of osteoporosis-related fractures in Korea. J Bone Miner Metab. 2011; 29:744–51.
Article
4. Papapoulos S, Makras P. Selection of antiresorptive or anabolic treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008; 4:514–23.
Article
5. Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019; 393:364–76.
Article
6. Lim SY, Bolster MB. Profile of romosozumab and its potential in the management of osteoporosis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2017; 11:1221–31.
Article
7. Ke HZ, Richards WG, Li X, Ominsky MS. Sclerostin and Dickkopf-1 as therapeutic targets in bone diseases. Endocr Rev. 2012; 33:747–83.
Article
8. Ominsky MS, Niu QT, Li C, Li X, Ke HZ. Tissue-level mechanisms responsible for the increase in bone formation and bone volume by sclerostin antibody. J Bone Miner Res. 2014; 29:1424–30.
Article
9. Cosman F, Crittenden DB, Adachi JD, Binkley N, Czerwinski E, Ferrari S, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375:1532–43.
Article
10. Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T, et al. Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377:1417–27.
Article
11. Langdahl BL, Libanati C, Crittenden DB, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Daizadeh NS, et al. Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017; 390:1585–94.
Article
12. Lewiecki EM, Blicharski T, Goemaere S, Lippuner K, Meisner PD, Miller PD, et al. A phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of romosozumab in men with osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 103:3183–93.
Article
13. Amgen Korea Limited. Evenity™ Inj. Pre-filled Syringe prescribing information [Internet]. Seoul: Amgen;2019. [cited 2020 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.amgen.co.kr/en-kr/products/ .
14. McClung MR, Grauer A, Boonen S, Bolognese MA, Brown JP, Diez-Perez A, et al. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:412–20.
Article
15. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry drug-induced liver injury: premarketing clinical evaluation July 2009 [Internet]. White Oak: FDA;2009. [cited 2020 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/drug-induced-liver-injury-premarketing-clinical-evaluation .
16. Park SY, Ahn SH, Yoo JI, Chung YJ, Jeon YK, Yoon BH, et al. Position statement on the use of bone turnover markers for osteoporosis treatment. J Bone Metab. 2019; 26:213–24.
Article
17. Amgen Inc. EVENITY™ (romosozumab-aqqg) injection, for subcutaneous use prescribing information [Internet]. White Oak: FDA;2019. [cited 2020 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/761062s000lbl.pdf .
18. Miyauchi A, Dinavahi RV, Crittenden DB, Yang W, Maddox JC, Hamaya E, et al. Increased bone mineral density for 1 year of romosozumab, vs placebo, followed by 2 years of denosumab in the Japanese subgroup of the pivotal FRAME trial and extension. Arch Osteoporos. 2019; 14:59.
Full Text Links
  • ENM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr