Clin Exp Pediatr.  2021 Mar;64(3):130-135. 10.3345/cep.2020.00486.

Significance of the tethered maxillary frenulum: a questionnaire-based observational cohort study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Siaal Family Medicine and Primary Care Research Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, BeerSheva, Israel
  • 2Elon Moreh Clinic, Clalit Health Services – Shomron district, Lev Shomron, Israel
  • 3Community Pediatric Service, Kedumim Family Health Center, Clalit Health Services –Shomron district, Lev Shomron, Israel
  • 4Division of Planning and Strategy, Department of Research of Data, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • 5Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • 6Family Health Center, Clalit Health Services, Jerusalem district, Jerusalem, Israel

Abstract

Background
The clinical significance of lip-tie, or a tethered maxillary frenulum, remains under debate. Clinicians and parents are often perplexed when deciding whether procedures available to relieve a seemingly tight or severe maxillary frenulum are needed. Purpose: No previous studies have assessed the consequences of not subjecting a tethered maxillary frenulum in newborns to surgical intervention. This study aimed to contribute the first prospective trial on this topic with a relatively extended followup of these newborn infants.
Methods
This prospective observational questionnaire-based cohort trial was performed in a community setting and aimed to determine whether lip-tie is associated with an increased likelihood of eventual feeding or oral disorders.
Results
The convenience sample comprised of 61 consecutively arriving infants with concomitant tethered frenula who were treated at the clinic for various reasons. This cohort was compared with a random sample of 66 age-matched children for a mean follow-up period of 6.42 years. Infants undergoing oropharyngeal procedures were excluded. Awareness of a deviation in oral structures was reported by 18% of the study group versus 0% of the controls. Mothers participating in the study group (24.6%) less frequently recalled painful nipples or discomfort during breastfeeding than those in the control group (47.0%) (P<0.01). There were no intergroup differences in other types of feeding difficulty, dental hygiene, pronunciation, or speech development.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that a tethered labial frenulum is not associated with an increase in breastfeeding disturbances or oral disorders. These data encourage clinicians to question the need to intervene in cases of tethered maxillary frenula.

Keyword

Breastfeeding, Frenulum, Infant welfare, Oral pathology, Tethered maxillary frenulum
Full Text Links
  • CEP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr