Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.  2021 Feb;25(1):97-101. 10.14701/ahbps.2021.25.1.97.

Enhanced recovery after hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: A single-center case control study

Affiliations
  • 1Liver Transplant and Research Center, Imam Khomeni Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • 2Department of General Surgery, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims
The aim of this study was to find the safety and effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in patients who undergo hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgeries and its association with the postoperative complications and survival rate of the patients.
Methods
This study was conducted on patients who underwent HPB surgeries in Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Iran from 2018 to 2020. Patients who underwent surgery after from 2019 to February 2020 considered as the ERAS group (n=47) in which ERAS was implemented postoperatively including removing nasogastric tube and initiating surgical diet at 6 hours post operation, and removing intraabdominal drains and Foley catheter at postoperative day one. Other patients (n=43) were considered as the control group in which conventional postoperative care was implemented.
Results
Ninety patients with the mean age of 47.3±13.3 yrs/old (range= 17-76) including 39 females were enrolled into the study. There were no significant differences between the demographic and preoperative comorbidities between the two groups. Pain severity of the patients in the ERAS group was significantly lower than the control group (visual analogue scales of 3.4±0.77 vs. 4.47±0.88, p<0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the other postoperative data between the two groups. One patient in each group died during hospitalization period due to myocardial infarction.
Conclusions
ERAS may be safe and effective in patients who undergo HPB surgery and may be associated with less severe postoperative pain.

Keyword

Enhanced recovery after surgery; Hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery; Postoperative pain

Reference

1. Kehlet H. 1997; Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 78:606–617. DOI: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606. PMID: 9175983.
Article
2. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. 2008; Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg. 248:189–198. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31817f2c1a. PMID: 18650627.
Article
3. Azhar RA, Bochner B, Catto J, Goh AC, Kelly J, Patel HD, et al. 2016; Enhanced recovery after urological surgery: a contemporary systematic review of outcomes, key elements, and research needs. Eur Urol. 70:176–187. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.051. PMID: 26970912. PMCID: PMC5514421.
Article
4. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, et al. 2012; Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERASⓇ) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 31:783–800. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013. PMID: 23099039.
Article
5. Pisarska M, Małczak P, Major P, Wysocki M, Budzyński A, Pędziwiatr M. 2017; Enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in oesophageal cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 12:e0174382. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174382. PMID: 28350805. PMCID: PMC5370110.
Article
6. Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, Iida H, Yoshii K, Asano H, et al. 2017; Effects of implementing an "enhanced recovery after surgery" program on patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today. 47:42–51. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-016-1344-2. PMID: 27165267.
Article
7. Savikko J, Ilmakunnas M, Mäkisalo H, Nordin A, Isoniemi H. 2015; Enhanced recovery protocol after liver resection. Br J Surg. 102:1526–1532. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9912. PMID: 26331595.
Article
8. Melloul E, Hübner M, Scott M, Snowden C, Prentis J, Dejong CH, et al. 2016; Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 40:2425–2440. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1. PMID: 27549599.
Article
9. Bai X, Zhang Q, Gao S, Lou J, Li G, Zhang Y, et al. 2016; Duct-to- mucosa vs invagination for pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, randomized controlled trial from a single surgeon. J Am Coll Surg. 222:10–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.10.003. PMID: 26577499.
10. Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K, Carli F, de Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Schäfer M, et al. 2012; Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr. 31:817–830. DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.011. PMID: 23079762.
11. Liang X, Ying H, Wang H, Xu H, Yu H, Cai L, et al. 2016; Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore). 95:e2835. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002835. PMID: 26937913. PMCID: PMC4779010.
Article
12. Li L, Chen J, Liu Z, Li Q, Shi Y. 2017; Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care after hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 96:e8052. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008052. PMID: 28930840. PMCID: PMC5617707.
13. Francisco SC, Batista ST, Pena Gd. 2015; Fasting in elective surgical patients: comparison among the time prescribed, performed and recommended on perioperative care protocols. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 28:250–254. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-6720201500040008. PMID: 26734794. PMCID: PMC4755176.
Article
14. Brauer DG, Nywening TM, Jaques DP, Doyle MB, Chapman WC, Fields RC, et al. 2016; Operative site drainage after hepatectomy: a propensity score matched analysis using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Targeted Hepatectomy Database. J Am Coll Surg. 223:774–783. e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.09.004. PMID: 27793459. PMCID: PMC5125822.
Article
15. Kyoden Y, Imamura H, Sano K, Beck Y, Sugawara Y, Kokudo N, et al. 2010; Value of prophylactic abdominal drainage in 1269 consecutive cases of elective liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 17:186–192. DOI: 10.1007/s00534-009-0161-z. PMID: 19727544.
Article
16. Lee J, Kwon CH, Kim JM, Shin M, Joh JW. 2012; Effect of early enteral nutrition after hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 16:129–133. DOI: 10.14701/kjhbps.2012.16.4.129. PMID: 26388922. PMCID: PMC4574999.
Article
17. Ji HB, Zhu WT, Wei Q, Wang XX, Wang HB, Chen QP. 2018; Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery programs on pancreatic surgery: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 24:1666–1678. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i15.1666. PMID: 29686474. PMCID: PMC5910550.
Article
Full Text Links
  • AHBPS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr