J Korean Med Sci.  2021 Feb;36(6):e35. 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e35.

Current Status of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea

Affiliations
  • 1National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea
  • 2Department of Family Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
  • 3Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea

Abstract

Background
The development process of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) must adhere to development standards and must be supported and steered by a representative and consistent governing body. We aimed to investigate the current status of the most recent CPGs published in Korea through surveys of medical professional societies and literature searches.
Methods
We collected CPGs developed in Korea in the past 5 years through several electronic database searches (MEDLINE, Embase, and KoreaMed), hand searches, and surveys of medical society memberships from the Korean Academy Medical Societies. Three authors selected Korean CPGs according to our inclusion/exclusion criteria and extracted data from selected CPGs about general characteristics, characteristics of CPGs for setup, evidence evaluation, and the finalization phase.
Results
Out of 2,337 articles searched from various sources and 66 documents collected by survey, 129 guidelines (122 by database searching and 7 by survey) were selected. During the recent 5 years, the yearly numbers of CPGs developed were around 25. A single organization was the most frequent CPG development body (42, 32.6%). The most common development methodologies described in the CPGs included were de novo (53, 41.1%) followed by adaptation (48, 37.2%) and hybrid (4, 3.1%). Systematic literature searching was performed in most of the guidelines (79.8%). The evidence level was reported in 104 guidelines (80.6%). There were 77 guidelines (59.7%) that reported an update plan. Fifty guidelines were published in Korean (41.0%), and 46 guidelines were published in English only (37.7%).
Conclusion
Among CPGs developed in Korea in the last 5 years, the proportion adhering to CPG development standards has increased, but there is still room for improvement.

Keyword

Practice Guidelines; Evidence-based Medicine; Current Status; Standard of Care

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram of clinical practice guideline selection.GIN = Guideline International Network.


Cited by  2 articles

Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines: Current Status of Adherence to the RIGHT Checklist
Miyoung Choi, You Kyoung Lee, Soo Young Kim,
J Korean Med Sci. 2022;37(4):e26.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e26.

Two Years of Experience and Methodology of Korean COVID-19 Living Clinical Practice Guideline Development
Miyoung Choi, Hyeon-Jeong Lee, Su-Yeon Yu, Jimin Kim, Jungeun Park, Seungeun Ryoo, Inho Kim, Dong Ah Park, Young Kyung Yoon, Joon-Sung Joh, Sunghoon Park, Ki Wook Yun, Chi-Hoon Choi, Jae-Seok Kim, Sue Shin, Hyun Kim, Kyungmin Huh, In-Seok Jeong, Soo-Han Choi, Sung Ho Hwang, Hyukmin Lee, Dong Keon Lee, Hwan Seok Yong, Ho Kee Yum
J Korean Med Sci. 2023;38(23):e195.    doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e195.


Reference

1. Institute of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press;2011.
2. Kim SY, Hwang I, Yoon JL, Cho JJ, Choi YH, Rho YG, et al. A selection and translation of evidence based clinical practice guidelines for primary care physician in respiratory disease field. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 2004; 25(3):205–215.
3. Kim SY. The standards of clinical practice guideline. J Health Tech Assess. 2016; 4(2):53–57.
4. Jo MW, Lee JY, Kim NS, Kim SY, Sheen S, Kim SH, et al. Assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in Korea using the AGREE Instrument. J Korean Med Sci. 2013; 28(3):357–365. PMID: 23487579.
Article
5. Ahn HS, Kim HJ. Development and implementation of clinical practice guidelines: current status in Korea. J Korean Med Sci. 2012; 27 Suppl(Suppl):S55–60. PMID: 22661872.
Article
6. Choi M, Kim NS, Sheen S, Ji SM, Lyu DH, You JH, et al. Current status of clinical practice guideline development and dissemination in Korea for identifying collaborative research demands. Evid Value. 2015; 1(1):16–23.
7. Ji SM, Kim SY, Sheen SS, Heo DS, Kim NS. Consensus on definition and quality standard of clinical practice guideline using RAND method. Health Policy Manag. 2010; 20(2):1–16.
Article
8. Kim SY, Choi MY, Shin SS, Ji SM, Park JJ, Yoo JH, et al. NECA's Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency;2015.
9. The ADAPTE Collaboration. The ADAPTE process: resource toolkit for guidelines adaptation. Updated 2009. Accessed September 30, 2020. https://g-i-n.net/document-store/working-groups-documents/adaptation/resources/adapte-resource-toolkit-guideline-adaptation-2-0.pdf.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr