Yeungnam Univ J Med.  2021 Jan;38(1):10-18. 10.12701/yujm.2020.00444.

Classification of endometriosis

• Lee SY
• Koo YJ
• Lee DH

• KMID: 2512061
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2020.00444

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic disease associated with pelvic pain and infertility. Several classification systems for the severity of endometriosis have been proposed. Of these, the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification is the most well-known. The ENZIAN classification was developed to classify deep infiltrating endometriosis and focused on the retroperitoneal structures. The endometriosis fertility index was developed to predict the fertility outcomes in patients who underwent surgery for endometriosis. Finally, the American Association of Gynecological Laparoscopists classification is currently being developed, for which 30 endometriosis experts are analyzing and researching data by assigning scores to categories considered important; however, it has not yet been fully validated and published. Currently, none of the classification systems are considered the gold standard. In this article, we review the classification systems, identify their pros and cons, and discuss what improvements need to be made to each system in the future.

Keyword

American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification; Classification; Endometriosis; ENZIAN classification

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. The revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis. This system is the well-known classification of endometriosis. Reproduced from American Society for Reproductive Medicine [8] with permission of Elsevier.

• 

  Fig. 2. The ENZIAN staging system for women with deep endometriosis. This system was developed as a supplement to the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine score, in order to provide detailed descriptions of the retroperitoneal structure. Adapted from 7th Conference of the Stiftung Endometriose Forschung [16] (https://www.endometriose-sef.de/aktivitaeten/klassifikation-enzian/).

• 

  Fig. 3. Endometriosis fertility index (EFI) system. This score predicts the fertility outcome for women who attempt non-in vitro fertilization conception following surgically documented endometriosis. Reproduced from Adamson and Pasta [20] with permission of Elsevier.

Reference

References

1. Dunselman GA, Vermeulen N, Becker C, Calhaz-Jorge C, D’Hooghe T, De Bie B, et al. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29:400–12.

2. Adamson GD, Kennedy S, Hummelshoj L. Creating solutions in endometriosis: global collaboration through the World Endometriosis Research Foundation. J Endometr. 2010; 2:3–6.

3. Statistics Korea. Outpatient benefits by frequency of disease (total) 2018 [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2019. [cited 2020 May 8]. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=350&tblId=DT_35001_A084112&vw_cd=MT_ZTITLE&list_id=350_35001_6&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=MT_ZTITLE.

4. Soliman AM, Surrey ES, Bonafede M, Nelson JK, Vora JB, Agarwal SK. Health care utilization and costs associated with endometriosis among women with medicaid insurance. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019; 25:566–72.

5. Sampson JA. Perforating hemorrhagic (chocolate) cysts of the ovary: their importance and especially their relation to pelvic adenomas of endometrial type (“adenomyoma” of the uterus, rectovaginal septum, sigmoid, etc.). Arch Surg. 1921; 3:245–323.

6. The American Fertility Society. Classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1979; 32:633–4.

7. Hasson HM. Classification for endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1981; 35:368–9.

8. Revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril. 1997; 67:817–21.

9. Fernando S, Soh PQ, Cooper M, Evans S, Reid G, Tsaltas J, et al. Reliability of visual diagnosis of endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20:783–9.

10. Hornstein MD, Gleason RE, Orav J, Haas ST, Friedman AJ, Rein MS, et al. The reproducibility of the revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1993; 59:1015–21.

11. Vercellini P, Trespidi L, De Giorgi O, Cortesi I, Parazzini F, Crosignani PG. Endometriosis and pelvic pain: relation to disease stage and localization. Fertil Steril. 1996; 65:299–304.

12. Guzick DS, Bross DS, Rock JA. Assessing the efficacy of The American Fertility Society’s classification of endometriosis: application of a dose-response methodology. Fertil Steril. 1982; 38:171–6.

13. Tuttlies F, Keckstein J, Ulrich U, Possover M, Schweppe KW, Wustlich M, et al. ENZIAN-score, a classification of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2005; 127:275–81.

14. Haas D, Chvatal R, Habelsberger A, Wurm P, Schimetta W, Oppelt P. Comparison of revised American Fertility Society and ENZIAN staging: a critical evaluation of classifications of endometriosis on the basis of our patient population. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95:1574–8.

15. Stiftung Endometriose Forschung. In : 6th Conference of the Stiftung Endometriose Forschung (Foundation for Endometriosis Research); 2010 Feb 19–21; Weissensee, Austria. Weissensee. Stiftung Endometriose Forschung;2010.

16. Stiftung Endometriose Forschung. The revised Enzian classification. In : Consensus meeting, 7th Conference of the Stiftung Endometriose Forschung (Foundation for Endometriosis Research); 2011 Feb 25–27; Weissensee, Austria. Weissensee. Stiftung Endometriose Forschung. 2011.

17. Di Paola V, Manfredi R, Castelli F, Negrelli R, Mehrabi S, Pozzi Mucelli R. Detection and localization of deep endometriosis by means of MRI and correlation with the ENZIAN score. Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84:568–74.

18. Montanari E, Dauser B, Keckstein J, Kirchner E, Nemeth Z, Hudelist G. Association between disease extent and pain symptoms in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2019; 39:845–51.

19. Johnson NP, Hummelshoj L, Adamson GD, Keckstein J, Taylor HS, Abrao MS, et al. World Endometriosis Society consensus on the classification of endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32:315–24.

20. Adamson GD, Pasta DJ. Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94:1609–15.

21. Zeng C, Xu JN, Zhou Y, Zhou YF, Zhu SN, Xue Q. Reproductive performance after surgery for endometriosis: predictive value of the revised American Fertility Society classification and the endometriosis fertility index. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2014; 77:180–5.

22. Wang W, Li R, Fang T, Huang L, Ouyang N, Wang L, et al. Endometriosis fertility index score maybe more accurate for predicting the outcomes of in vitro fertilisation than r-AFS classification in women with endometriosis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013; 11:112.

23. Endometriosis Classification Committee; Ad hoc committee of the AAGL. AAGL endometriosis tabulation system. California (CA): Cypress;2007.

24. Chapron C, Abrao MS, Miller CE. Endometriosis classifications need to be revisited: a new one is arriving. NewsScope. 2012; 26(4):9–10.

25. Jansen RP, Russell P. Nonpigmented endometriosis: clinical, laparoscopic, and pathologic definition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986; 155:1154–9.

26. Koninckx PR, Ussia A, Adamyan L, Wattiez A. An endometriosis classification, designed to be validated. Gynecol Surg. 2011; 8:1–6.

27. Abrao MS, Miller CE. An endometriosis classification, designed to be validated. NewsScope. 2012; 25(4):6.

28. Working group of ESGE, ESHRE, and WES, Keckstein J, Becker CM, Canis M, Feki A, Grimbizis GF, et al. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2020; 2020:hoaa002.