J Korean Soc Matern Child Health.  2020 Jan;24(1):1-8. 10.21896/jksmch.2020.24.1.1.

Constitutional Legislative Proposal for Life Protection

• Eom J

• KMID: 2511148
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.21896/jksmch.2020.24.1.1

Abstract

In April 2019, the Constitutional Court's decision on abortions left challenges in our society about addressing the value of life and the rights and safety of pregnant women. This paper examines the implication of and problems with the decision of the Constitutional Court - affecting the meaning and understanding of a fetus’s right to life versus a pregnant woman’s right to self-determination, the determinable period, and the independent viability of the fetus. As for the legislative guidelines, the text of the related bill included the following consideration: the fetus’ right to life and the biological father’s responsibilities; institutional guarantees to support pregnancy, childbirth, and nursing by pregnant women as a social security approach; exclusion of socioeconomic reasons and careful consideration; and the provisions of Fetal Life Protection Counseling, guaranteeing the right of veto participating the operation of abortions and government's supervision of abortions. In this paper, the Bill entitled “Act for Expanding Pregnancy Support and Preventing and Overcoming Pregnancy Conflict” may be used as a reference for future parliamentary debates, and may be a stepping stone for legislation that can save fetus’ lives, women's lives, and the future.

Keyword

Abortion; Constitutional nonconformity; Right to life; Fetus; Right of self-determination

Reference

Ahn SJ. Legal implication on artificial wombs: for legal approaches surrounding this specifically hypothetical reality. Anam law Rev. 2016. 51:413–57.

Eom JH. Decision making of withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for minors in the U.S. Soongsil Law Rev. 2018. 41:121–44.

Eom JH., Yang JH. Review on the exercise of the right to self-determination and its limitation surrounding the case of abortion at the constitutional court in Korea. Sungkyunkwan Law Rev. 2018. 30:65–92.

Jang JY. Status of promoting US legislation against abortion. Seongsan Forum Sourcebook;Oct. 2019.

Kim A., Lee M. A health professional’s right in abortion: focusing on the decisions of 2017 Hun-ba 127. Korean J Med Law. 2019. 27:49–65.

Lee BH. The fundamental right to protect life and the prohibition on the underprotected. Dong-A Law Rev. 2014. 62:1–21.

Lee E. An assignment of criminal law for systematization of self-determination. Pusan Law Rev. 2013. 54:261–88.

Nam BH. Review in the constitutional procedure law about the constitutional court decision of abortion. Const Rev. 2019. 25:275–301.

Shin O. A study on the constitutional legislative reform after constitutional court decision about abortion. Korean Public Law Assoc. 2019. 47:175–205.

Yim YJ. Judicial review on the constitutionality of the bill proposing conscientious abortion refusal in Chile. Law Times. 2019. Oct. 24.