Vasc Spec Int.  2020 Dec;36(4):216-223. 10.5758/vsi.200051.

Outcomes of Unibody Bifurcated Endograft and Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

• Ghoneim B
• Elsherif M
• Elsharkawi M
• Acharya Y
• Hynes N
• Tawfick W
• Sultan S

• KMID: 2510485
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5758/vsi.200051

Abstract

Purpose
We compared the outcomes between the total endovascular approach using a unibody bifurcated aortoiliac endograft and the gold standard aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) surgery for the management of extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD).
Materials and Methods
This retrospective observational study compared the outcomes of endovascular technique with unibody bifurcated endograft (UBE) using the Endologix AFX unibody stent-graft and a standard surgical approach (ABF) in the management of AIOD based on patient records in Western Vascular Institute, Galway University Hospital, National University of Ireland. Procedural details and outcomes were documented to compare both groups.
Results
From January 2002 to December 2018, 67 patients underwent AIOD (20 UBE and 47 ABF). Both the ABF and UBE groups showed 100% immediate clinical and technical successes without 30-day mortality. There were no statistical differences in the overall survival and sustained clinical improvement between the bypass and the UBE groups; however, statistically significant differences were observed in 3-year freedom from re-intervention and amputation-free survival. Furthermore, the mean length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly lower in the UBE group than that in the ABF group (0.75 days vs. 3.1 days, P=0.001).
Conclusion
Total endovascular reconstruction of AIOD is an alternative to invasive bypass procedures, with a shorter ICU stay.

Keyword

Arterial occlusive diseases; Endovascular procedures; Comparative study