Korean J Pain.  2021 Jan;34(1):58-65. 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.1.58.

Systemically administered neurotensin receptor agonist produces antinociception through activation of spinally projecting serotonergic neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
  • 2Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
  • 3Center for Creative Biomedical Scientists, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

Abstract

Background
Supraspinal delivery of neurotensin (NTS), which may contribute to the effect of a systemically administered agonist, has been reported to be either pronociceptive or antinociceptive. Here, we evaluated the effects of systemically administered NTSR1 agonist in a rat model of neuropathic pain and elucidated the underlying supraspinal mechanism.
Methods
Neuropathic pain was induced by L5 and L6 spinal nerve ligation in male Sprague–Dawley rats. The effects of intraperitoneally administered NTSR1 agonist PD 149163 was assessed using von Frey filaments. To examine the role of 5-HT neurotransmission, a serotonin (5-HT) receptor antagonist dihydroergocristine was pretreated intrathecally, and spinal microdialysis studies were performed to measure the change in extracellular level of 5-HT in response to PD 149163 administration. To investigate the supraspinal mechanism, NTSR1 antagonist 48692 was microinjected into the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) prior to systemic PD 149163. Additionally, the effect of intrathecal DHE on intra-RVM PD 149163 was assessed.
Results
Intraperitoneally administered PD 149163 exhibited a dose-dependent attenuation of mechanical allodynia. This effect was partially reversed by intrathecal pretreatment with dihydroergocristine and was accompanied by an increased extracellular level of 5-HT in the spinal cord. The PD 149163-produced antinociception was also blocked by intra-RVM SB 48692. Direct injection of PD 149163 into the RVM mimicked the maximum effect of the same drug delivered intraperitoneally, which was reversed by intrathecal dihydroergocristine.
Conclusions
These observations indicate that systemically administered NTSR1 agonist produces antinociception through the NTSR1 in the RVM, activating descending serotonergic projection to release 5-HT into the spinal dorsal horn.

Keyword

Analgesia; Central Nervous System; Microdialysis; Neuralgia; Neurotensin; Rats; Receptors; Neurotensin; Serotonin; Spinal Cord

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Time-response (A) and dose-response (B) data showing the effects of intraperitoneally administered PD 149163, on the hind paw withdrawal response in spinal nerve-ligated rats. Data are presented as the mechanical withdrawal thresholds in grams or the area under the time course curve (AUC) for the withdrawal threshold. Each line or bar represents the mean ± standard error of mean of 6 rats. i.p.: intraperitoneal, BL: baseline value, i.t.: intrathecal, DHE: dihydroergocristine. *P = 0.048 compared to the vehicle group. §P < 0.001 compared to the vehicle group. †P = 0.032 compared to the PD 149163 300 μg/kg group.

  • Fig. 2 Microdialysis measurements of spinal 5-HT following intraperitoneal administration of PD 149163 (300 μg/kg) or vehicle. Data are presented over time as a mean ± standard error of mean percentage of the baseline (n = 5 in each group). BL: baseline value. *P < 0.05 compared to baseline value.

  • Fig. 3 Time-response data (A) and quantification by area under the time course curves (AUC) (B) showing the effects of microinjection of SB 48692 or vehicle into the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) and intraperitoneal administration of PD 149163 or vehicle. Data are presented as the mechanical withdrawal thresholds in grams or the AUC for the withdrawal threshold. Each line or bar represents the mean ± standard error of mean of 5 rats. inj.: injection, i.p.: intraperitoneal, BL: baseline value, DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide. *P = 0.002 compared to the intraperitoneal PD 149163 group (300 μg/kg).

  • Fig. 4 Time-response (A) and dose-response (B) data showing the effects of intra-nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) administration of PD 149163, on the hind paw withdrawal response in spinal nerve-ligated rats. Data are presented as the mechanical withdrawal thresholds in grams or the area under the time course curve (AUC) for the withdrawal threshold. Each line or bar represents the mean ± standard error of mean of 5 rats. BL: baseline value, i.t.: intrathecal, DHE: dihydroergocristine. *P < 0.005 compared to the vehicle group. §P = 0.048 compared to the PD 149163 5 ng group.


Reference

1. Carraway R, Leeman SE. 1973; The isolation of a new hypotensive peptide, neurotensin, from bovine hypothalami. J Biol Chem. 248:6854–61. PMID: 4745447.
Article
2. Mustain WC, Rychahou PG, Evers BM. 2011; The role of neurotensin in physiologic and pathologic processes. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 18:75–82. DOI: 10.1097/MED.0b013e3283419052. PMID: 21124211.
Article
3. Boules M, Li Z, Smith K, Fredrickson P, Richelson E. 2013; Diverse roles of neurotensin agonists in the central nervous system. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 4:36. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00036. PMID: 23526754. PMCID: PMC3605594.
Article
4. Kleczkowska P, Lipkowski AW. 2013; Neurotensin and neurotensin receptors: characteristic, structure-activity relationship and pain modulation--a review. Eur J Pharmacol. 716:54–60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.03.004. PMID: 23500196.
Article
5. Fassio A, Evans G, Grisshammer R, Bolam JP, Mimmack M, Emson PC. 2000; Distribution of the neurotensin receptor NTS1 in the rat CNS studied using an amino-terminal directed antibody. Neuropharmacology. 39:1430–42. DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3908(00)00060-5. PMID: 10818259.
Article
6. Buhler AV, Choi J, Proudfit HK, Gebhart GF. 2005; Neurotensin activation of the NTR1 on spinally-projecting serotonergic neurons in the rostral ventromedial medulla is antinociceptive. Pain. 114:285–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.031. PMID: 15733655.
Article
7. Roussy G, Dansereau MA, Doré-Savard L, Belleville K, Beaudet N, Richelson E, et al. 2008; Spinal NTS1 receptors regulate nociceptive signaling in a rat formalin tonic pain model. J Neurochem. 105:1100–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05205.x. PMID: 18182046.
Article
8. Guillemette A, Dansereau MA, Beaudet N, Richelson E, Sarret P. 2012; Intrathecal administration of NTS1 agonists reverses nociceptive behaviors in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pain. 16:473–84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.07.008. PMID: 22396077.
9. Holmes BB, Rady JJ, Smith DJ, Fujimoto JM. 1999; Supraspinal neurotensin-induced antianalgesia in mice is mediated by spinal cholecystokinin. Jpn J Pharmacol. 79:141–9. DOI: 10.1254/jjp.79.141. PMID: 10202849.
Article
10. Urban MO, Smith DJ. 1994; Localization of the antinociceptive and antianalgesic effects of neurotensin within the rostral ventromedial medulla. Neurosci Lett. 174:21–5. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90109-0. PMID: 7970148.
Article
11. Smith DJ, Hawranko AA, Monroe PJ, Gully D, Urban MO, Craig CR, et al. 1997; Dose-dependent pain-facilitatory and -inhibitory actions of neurotensin are revealed by SR 48692, a nonpeptide neurotensin antagonist: influence on the antinociceptive effect of morphine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 282:899–908. PMID: 9262357.
12. Urban MO, Coutinho SV, Gebhart GF. 1999; Biphasic modulation of visceral nociception by neurotensin in rat rostral ventromedial medulla. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 290:207–13. PMID: 10381777.
13. Kim SH, Chung JM. 1992; An experimental model for peripheral neuropathy produced by segmental spinal nerve ligation in the rat. Pain. 50:355–63. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90041-9. PMID: 1333581.
Article
14. Koh GH, Song H, Kim SH, Yoon MH, Lim KJ, Oh SH, et al. 2019; Effect of sec-O-glucosylhamaudol on mechanical allodynia in a rat model of postoperative pain. Korean J Pain. 32:87–96. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2019.32.2.87. PMID: 31091507. PMCID: PMC6549587.
Article
15. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. 1994; Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw. J Neurosci Methods. 53:55–63. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90144-9. PMID: 7990513.
Article
16. Yin M, Kim YO, Choi JI, Jeong S, Yang SH, Bae HB, et al. 2020; Antinociceptive role of neurotensin receptor 1 in rats with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Korean J Pain. 33:318–25. DOI: 10.3344/kjp.2020.33.4.318. PMID: 32989196. PMCID: PMC7532295.
Article
17. Lee HG, Choi JI, Yoon MH, Obata H, Saito S, Kim WM. 2014; The antiallodynic effect of intrathecal tianeptine is exerted by increased serotonin and norepinephrine in the spinal dorsal horn. Neurosci Lett. 583:103–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.09.022. PMID: 25233863.
Article
18. Chae JW, Kang DH, Li Y, Kim SH, Lee HG, Choi JI, et al. 2020; Antinociceptive effects of nefopam modulating serotonergic, adrenergic, and glutamatergic neurotransmission in the spinal cord. Neurosci Lett. 731:135057. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135057. PMID: 32450186.
Article
19. Paxinos G, Watson C. 2014. Paxinos and Watson's the rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 7th ed. Academic Press;London: p. 116–32.
20. Bodnar RJ, Wallace MM, Nilaver G, Zimmerman EA. 1982; The effects of centrally administered antisera to neurotensin and related peptides upon nociception and related behaviors. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 400:244–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1982.tb31573.x. PMID: 6188400.
Article
21. Millan MJ. 2002; Descending control of pain. Prog Neurobiol. 66:355–474. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-0082(02)00009-6. PMID: 12034378.
Article
22. Mason P. 1999; Central mechanisms of pain modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 9:436–41. DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80065-8. PMID: 10448161.
Article
23. Wang QP, Nakai Y. 1994; The dorsal raphe: an important nucleus in pain modulation. Brain Res Bull. 34:575–85. DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(94)90143-0. PMID: 7922601.
Article
24. Fang FG, Moreau JL, Fields HL. 1987; Dose-dependent antinociceptive action of neurotensin microinjected into the rostroventromedial medulla of the rat. Brain Res. 420:171–4. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(87)90255-1. PMID: 3676752.
Article
25. Costa-Pereira JT, Serrão P, Martins I, Tavares I. 2020; Serotoninergic pain modulation from the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: the role of spinal 5-HT3 receptors. Eur J Neurosci. 51:1756–69. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14614. PMID: 31691396.
Article
26. Behbehani MM. 1992; Physiological mechanisms of the analgesic effect of neurotensin. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 668:253–65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb27354.x. PMID: 1361116.
Article
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr