J Korean Med Sci.  2020 Apr;35(14):e97. 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e97.

Trends of Premature and Early Menopause: a Comparative Study of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Affiliations
  • 1CHA Fertility Center, Seoul Station, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
  • 3Graduate School of Public Health, Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Background
While evidence shows a tendency toward delays in menopause worldwide, whether prevalence of premature (< 40 years) or early menopause (40–44 years) is also reduced in different ethnic groups is uncertain. The aim of this study was to explore birth cohort effect in the prevalence of premature and early menopause in United States (US) and Korea.
Methods
This is a retrospective study using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, 1999–2014) and the Korea NHANES (KNHANES, 2007–2012). We analyzed prevalence of premature and early menopause in three ethnic groups of US and Korea. We restricted our analysis to women aged ≥ 45 years at the time of the survey born between 1920 and 1969. The data of both eligible 9,209 US women and 9,828 Korean was included in final analysis. We calculated odds ratios (OR) for each outcome adjusting for biological and socioeconomic factors, respectively.
Results
Prevalence of premature menopause was 1.7% in US, 2.8% in Korean women. Early menopause occurred in 3.4% and 7.2% of US and Korean, respectively. In US women, prevalence of premature and early menopause did not change and did not differ across three ethnicities. Korean women showed highest and consistently decreasing prevalence (P < 0.001). When we adjusted for covariates, birth lower risk for premature menopause was evident in US Non-Hispanic black born in 1950s and in Korean born between 1940s and 1960s compared to those born in 1920s. In the analysis of early menopause, excluding premature menopause patients, lower risk of more recent generation (born in 1940s and later) was evident in Korean women.
Conclusion
The trend and birth cohort effect in occurrence of premature and early menopause among the US and Korea women are different. Prevalences of premature and early menopause decrease only in Korean.

Keyword

Menopause; Ethnicity; Socioeconomic Status

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Exclusion of study population of US (NHANES, 1999–2014) and Korean women (KNHANES, 2007–2012).NHANES = National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, KNHANES = Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

  • Fig. 2 Trend of cohort-specific prevalence of premature and early menopause in the three ethnic groups in US and Korean women. (A) Premature menopause (< 40 years), (B) Early menopause (40–44 years).


Reference

1. McKinlay SM. The normal menopause transition: an overview. Maturitas. 1996; 23(2):137–145. PMID: 8735352.
Article
2. Reynolds RF, Obermeyer CM. Age at natural menopause in Spain and the United States: results from the DAMES project. Am J Hum Biol. 2005; 17(3):331–340. PMID: 15849704.
Article
3. Luborsky JL, Meyer P, Sowers MF, Gold EB, Santoro N. Premature menopause in a multi-ethnic population study of the menopause transition. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18(1):199–206. PMID: 12525467.
Article
4. Haller-Kikkatalo K, Uibo R, Kurg A, Salumets A. The prevalence and phenotypic characteristics of spontaneous premature ovarian failure: a general population registry-based study. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(5):1229–1238. PMID: 25712230.
Article
5. Mishra GD, Pandeya N, Dobson AJ, Chung HF, Anderson D, Kuh D, et al. Early menarche, nulliparity and the risk for premature and early natural menopause. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(3):679–686. PMID: 28119483.
Article
6. Wu X, Cai H, Kallianpur A, Li H, Yang G, Gao J, et al. Impact of premature ovarian failure on mortality and morbidity among Chinese women. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e89597. PMID: 24603759.
Article
7. Podfigurna-Stopa A, Czyzyk A, Grymowicz M, Smolarczyk R, Katulski K, Czajkowski K, et al. Premature ovarian insufficiency: the context of long-term effects. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016; 39(9):983–990. PMID: 27091671.
Article
8. Muka T, Oliver-Williams C, Kunutsor S, Laven JS, Fauser BC, Chowdhury R, et al. Association of age at onset of menopause and time since onset of menopause with cardiovascular outcomes, intermediate vascular traits, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 1(7):767–776. PMID: 27627190.
9. Kim YE, Park H, Jo MW, Oh IH, Go DS, Jung J, et al. Trends and patterns of burden of disease and injuries in Korea using disability-adjusted life years. J Korean Med Sci. 2019; 34(Suppl 1):e75. PMID: 30923488.
Article
10. Faubion SS, Kuhle CL, Shuster LT, Rocca WA. Long-term health consequences of premature or early menopause and considerations for management. Climacteric. 2015; 18(4):483–491. PMID: 25845383.
Article
11. Girard R, Météreau E, Thomas J, Pugeat M, Qu C, Dreher JC. Hormone therapy at early post-menopause increases cognitive control-related prefrontal activity. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):44917. PMID: 28322310.
Article
12. Tibiletti MG, Testa G, Vegetti W, Alagna F, Taborelli M, Dalprà L, et al. The idiopathic forms of premature menopause and early menopause show the same genetic pattern. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(11):2731–2734. PMID: 10548611.
Article
13. Hoyos LR, Thakur M. Fragile X premutation in women: recognizing the health challenges beyond primary ovarian insufficiency. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017; 34(3):315–323. PMID: 27995424.
Article
14. Beck-Peccoz P, Persani L. Premature ovarian failure. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2006; 1(1):9. PMID: 16722528.
Article
15. Persani L, Rossetti R, Cacciatore C. Genes involved in human premature ovarian failure. J Mol Endocrinol. 2010; 45(5):257–279. PMID: 20668067.
Article
16. Hewlett M, Mahalingaiah S. Update on primary ovarian insufficiency. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2015; 22(6):483–489. PMID: 26512773.
Article
17. Zsakai A, Mascie-Taylor N, Bodzsar EB. Relationship between some indicators of reproductive history, body fatness and the menopausal transition in Hungarian women. J Physiol Anthropol. 2015; 34(1):35. PMID: 26494263.
Article
18. Hardy R, Kuh D. Reproductive characteristics and the age at inception of the perimenopause in a British National Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 149(7):612–620. PMID: 10192308.
Article
19. Gold EB. The timing of the age at which natural menopause occurs. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011; 38(3):425–440. PMID: 21961711.
Article
20. Forman MR, Mangini LD, Thelus-Jean R, Hayward MD. Life-course origins of the ages at menarche and menopause. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2013; 4:1–21. PMID: 24600293.
Article
21. Chang SH, Kim CS, Lee KS, Kim H, Yim SV, Lim YJ, et al. Premenopausal factors influencing premature ovarian failure and early menopause. Maturitas. 2007; 58(1):19–30. PMID: 17531410.
Article
22. Yasui T, Hayashi K, Mizunuma H, Kubota T, Aso T, Matsumura Y, et al. Factors associated with premature ovarian failure, early menopause and earlier onset of menopause in Japanese women. Maturitas. 2012; 72(3):249–255. PMID: 22572589.
Article
23. Hardy R, Kuh D. Social and environmental conditions across the life course and age at menopause in a British birth cohort study. BJOG. 2005; 112(3):346–354. PMID: 15713152.
Article
24. Luoto R, Kaprio J, Uutela A. Age at natural menopause and sociodemographic status in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 139(1):64–76. PMID: 8296776.
Article
25. Lawlor DA, Ebrahim S, Smith GD. The association of socio-economic position across the life course and age at menopause: the British Women's Heart and Health Study. BJOG. 2003; 110(12):1078–1087. PMID: 14664879.
Article
26. Kriplani A, Banerjee K. An overview of age of onset of menopause in northern India. Maturitas. 2005; 52(3-4):199–204. PMID: 16257611.
Article
27. Kaczmarek M. The timing of natural menopause in Poland and associated factors. Maturitas. 2007; 57(2):139–153. PMID: 17307314.
Article
28. Nichols HB, Trentham-Dietz A, Hampton JM, Titus-Ernstoff L, Egan KM, Willett WC, et al. From menarche to menopause: trends among US Women born from 1912 to 1969. Am J Epidemiol. 2006; 164(10):1003–1011. PMID: 16928728.
Article
29. Pakarinen M, Raitanen J, Kaaja R, Luoto R. Secular trend in the menopausal age in Finland 1997–2007 and correlation with socioeconomic, reproductive and lifestyle factors. Maturitas. 2010; 66(4):417–422. PMID: 20537824.
Article
30. Wang D, Wang M, Cheng N, Zheng T, Hu X, Li H, et al. Sulfur dioxide exposure and other factors affecting age at natural menopause in the Jinchuan cohort. Climacteric. 2015; 18(5):722–732. PMID: 25853925.
Article
31. Mirel LB, Mohadjer LK, Dohrmann SM, Clark J, Burt VL, Johnson CL, et al. National health and nutrition examination survey: estimation procedures, 2007–2010. Vital Health Stat 2. 2013; (159):1–17.
32. Curtin LR, Mohadjer LK, Dohrmann SM, Kruszon-Moran D, Mirel LB, Carroll MD, et al. National health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 2007–2010. Vital Health Stat 2. 2013; (160):1–23.
33. Park HA. The Korea national health and nutrition examination survey as a primary data source. Korean J Fam Med. 2013; 34(2):79. PMID: 23560205.
Article
34. Wise LA, Krieger N, Zierler S, Harlow BL. Lifetime socioeconomic position in relation to onset of perimenopause. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002; 56(11):851–860. PMID: 12388578.
Article
35. Tawfik H, Kline J, Jacobson J, Tehranifar P, Protacio A, Flom JD, et al. Life course exposure to smoke and early menopause and menopausal transition. Menopause. 2015; 22(10):1076–1083. PMID: 25803667.
Article
36. Park YJ, Kim HS, Kang HC. The age at menopause and related factors in Korean women. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2002; 32(7):1024–1031.
Article
37. Shin YJ, Song JY, Kim MJ, Choi JI, Han KD, Lee HN. Relationship between age at last delivery and age at menopause: the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2017; 60(4):362–368. PMID: 28791268.
Article
38. Committee Opinion No. 605: primary ovarian insufficiency in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123:193–197.
39. Agaba P, Meloni S, Sule H, Ocheke A, Agaba E, Idoko J, et al. Factors associated with early menopause among women in Nigeria. J Virus Erad. 2017; 3(3):145–151. PMID: 28758022.
Article
40. Deering VA. Prevalence of premature ovarian failure and premature menopause in refugee and immigrant women in the U.S. compared to that of women born in the United States [Thesis]. New York, NY: Stony Brook University;2014.
41. Elias SG, van Noord PA, Peeters PH, den Tonkelaar I, Grobbee DE. Caloric restriction reduces age at menopause: the effect of the 1944-1945 Dutch famine. Menopause. 2003; 10(5):399–405. PMID: 14501600.
Article
42. Wang N, Huang Y, Wen J, Su Q, Huang Y, Cai L, et al. Early life exposure to famine and reproductive aging among Chinese women. Menopause. 2019; 26(5):463–468. PMID: 30516712.
Article
43. Yarde F, Broekmans FJ, van der Pal-de Bruin KM, Schönbeck Y, te Velde ER, Stein AD, et al. Prenatal famine, birthweight, reproductive performance and age at menopause: the Dutch hunger winter families study. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(12):3328–3336. PMID: 23966246.
Article
44. Hardy R, Kuh D. Does early growth influence timing of the menopause? Evidence from a British birth cohort. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17(9):2474–2479. PMID: 12202444.
Article
45. Wang M, Yi Y, Roebothan B, Colbourne J, Maddalena V, Wang PP, et al. Body mass index trajectories among middle-aged and elderly Canadians and associated health outcomes. J Environ Public Health. 2016; 2016:7014857. PMID: 26925112.
Article
46. de Vries E, den Tonkelaar I, van Noord PA, van der Schouw YT, te Velde ER, Peeters PH. Oral contraceptive use in relation to age at menopause in the DOM cohort. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(8):1657–1662. PMID: 11473959.
47. van Noord PA, Dubas JS, Dorland M, Boersma H, te Velde E. Age at natural menopause in a population-based screening cohort: the role of menarche, fecundity, and lifestyle factors. Fertil Steril. 1997; 68(1):95–102. PMID: 9207591.
Article
48. Daniels K, Abma JC. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15–49: United States, 2015–2017. Updated 2018. https://nchstats.com/2018/12/19/current-contraceptive-status-among-women-aged-15-49-united-states-2015-2017/.
49. Pokoradi AJ, Iversen L, Hannaford PC. Factors associated with age of onset and type of menopause in a cohort of UK women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205(1):34.e1–34.13. PMID: 21514918.
Article
50. Ferreira JM, Monteiro I, Castro S, Villarroel M, Silveira C, Bahamondes L. The use of long acting reversible contraceptives and the relationship between discontinuation rates due to menopause and to female and male sterilizations. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016; 38(5):210–217. PMID: 27187927.
Article
51. Kavanaugh ML, Jerman J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception. 2018; 97(1):14–21. PMID: 29038071.
Article
52. Ha K, Kim K, Chun OK, Joung H, Song Y. Differential association of dietary carbohydrate intake with metabolic syndrome in the US and Korean adults: data from the 2007-2012 NHANES and KNHANES. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018; 72(6):848–860. PMID: 29339830.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr