Korean J Transplant.  2020 Dec;34(Supple 1):S58. 10.4285/ATW2020.OP-1257.

Clinical impact of complement deposition findings on biopsies in acute rejection episodes of pediatric renal transplant patients

• Gulleroglu K
• Baskin E
• Ozdemir H
• Yilmaz AC
• Soy EA
• Moray G
• Haberal M

• KMID: 2509204
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4285/ATW2020.OP-1257

Abstract

Background
Complement as a part of innate immunity, plays an important role in immune pathologies. Complement C3 activation is related with renal fibrosis. Locally synthetized C3 is more effective than circulating C3 on rejection. C4d staining is accepted as a histological finding of humoral rejection. We evaluate clinical impact of complement deposition findings on biopsies in acute rejection episodes of pediatric renal transplant patients.
Methods
Demographics of the patients, graft functions, infections, acute rejection episodes, and graft loss were recorded from data files of 165 pediatric renal transplant patients. Ninety-eight renal biopsies findings were retrospectively evaluated.
Results
Thirty-three (20 males and 13 females) patients with kidney transplant had different acute rejection episodes (32 cellular acute rejection episodes/12 humoral acute rejection episodes) which proven by biopsy. Mean age of patients with acute rejection episodes at the time of the transplantation was 12.82±3.87 years. Mean follow-up time after transplantation was 7.46±4.79 years. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) value at 3 years of follow-up was 64.13±20.86 mL/min and 5 years of follow-up was 41.40±27.18 mL/min. Complement deposition (C1q, C3 and C4 staining) was positive in 22 patients. Twenty-six patients had graft fibrosis. A significant relation between complement deposition and graft fibrosis could not be demonstrated. GFR values were similar at 3 and 5 years of follow-up between patients with and without complement deposition. All patients had a significant decrease in GFR value during follow-up. Patients who had not fibrotic changes in first biopsy had same deterioration of GFR when compared with patient who had fibrotic changes in first biopsy. Graft fibrosis rates were similar for cellular (78.12%) and humoral (75.00%) acute rejection episodes.
Conclusions
Our data demonstrated that graft outcomes and graft loss after acute rejection episodes cannot be predicted with complement deposition on graft during rejection episode or graft fibrosis. Each patient must be evaluated independently. Future studies can be helpful for determining dependent indicators of graft outcomes.